| Literature DB >> 26000301 |
Stephanie P Kurti1, Sara K Rosenkranz2, Morton Levitt3, Brooke J Cull2, Colby S Teeman2, Sam R Emerson2, Craig A Harms1.
Abstract
We investigated whether an acute bout of moderate intensity exercise in the postprandial period attenuates the triglyceride and airway inflammatory response to a high-fat meal (HFM) compared to remaining inactive in the postprandial period. Seventeen (11 M/6 F) physically active (≥ 150 min/week of moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA)) subjects were randomly assigned to an exercise (EX; 60% VO 2peak) or sedentary (CON) condition after a HFM (10 kcal/kg, 63% fat). Blood analytes and airway inflammation via exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) were measured at baseline, and 2 and 4 hours after HFM. Airway inflammation was assessed with induced sputum and cell differentials at baseline and 4 hours after HFM. Triglycerides doubled in the postprandial period (~113 ± 18%, P < 0.05), but the increase did not differ between EX and CON. Percentage of neutrophils was increased 4 hours after HFM (~17%), but the increase did not differ between EX and CON. Exhaled nitric oxide changed nonlinearly from baseline to 2 and 4 hours after HFM (P < 0.05, η (2) = 0.36). Our findings suggest that, in active individuals, an acute bout of moderate intensity exercise does not attenuate the triglyceride or airway inflammatory response to a high-fat meal.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26000301 PMCID: PMC4427006 DOI: 10.1155/2015/647952
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Experimental protocol for HFM testing day.
Subjects' characteristics.
| CON (7 M/2 F) | Range | EX (4 M/4 F) | Range | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value ± SD | Value ± SD | |||
| Age (years) | 22.4 ± 3.3 | 19–30 | 27.3 ± 7.3 | 19–38 |
| Height (cm) | 177.0 ± 9.6 | 165.4–193.5 | 170.4 ± 7.8 | 162.6–183.1 |
| Weight (kg) | 79.3 ± 16.4 | 62.3–111.3 | 70.7 ± 10.2 | 55.5–87.5 |
| Body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2) | 25.1 ± 2.9 | 20.9–29.7 | 24.4 ± 3.1 | 19.5–27.9 |
| Body fat (%) | 16.1 ± 6.8 | 5.4–24.3 | 23.5 ± 11.1 | 8.5–42.2 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 84.8 ± 5.1 | 77.5–91.3 | 85.5 ± 6.3 | 75.7–95.1 |
| Systolic (mmHg) | 120.6 ± 14.7 | 98–141 | 114.0 ± 6.4 | 108.5–126.5 |
| Diastolic (mmHg) | 65.1 ± 9.4 | 50–79 | 66.8 ± 7.5 | 60.5–82.0 |
| VO2 (L/min) | 4.3 ± 0.9 | 3.3–5.6 | 3.9 ± 1.0 | 2.9–5.6 |
| VO2peak (mL/kg/min) | 54.2 ± 4.7 | 47.2–63.1 | 54.9 ± 11.1 | 39.2–68.9 |
|
| ||||
| Baseline pulmonary function tests | CON (7 M/2 F) | Percent of predicted | EX (4 M/4 F) | Percent of predicted |
| Value ± SD | Value ± SD | |||
|
| ||||
| PEF (L/s) | 9.4 ± 3.02 | 109.1 ± 22.1 | 8.3 ± 2.3 | 104.3 ± 9.5 |
| FVC (L) | 6.0 ± 1.9 | 121.1 ± 21.8 | 4.7 ± 1.3 | 108 ± 11.6 |
| FEV1 (L) | 5.1 ± 1.5 | 5.1 ± 1.5 | 4.2 ± 1.2 | 111.4 ± 15.2 |
| FEV1/FVC | 86.7 ± 7.3 | 86.7 ± 7.3 | 87.8 ± 2.0 | 105.8 ± 3.7 |
| FEF25–75% (L/s) | 5.4 ± 1.5 | 112.1 ± 23.1 | 4.8 ± 1.2 | 108.3 ± 18.9 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD. There were no significant differences between CON and EX at baseline, P > 0.05.
PEF: peak expiratory flow; FVC: forced vital capacity; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FEV1/FVC (%): ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s to forced vital capacity; FEF25–75: forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75%.
Blood analyte values at baseline and 2 hours and 4 hours after HFM.
