Literature DB >> 25999533

AMPK-TBC1D4-dependent mechanism for increasing insulin sensitivity of skeletal muscle.

Gregory D Cartee1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25999533      PMCID: PMC4439559          DOI: 10.2337/db15-0010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes        ISSN: 0012-1797            Impact factor:   9.461


× No keyword cloud information.
Insulin resistance in skeletal muscle, the major site of insulin-stimulated blood glucose clearance, is a primary defect in the development of type 2 diabetes. Accordingly, there is great interest in interventions that improve muscle insulin sensitivity. A single exercise session can substantially enhance muscle insulin sensitivity for up to 24–48 h postexercise (1–11), but full discernment of the specific processes responsible for this health benefit remains elusive. Illuminating these mechanisms may be helpful for designing optimally effective exercise protocols. Furthermore, because of the very limited exercise capacity of many insulin-resistant people, these insights may enable the development of other therapies that improve insulin sensitivity by engaging the exercise-induced mechanisms. In vivo exercise influences many physiological systems, making it challenging to isolate the specific events that account for improved insulin sensitivity. A strategy to eliminate systemic exercise responses is to electrically stimulate the contraction of isolated rodent skeletal muscles. Using this approach, Gao et al. (5) discovered that ex vivo contractions could induce subsequently greater insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. Although ex vivo contraction is much less complicated than in vivo exercise, it still produces complex effects on calcium, tension, high-energy phosphates, glycogen and lipids, metabolic intermediates, redox potential, reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, and many enzymes. An even simpler strategy is to incubate an isolated muscle with a chemical that triggers a limited subset of exercise’s numerous consequences without causing muscle contraction. AMPK, which is stimulated by exercise/contraction, is also stimulated by AICAR. Fisher et al. (12) found that incubation of isolated rat muscles with AICAR produced a subsequent increase in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake, suggesting that AMPK activation can lead to increased insulin sensitivity in muscle. Although much is unknown about the mechanisms for improved insulin sensitivity after exercise, elevated phosphorylation of the Rab-GTPase protein known as TBC1D4 (also called Akt substrate of 160 kDa, AS160) has emerged as an attractive candidate to participate in the persistent increase in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. Enhanced TBC1D4 phosphorylation, which is crucial for insulin-stimulated GLUT4 translocation (13), tracks closely with the increased glucose uptake by insulin-stimulated muscle during the hours after acute exercise (7–11,14–16). If prior AICAR treatment is found to also produce greater TBC1D4 phosphorylation in insulin-stimulated muscles, it would suggest that AICAR and exercise may share a common mechanism to improve insulin sensitivity. In the current issue of Diabetes, Kjøbsted et al. (17) aim to determine if AMPK activation is essential for the AICAR-induced increase in muscle insulin sensitivity. Isolated extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and soleus muscles from mice were studied 4–6 h after 50 min of AICAR incubation. Prior AICAR exposure caused greater insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in the EDL, but not the soleus. To learn if AMPK activation was required for improved insulin sensitivity, additional experiments used EDL muscles from three different genetically modified mouse models in which muscle AMPK activity was greatly reduced. Prior AICAR exposure led to greater insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in muscles from wild-type mice with normal AMPK activity, but not in AMPK-deficient muscles. Furthermore, for insulin-stimulated muscles from wild-type mice, but not insulin-stimulated muscles from AMPK-deficient mice, prior AICAR stimulation led to greater TBC1D4 phosphorylation on Thr649 and Ser711. In tibialis anterior muscles expressing TBC1D4 that was mutated so that it could not be phosphorylated on Ser711, there was an attenuated insulin effect on TBC1D4 Thr649 phosphorylation. Given that AMPK can phosphorylate TBC1D4 on Ser711 (18) and that Thr649 phosphorylation is crucial for TBC1D4 regulation of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake (13,19), the authors speculate that the ability of AICAR to elevate TBC1D4 Ser711 phosphorylation may play a role in AICAR’s AMPK-dependent effect on insulin sensitivity (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

AMPK activity was increased in isolated muscles after brief (50 min) AICAR incubation, and AMPK was previously shown to phosphorylate TBC1D4 on Ser711. Six hours after AICAR treatment, insulin produced greater TBC1D4 Ser711 and Thr649 phosphorylation (pSer711-TBC1D4 and pThr649-TBC1D4, respectively) along with increased glucose uptake compared with insulin-stimulated muscles without AICAR pretreatment. Muscles expressing TBC1D4 that was mutated to prevent phosphorylation on Ser711 had attenuated insulin-stimulated pThr649-TBC1D4 (a site known to be crucial for insulin-stimulated glucose uptake). Prior effects of AICAR on TBC1D4 phosphorylation and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake were absent in genetically modified muscles that were AMPK deficient. The working hypothesis is that AICAR activation of AMPK leads to greater pSer711-TBC1D4, which facilitates elevated pThr649-TBC1D4 in subsequently insulin-stimulated muscles, leading to greater insulin-mediated glucose uptake.

