| Literature DB >> 25999301 |
Alper I Dai1, Sefika N Aksoy2, Abdullah T Demiryürek3.
Abstract
This retrospective study aimed to compare the therapeutic response, including side effects, for oral baclofen versus oral tizanidine therapy with adjuvant botulinum toxin type A in a group of 64 pediatric patients diagnosed with static encephalopathy and spastic equinus foot deformity. Following botulinum toxin A treatment, clinical improvement led to the gradual reduction of baclofen or tizanidine dosing to one-third of the former dose. Gross Motor Functional Measure and Caregiver Health Questionnaire scores were markedly elevated post-botulinum toxin A treatment, with scores for the tizanidine (Gross Motor Functional Measure: 74.45 ± 3.72; Caregiver Health Questionnaire: 72.43 ± 4.29) group significantly higher than for the baclofen group (Gross Motor Functional Measure: 68.23 ± 2.66; Caregiver Health Questionnaire: 67.53 ± 2.67, P < .001). These findings suggest that the combined use of botulinum toxin A and a low dose of tizanidine in treating children with cerebral palsy appears to be more effective and has fewer side effects versus baclofen with adjuvant botulinum toxin A.Entities:
Keywords: adverse effect; baclofen; botulinum toxin; cerebral palsy; tizanidine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25999301 DOI: 10.1177/0883073815587030
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Child Neurol ISSN: 0883-0738 Impact factor: 1.987