| Baseline | 2 hr | 4 hr | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | EX | CON | EX | CON | EX | |
| Value ± SD | Value ± SD | Value ± SD | Value ± SD | Value ± SD | Value ± SD | |
|
| 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 |
| TG (mg dL−1) | 67.0 ± 32.0 | 56.4 ± 18.5 | 118.4 ± 59.7* | 98.3 ± 35.3* | 154.2 ± 92.9* | 131.9 ± 79.7* |
| TC (mg dL−1) | 143.6 ± 16.3 | 145.0 ± 21.4 | 135.0 ± 13.3 | 154.5 ± 17.2‡ | 149.2 ± 25.7 | 147.5 ± 14.9 |
| HDL (mg dL−1) | 50.4 ± 12.9 | 56.8 ± 11.6 | 45.1 ± 8.4 | 59.1 ± 8.3‡ | 43.8 ± 8.5 | 54.9 ± 7.9 |
| LDL (mg dL−1) | 80.3 ± 12.6 | 75.3 ± 28.6 | 64.9 ± 19.2* | 74.7 ± 17.5‡ | 62.8 ± 19.9* | 66.1 ± 14.9‡ |
| Glucose (mg dL−1) | 84.4 ± 6.4 | 82.6 ± 13.7 | 76.2 ± 6.5 | 92.1 ± 10.6‡ | 86.1 ± 4.7 | 86.6 ± 7.7 |
| TC/HDL | 3.0 ± 0.7 | 2.6 ± 0.5 | 3.1 ± 0.7* | 2.7 ± 0.4 | 3.3 ± 0.7* | 2.7 ± 0.6 |
Blood analyte data at baseline and 2 hr and 4 hr after HFM in CON versus EX. Values are expressed as mean ± SD.
*Significantly different from baseline (P < 0.05).
‡Significantly different from CON (P < 0.05).
TG: triglycerides; TC: total cholesterol; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density
lipoprotein; glucose; TC/HDL: ratio of total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein.
Figure 2Triglyceride response after HFM. Black circles indicate CON and white circles indicate EX. There was a significant increase (∗) in triglycerides at two hours and four hours after HFM in both CON and EX. However, there was no significant difference between CON and EX (P > 0.05).
Metabolic data at baseline and 200 minutes after HFM.
| Baseline | 200 minutes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON ( | EX ( | CON ( | EX ( | |
| Value ± SD | Value ± SD | Value ± SD | Value ± SD | |
| Respiratory exchange ratio (RER) | 0.8 ± 0.04 | 0.8 ± 0.05 | 0.8 ± 0.04* | 0.8 ± 0.03 |
| Resting energy expenditure (REE) | 1909.5 ± 566.8 | 1741.9 ± 397.1 | 2177.7 ± 510.4* | 1873.0 ± 452.6 |
| Carbohydrates utilized (%) | 31.4 ± 12.7 | 32.1 ± 16.1 | 44.8 ± 17.8 | 27 ± 9.5 |
| Fat utilized (%) | 68.1 ± 12.6 | 67.3 ± 15.9 | 54.7 ± 14.7 | 72.1‡ ± 9.6 |
| Carbohydrate (kcal/day) | 639.8 ± 451.8 | 581.8 ± 361.3 | 1027.2 ± 536.2* | 517.3 ± 262.5* |
| Fat (kcal/day) | 1257.6 ± 308.2 | 1148.9 ± 319.3 | 1136.8 ± 238.6 | 1343.3‡ ± 343.9* |
Metabolic data at baseline and 200 minutes after the HFM. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. There is one missing piece of data at baseline in CON condition. Asterisks indicate being significantly different at 200 minutes from baseline (P < 0.05). ‡Significantly different from CON (P < 0.05).
Figure 3(a) displays the percent change in neutrophils present at 4 hours which was significantly correlated with minutes of walking in the exercise bout (r = 0.879, P = 0.050). (b) displays the percent of kilocalories of fat in the diet which is significantly correlated with the percentage increase of neutrophils in EX (r = 0.826, P = 0.043), but not in CON.
Airway inflammatory cell differentials at baseline and 4 hours after HFM.
| Baseline | 4 hr | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON ( | EX ( | CON ( | EX ( | |
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |
| Total cell counts (×106/L) | Range: 2.0–2.6 | Range: 2.0–2.4 | ||
| Percentage of macrophages | 28.9 ± 11.8 | 38.1 ± 15.1 | 26.9 ± 13.4 | 28.7 ± 9.3 |
| Percentage of neutrophils | 61.3 ± 15.8 | 53.3 ± 16.8 | 64.8 ± 10.4* | 64.5 ± 15.0* |
| Percentage of eosinophils | 0.3 ± 0.4 | 0.5 ± 0.5 | 0.5 ± 0.8* | 0.5 ± 0.7* |
| Percentage of basophils | 1.3 ± 1.4 | 0.9 ± 0.8 | 0.4 ± 0.5 | 0.8 ± 0.9 |
| Percentage of lymphocytes | 8.6 ± 4.7 | 7.7 ± 5.7 | 7.6 ± 3.7 | 7.6 ± 4.7 |
Airway inflammatory cell differentials in CON and EX at baseline and 4 hr after HFM. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Asterisks indicate that there was a significant increase in percentage of pulmonary neutrophils and eosinophils from baseline to 4 hours after HFM (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between CON and EX (P > 0.05).
Figure 4Percent change in triglycerides and airway inflammation four hours after HFM. Percentage change in triglycerides and percentage change in exhaled nitric oxide (ppb) is depicted in (a). There was no significant association between the percentage increase in triglycerides and the percentage increase in eNO (R 2 = 0.250, P > 0.05). Percentage change in triglycerides as well as percentage change in pulmonary neutrophils is depicted in (b). There was no significant association between the percentage increase in triglycerides and the percentage increase in pulmonary neutrophils (R 2 = 0.065, P > 0.05).