AMPK activity was increased in isolated muscles after brief (50 min) AICAR incubation, and AMPK was previously shown to phosphorylate TBC1D4 on Ser711. Six hours after AICAR treatment, insulin produced greater TBC1D4 Ser711 and Thr649 phosphorylation (pSer711-TBC1D4 and pThr649-TBC1D4, respectively) along with increased glucose uptake compared with insulin-stimulated muscles without AICAR pretreatment. Muscles expressing TBC1D4 that was mutated to prevent phosphorylation on Ser711 had attenuated insulin-stimulated pThr649-TBC1D4 (a site known to be crucial for insulin-stimulated glucose uptake). Prior effects of AICAR on TBC1D4 phosphorylation and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake were absent in genetically modified muscles that were AMPK deficient. The working hypothesis is that AICAR activation of AMPK leads to greater pSer711-TBC1D4, which facilitates elevated pThr649-TBC1D4 in subsequently insulin-stimulated muscles, leading to greater insulin-mediated glucose uptake. The key and novel aspect of the experimental design of the current study was the use of muscles with normal AMPK activity and muscles that were AMPK deficient. In addition, the effect of AICAR on the activity of multiple AMPK isoforms was examined, and the greatest response was found for the α2β2γ3 heterotrimer. Furthermore, prior AICAR exposure led to greater insulin-stimulated glucose uptake concomitant with elevated TBC1D4 phosphorylation on Thr649 and Ser711. The results for TBC1D4 phosphorylation and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake were reminiscent of earlier observations after acute exercise (8–11,15). This study raises new questions that will require further research. First, AICAR treatment activated AMPK without enhancing subsequent insulin sensitivity in the soleus. This observation differs from the results of earlier research in which prior exercise led to enhanced insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in the soleus of either mice or rats (11,20). AICAR is a useful, but complementary, tool rather than a substitute for directly studying exercise. It would now be valuable to use AMPK-deficient models to test if normal AMPK activation is essential for the postexercise effect on insulin-stimulated glucose uptake by multiple muscles, including the soleus. Second, insulin-stimulated TBC1D4 Thr649 phosphorylation was attenuated in tibialis anterior muscles expressing TBC1D4 that was mutated to prevent Ser711 phosphorylation, but insulin-stimulated glucose uptake was not assessed, nor was the effect of AICAR pretreatment evaluated. Furthermore, the tibialis anterior was stimulated with insulin in vivo, in contrast to the isolated EDL that was used for other experiments. Future research should determine if mutation of TBC1D4 Ser711 eliminates the effects of AICAR or exercise on insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. Last, prior exercise leads to greater insulin-stimulated glucose uptake concomitant with elevated TBC1D4 phosphorylation in insulin-resistant muscle (10,15). Does prior AICAR treatment also elevate TBC1D4 phosphorylation and insulin sensitivity in insulin-resistant muscle? Kjøbsted et al. (17) provide compelling evidence that AMPK activation is essential for AICAR-induced elevation of muscle insulin sensitivity. The effects of prior AICAR exposure on TBC1D4 phosphorylation and glucose uptake in insulin-stimulated muscle were reminiscent of the effects of in vivo exercise on these outcomes. Together with earlier research demonstrating that acute exercise activates AMPK and leads to a subsequent increase in insulin sensitivity, the current observations provide the basis for the working hypothesis that the exercise-induced increase in insulin sensitivity is regulated by an AMPK-TBC1D4 signaling mechanism.
  20 in total

1.  Prior exercise increases phosphorylation of Akt substrate of 160 kDa (AS160) in rat skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Edward B Arias; Junghoon Kim; Katsuhiko Funai; Gregory D Cartee
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 4.310

2.  Increased submaximal insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in mouse skeletal muscle after treadmill exercise.

