Literature DB >> 26001246

"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you": breast imagers' perspectives regarding screening mammography for others and for themselves--do they practice what they preach?

Jiyon Lee1, Paula B Gordon, Gary J Whitman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine the screening recommendations that breast radiologists promote to average-risk patients and family or friends and do or would follow for themselves.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey of breast radiologists in the United States collected data regarding their personal and practice backgrounds, their recommendations to others for mammography and clinical and self-breast examination, and their personal screening habits based on respondent sex. The radiologists were divided into three cohorts: women 40 years old or older (group 1), women younger than 40 years (group 2), and men (group 3). The distribution of responses for each question was summarized, and proportions of total radiologists and cohorts were computed.
RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-seven surveys were collected. None of the radiologists recommended biennial mammography for patients ages 50-74 years, 98% (477/487) recommended yearly mammography for patients 40 years old and older, and 99% (470/476) recommended yearly mammography for family and friends 40 years old and older. The most common reasons for variance were institutional policy or provider preferences. In group 1, 96% (191/198) have yearly mammography. In group 2, 100% (83/83) have or will have yearly mammography at age 40 years and beyond. In group 3, 97% (171/176) would have yearly mammography at age 40 years and beyond if they were women. Overall, 97% (445/457) of radiologists have or would have yearly mammography at age 40 years and beyond.
CONCLUSION: Nearly all (98%) of the radiologists recommend yearly mammography for average-risk women 40 years old and older and were consistent in that they "practice what they preach." Because radiologists diagnose all stages of breast cancer, their personal convictions should influence providers, patients, and the public when considering the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force screening guidelines.

Entities:  

Keywords:  U.S. Preventive Services Task Force; breast cancer; mammography; screening guidelines; shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26001246     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.13237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  1 in total

1.  An evaluation of patient experience during percutaneous breast biopsy.

Authors:  Jean M Seely; Fraser Hill; Susan Peddle; Jackie Lau
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.