Literature DB >> 26000077

Retrospective study of facial nerve function following temporomandibular joint arthroplasty using the endaural approach.

Frederick Liu1, Helen Giannakopoulos1, Peter D Quinn1, Eric J Granquist1.   

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective case-control study is to evaluate the incidence of facial nerve injury associated with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthroplasty using the endaural approach for the treatment of TMJ pathology. The sample consisted of 36 consecutive patients who underwent TMJ arthroplasty. A total of 39 approaches were performed through an endaural incision. Patients undergoing total joint replacement and/or with preexisting facial nerve dysfunction were excluded from the study. Five patients were lost to follow-up and were excluded from the study. Facial nerve function of all patients was clinically evaluated by resident physicians preoperatively, postoperatively, and at follow-up appointments. Facial nerve injury was determined to have occurred if the patient was unable to raise the eyebrow or wrinkle the forehead (temporalis branch), completely close the eyelids (zygomatic branch), or frown (marginal mandibular branch). Twenty-one of the 36 patients or 22 of the 39 approaches showed signs of facial nerve dysfunction following TMJ arthroplasty. This included 12 of the 21 patients who had undergone previous TMJ surgery. The most common facial nerve branch injured was the temporal branch, which was dysfunctional in all patients either as the only branch injured or in combination with other branches. By the 18th postoperative month, normal function had returned in 19 of the 22 TMJ approaches. Three of the 22 TMJ approaches resulted in persistent signs of facial nerve weakness 6 months after the surgery. This epidemiological study revealed a low incidence of permanent facial nerve dysfunction. A high incidence of temporary facial nerve dysfunction was seen with TMJ arthroplasty using the endaural approach. Current literature reveals that the incidence of facial nerve injury associated with open TMJ surgery ranges from 12.5 to 32%. The temporal branch of the facial nerve was most commonly affected, followed by 4 of the 22 approaches with temporary zygomatic branch weakness. Having undergone previous TMJ surgery did not increase the incidence of facial nerve injury using the endaural approach. This information is important for patients and surgeons in the postoperative period, as a majority of patients will experience recovery of nerve function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroplasty; endaural approach; facial nerve injury; temporomandibular joint

Year:  2014        PMID: 26000077      PMCID: PMC4428711          DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1393726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  13 in total

1.  Prospective multicenter comparison of 4 temporomandibular joint operations.

Authors:  H David Hall; A Thomas Indresano; William S Kirk; Mary S Dietrich
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Significance and reliability of the House-Brackmann grading system for regional facial nerve function.

Authors:  Shari D Reitzen; James S Babb; Anil K Lalwani
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Modified endaural incision for surgical access to the temporomandibular joint.

Authors:  G J Nishioka; J E Van Sickels
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Facial nerve grading system.

Authors:  J W House; D E Brackmann
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 5.  Operative management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Katsnelson; Michael R Markiewicz; David A Keith; Thomas B Dodson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Morbidity associated with the preauricular and perimeatal approaches to the temporomandibular joint.

Authors:  M F Dolwick; D P Kretzschmar
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Surgery of the temporomandibular joint. I. Surgical anatomy and surgical incisions.

Authors:  K L Kreutziger
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1984-12

8.  Facial nerve function following temporomandibular joint surgery using the preauricular approach.

Authors:  S Weinberg; B Kryshtalskyj
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Discectomy as the primary surgical option for internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint.

Authors:  Michael Miloro; Brent Henriksen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Prospective study of facial nerve function after surgical procedures for the treatment of temporomandibular pathology.

Authors:  Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos; Ricardo Viana Bessa-Nogueira; Luiz Carlos Ferreira da Silva
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.895

View more
  1 in total

1.  Adhesive Hydrogels for Maxillofacial Tissue Regeneration Using Minimally Invasive Procedures.

Authors:  Christoph Salzlechner; Tabasom Haghighi; Isabella Huebscher; Anders Runge Walther; Sophie Schell; Alexander Gardner; Gerhard Undt; Ricardo M P da Silva; Cécile A Dreiss; Kathleen Fan; Eileen Gentleman
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 11.092

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.