Authors:  Taku Hamada; Edward B Arias; Gregory D Cartee
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2006-06-29

3.  Activation of AMP kinase enhances sensitivity of muscle glucose transport to insulin.

Authors:  Jonathan S Fisher; Jiaping Gao; Dong-Ho Han; John O Holloszy; Lorraine A Nolte
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.310

4.  Prior AICAR stimulation increases insulin sensitivity in mouse skeletal muscle in an AMPK-dependent manner.

Authors:  Rasmus Kjøbsted; Jonas T Treebak; Joachim Fentz; Louise Lantier; Benoit Viollet; Jesper B Birk; Peter Schjerling; Marie Björnholm; Juleen R Zierath; Jørgen F P Wojtaszewski
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 9.461

5.  Increased AS160 phosphorylation, but not TBC1D1 phosphorylation, with increased postexercise insulin sensitivity in rat skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Katsuhiko Funai; George G Schweitzer; Naveen Sharma; Makoto Kanzaki; Gregory D Cartee
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 4.310

6.  Effect of physical exercise on sensitivity and responsiveness to insulin in humans.

Authors:  K J Mikines; B Sonne; P A Farrell; B Tronier; H Galbo
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1988-03

7.  Mice with AS160/TBC1D4-Thr649Ala knockin mutation are glucose intolerant with reduced insulin sensitivity and altered GLUT4 trafficking.

Authors:  Shuai Chen; David H Wasserman; Carol MacKintosh; Kei Sakamoto
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 27.287

8.  Postexercise improvement in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake occurs concomitant with greater AS160 phosphorylation in muscle from normal and insulin-resistant rats.

Authors:  Carlos M Castorena; Edward B Arias; Naveen Sharma; Gregory D Cartee
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 9.461

9.  Increased postexercise insulin sensitivity is accompanied by increased AS160 phosphorylation in slow-twitch soleus muscle.

Authors:  Maiko Iwabe; Emi Kawamoto; Keiichi Koshinaka; Kentaro Kawanaka
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2014-12-11

10.  Exercise alleviates lipid-induced insulin resistance in human skeletal muscle-signaling interaction at the level of TBC1 domain family member 4.

Authors:  Christian Pehmøller; Nina Brandt; Jesper B Birk; Louise D Høeg; Kim A Sjøberg; Laurie J Goodyear; Bente Kiens; Erik A Richter; Jørgen F P Wojtaszewski
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 9.461

View more
  7 in total

1.  Voluntary exercise opposes insulin resistance of skeletal muscle glucose transport during liquid fructose ingestion in rats.

Authors:  Yupaporn Rattanavichit; Jariya Buniam; Juthamard Surapongchai; Vitoon Saengsirisuwan
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.158

2.  Electrical pulse stimulation induces differential responses in insulin action in myotubes from severely obese individuals.

Authors:  Sanghee Park; Kristen D Turner; Donghai Zheng; Jeffrey J Brault; Kai Zou; Alec B Chaves; Thomas S Nielsen; Charles J Tanner; Jonas T Treebak; Joseph A Houmard
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-12-02       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  GLUT12 promotes prostate cancer cell growth and is regulated by androgens and CaMKK2 signaling.

Authors:  Mark A White; Efrosini Tsouko; Chenchu Lin; Kimal Rajapakshe; Jeffrey M Spencer; Sandi R Wilkenfeld; Sheiva S Vakili; Thomas L Pulliam; Dominik Awad; Fotis Nikolos; Rajasekhara Reddy Katreddy; Benny Abraham Kaipparettu; Arun Sreekumar; Xiaoliu Zhang; Edwin Cheung; Cristian Coarfa; Daniel E Frigo
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.678

Review 4.  Promoting Glucose Transporter-4 Vesicle Trafficking along Cytoskeletal Tracks: PAK-Ing Them Out.

Authors:  Ragadeepthi Tunduguru; Debbie C Thurmond
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 5.555

5.  Biochemical and Molecular Mechanisms of Glucose Uptake Stimulated by Physical Exercise in Insulin Resistance State: Role of Inflammation.

Authors:  Filipe Ferrari; Patrícia Martins Bock; Marcelo Trotte Motta; Lucas Helal
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Effect of a Low-Carbohydrate High-Fat Diet and a Single Bout of Exercise on Glucose Tolerance, Lipid Profile and Endothelial Function in Normal Weight Young Healthy Females.

Authors:  Thorhildur Ditta Valsdottir; Christine Henriksen; Nancy Odden; Birgitte Nellemann; Per B Jeppesen; Jonny Hisdal; Ane C Westerberg; Jørgen Jensen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 7.  The integration of autophagy and cellular trafficking pathways via RAB GAPs.

Authors:  Andreas Kern; Ivan Dikic; Christian Behl
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 16.016

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.