OBJECTIVES: Pharmacy-compounded sterile preparations (P-CSPs) are frequently relied upon in U.S. health care but are increasingly being linked to outbreaks of infections. We provide an updated overview of outbreak burden and characteristics, identify drivers of P-CSP demand, and discuss public health and patient safety lessons learned to help inform prevention. METHODS: Outbreaks of infections linked to contaminated P-CSPs that occurred between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2013, were identified from internal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports, Food and Drug Administration drug safety communications, and published literature. RESULTS: We identified 19 outbreaks linked to P-CSPs, resulting in at least 1000 cases, including deaths. Outbreaks were reported across two-thirds of states, with almost one-half (8/19) involving cases in more than 1 state. Almost one-half of outbreaks were linked to injectable steroids (5/19) and intraocular bevacizumab (3/19). Non-patient-specific compounding originating from nonsterile ingredients and repackaging of already sterile products were the most common practices associated with P-CSP contamination. Breaches in aseptic processing and deficiencies in sterilization procedures or in sterility/endotoxin testing were consistent findings. Hospital outsourcing, preference for variations of commercially available products, commercial drug shortages, and lower prices were drivers of P-CSP demand. CONCLUSIONS: Recognized outbreaks linked to P-CSPs have been most commonly associated with non-patient-specific repackaging and nonsterile to sterile compounding and linked to lack of adherence to sterile compounding standards. Recently enhanced regulatory oversight of compounding may improve adherence to such standards. Additional measures to limit and control these outbreaks include vigilance when outsourcing P-CSPs, scrutiny of drivers for P-CSP demand, as well as early recognition and notification of possible outbreaks.
OBJECTIVES: Pharmacy-compounded sterile preparations (P-CSPs) are frequently relied upon in U.S. health care but are increasingly being linked to outbreaks of infections. We provide an updated overview of outbreak burden and characteristics, identify drivers of P-CSP demand, and discuss public health and patient safety lessons learned to help inform prevention. METHODS: Outbreaks of infections linked to contaminated P-CSPs that occurred between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2013, were identified from internal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports, Food and Drug Administration drug safety communications, and published literature. RESULTS: We identified 19 outbreaks linked to P-CSPs, resulting in at least 1000 cases, including deaths. Outbreaks were reported across two-thirds of states, with almost one-half (8/19) involving cases in more than 1 state. Almost one-half of outbreaks were linked to injectable steroids (5/19) and intraocular bevacizumab (3/19). Non-patient-specific compounding originating from nonsterile ingredients and repackaging of already sterile products were the most common practices associated with P-CSP contamination. Breaches in aseptic processing and deficiencies in sterilization procedures or in sterility/endotoxin testing were consistent findings. Hospital outsourcing, preference for variations of commercially available products, commercial drug shortages, and lower prices were drivers of P-CSP demand. CONCLUSIONS: Recognized outbreaks linked to P-CSPs have been most commonly associated with non-patient-specific repackaging and nonsterile to sterile compounding and linked to lack of adherence to sterile compounding standards. Recently enhanced regulatory oversight of compounding may improve adherence to such standards. Additional measures to limit and control these outbreaks include vigilance when outsourcing P-CSPs, scrutiny of drivers for P-CSP demand, as well as early recognition and notification of possible outbreaks.
Authors: Serafin Gonzalez; Philip J Rosenfeld; Michael W Stewart; Jennifer Brown; Steven P Murphy Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Priti R Patel; A Kirsten Larson; Amanda D Castel; Lilia M Ganova-Raeva; Robert A Myers; Brenda J Roup; Katherine P Farrell; Leslie Edwards; Omana Nainan; John P Krick; David Blythe; Anthony E Fiore; Jeffrey C Roche Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-10-25 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Dejana Selenic; Douglas R Dodson; Bette Jensen; Matthew J Arduino; Adelisa Panlilio; Lennox K Archibald Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Date: 2003-07-15 Impact factor: 2.637
Authors: Rebecca H Sunenshine; Esther T Tan; Dawn M Terashita; Bette J Jensen; Marilyn A Kacica; Emily E Sickbert-Bennett; Judith A Noble-Wang; Michael J Palmieri; Dianna J Bopp; Daniel B Jernigan; Sophia Kazakova; Eddy A Bresnitz; Christina G Tan; L Clifford McDonald Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2007-07-24 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Lisa L Maragakis; Romanee Chaiwarith; Arjun Srinivasan; Francesca J Torriani; Edina Avdic; Andrew Lee; Tracy R Ross; Karen C Carroll; Trish M Perl Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Julia de Lima Farah; Ronaldo Sano; Ieda Maria Longo Maugéri; Daniela Teixeira; Mayari Eika Ishimura; Gabriela Martins; Lycia M J Mimica; Cely Barreto da Silva; Carsten H Meyer; João Rafael de Oliveira Dias; Gabriel Costa de Andrade; Michel Eid Farah Journal: Int J Retina Vitreous Date: 2018-10-24