Literature DB >> 25999903

Measuring the cognitive resources consumed per second for real-time lie-production and recollection: a dual-tasking paradigm.

Chao Hu1, Kun Huang2, Xiaoqing Hu3, Yanshuo Liu4, Fang Yuan4, Qiandong Wang4, Genyue Fu5.   

Abstract

This research report presents a novel method of dual-tasking lie-detection. Novel software "Follow Me" was invented for a concurrent eye-hand coordination task during truth-telling/lying. Undergraduate participants were instructed to tell truths on questions about undergraduate school whereas they were instructed to tell lies on interview questions about graduate school, pretending they were graduate students. Throughout the experiment, they operated the "Follow Me" software: moving the mouse pointer to follow a randomly-moving dot on a computer screen. The distance between the mouse pointer tip and the dot center was measured by the software every 50 ms. Frequency of distance fluctuation was analyzed as the index of cognitive effort consumed per second (i.e., "degree of cognitive effort"). The results revealed that the dominant frequency of distance fluctuation was significantly lower during encoding than during retrieving responses; and lower during lying than truth-telling. Thus, dominant frequency of distance fluctuation may be an effective index of cognitive effort. Moreover, both encoding and retrieving bald-faced lies were more cognitively effortful than truth-telling. This novel definition and measurement of degree of cognitive effort may contribute to the research field of deception as well as to many other fields in social cognition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive effort; dual-tasking; eye-hand coordination; lie-detection; lying

Year:  2015        PMID: 25999903      PMCID: PMC4423307          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  15 in total

1.  The deceptive response: effects of response conflict and strategic monitoring on the late positive component and episodic memory-related brain activity.

Authors:  Ray Johnson; Jack Barnhardt; John Zhu
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  Lying and executive control: an experimental investigation using ego depletion and goal neglect.

Authors:  Evelyne Debey; Bruno Verschuere; Geert Crombez
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2012-05-23

3.  Temporal course of executive control when lying about self- and other-referential information: an ERP study.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Hu; Haiyan Wu; Genyue Fu
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Accuracy of deception judgments.

Authors:  Charles F Bond; Bella M DePaulo
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2006

5.  Lying in everyday life.

Authors:  B M DePaulo; D A Kashy; S E Kirkendol; M M Wyer; J A Epstein
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1996-05

6.  The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.

Authors:  Ray Johnson; Heather Henkell; Elizabeth Simon; John Zhu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory.

Authors:  H Pashler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.

Authors:  Charles F Bond; Bella M Depaulo
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Advancing lie detection by inducing cognitive load on liars: a review of relevant theories and techniques guided by lessons from polygraph-based approaches.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Walczyk; Frank P Igou; Alexa P Dixon; Talar Tcholakian
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-01

10.  Learning to lie: effects of practice on the cognitive cost of lying.

Authors:  B Van Bockstaele; B Verschuere; T Moens; Kristina Suchotzki; Evelyne Debey; Adriaan Spruyt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-30
View more
  1 in total

1.  Detecting simulated versus bona fide traumatic brain injury using pupillometry.

Authors:  Sarah D Patrick; Lisa J Rapport; Robert J Kanser; Robin A Hanks; Jesse R Bashem
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.424

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.