Literature DB >> 26001512

Meiofaunal community analysis by high-throughput sequencing: comparison of extraction, quality filtering, and clustering methods.

Pamela M Brannock1, Kenneth M Halanych2.   

Abstract

Using molecular tools to examine community composition of meiofauna, animals 45μm to 1mm in size living between sediment grains in aquatic environments, is relatively new in comparison to bacterial and archaeal microbial studies. Although high-throughput molecular approaches are starting to be applied to these ccommunities, effectiveness of different approaches for nucleic acid extraction from meiofauna is poorly known and bioinformatic pipelines vary between studies. Given this situation, there is a need for protocols to be developed that promote consistency in sample collection and processing, sequence quality filtering, and Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) clustering methods. Herein, we assess different approaches used for DNA extraction (DNA extracted directly from sediment versus elutriated material retained on a 45μm sieve) as well as how different quality filtering methods of sequences and OTU clustering algorithms impact genetic assessment of meiofauna community composition. DNA extracted directly from sediment resulted in higher presence of non-metazoan eukaryotic taxa; in contrast, an elutriation (resuspension with decanting) approach increased meiofauna abundance and enriched metazoan OTUs. In regards to bioinformatics analyses, the number of overall OTUs varied by clustering algorithm, primarily due to the applied method of sequence quality filtering. However, alpha and beta diversity analyses showed similar trends regardless of bioinformatics pipeline utilized. Based on our results, we recommend studies of meiofauna communities first elutriate samples prior to DNA extraction and include multiple biological replicates to account for variation in community-level composition. The quality filtering method should be carefully considered as this step accounted for large discrepancy in the number of OTUs inferred.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Eukaryote; Illumina; Meiofauna; Metabarcoding; V9; clustering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26001512     DOI: 10.1016/j.margen.2015.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Genomics        ISSN: 1874-7787            Impact factor:   1.710


  18 in total

1.  Seasonal Variation in Fungal Community Composition Associated with Tamarix chinensis Roots in the Coastal Saline Soil of Bohai Bay, China.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Ali Bahadur; Wasim Sajjad; Xiukun Wu; Gaosen Zhang; Guangxiu Liu; Tuo Chen
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Quantification of marine benthic communities with metabarcoding.

Authors:  Lise Klunder; Judith D L van Bleijswijk; Loran Kleine Schaars; Henk W van der Veer; Pieternella C Luttikhuizen; Allert I Bijleveld
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 8.678

3.  Deep-Sea, Deep-Sequencing: Metabarcoding Extracellular DNA from Sediments of Marine Canyons.

Authors:  Magdalena Guardiola; María Jesús Uriz; Pierre Taberlet; Eric Coissac; Owen Simon Wangensteen; Xavier Turon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Spatio-temporal monitoring of deep-sea communities using metabarcoding of sediment DNA and RNA.

Authors:  Magdalena Guardiola; Owen S Wangensteen; Pierre Taberlet; Eric Coissac; María Jesús Uriz; Xavier Turon
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 5.  Censusing marine eukaryotic diversity in the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Matthieu Leray; Nancy Knowlton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  NGS-based biodiversity and community structure analysis of meiofaunal eukaryotes in shell sand from Hållö island, Smögen, and soft mud from Gullmarn Fjord, Sweden.

Authors:  Quiterie Haenel; Oleksandr Holovachov; Ulf Jondelius; Per Sundberg; Sarah J Bourlat
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2017-06-08

7.  DNA extraction replicates improve diversity and compositional dissimilarity in metabarcoding of eukaryotes in marine sediments.

Authors:  Anders Lanzén; Katrine Lekang; Inge Jonassen; Eric M Thompson; Christofer Troedsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Random sampling causes the low reproducibility of rare eukaryotic OTUs in Illumina COI metabarcoding.

Authors:  Matthieu Leray; Nancy Knowlton
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Grab what you can-an evaluation of spatial replication to decrease heterogeneity in sediment eDNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  Jon T Hestetun; Anders Lanzén; Thomas G Dahlgren
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  The challenge of proving the existence of metazoan life in permanently anoxic deep-sea sediments.

Authors:  Roberto Danovaro; Cristina Gambi; Antonio Dell'Anno; Cinzia Corinaldesi; Antonio Pusceddu; Ricardo Cardoso Neves; Reinhardt Møbjerg Kristensen
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 7.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.