Literature DB >> 25998960

Evaluating emergency nurse practitioner service effectiveness on achieving timely analgesia: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Natasha Jennings1,2, Glenn Gardner1, Gerard O'Reilly2,3, Biswadev Mitra2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The rapid uptake of nurse practitioner (NP) services in Australia has outpaced evaluation of this service model. A randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the effectiveness of NP service versus standard medical care in the emergency department (ED) of a major referral hospital in Australia.
METHODS: Patients presenting with pain were randomly assigned to receive either standard ED medical care or NP care. Primary investigators were blinded to treatment allocation for data analyses. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients receiving analgesia within 30 minutes from being seen by care group. Secondary outcome measures were time to analgesia from presentation and documentation of and changes in pain scores.
RESULTS: There were 260 patients randomized; 128 received standard care (medical practitioner led), and 130 received NP care. Two patients needed to be excluded due to incomplete consent forms. The proportion of patients who received analgesia within 30 minutes from being seen was 49.2% (n = 64) in the NP group and 29.7% (n = 38) in the standard group, a difference of 19.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.9% to 31.2%; p = 0.001). Of 165 patients who received analgesia, 64 (84.2%) received analgesia within 30 minutes in the NP group compared to 38 (42.7%) in the standard care group, a difference in proportions of 41.5% (95% CI = 28.3% to 54.7%; p < 0.001). The mean (±SD) time from being seen to analgesia was 25.4 (±39.2) minutes for NP care and 43.0 (±35.5) minutes for standard care, a difference of 17.6 minutes (95% CI = 6.1 to 29.1 minutes; p = 0.003). There was a difference in the median change in pain score of 0.5 between care groups, but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.13).
CONCLUSIONS: Nurse practitioner service effectiveness was demonstrated through superior performance in achieving timely analgesia for ED patients.
© 2015 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25998960     DOI: 10.1111/acem.12687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  6 in total

Review 1.  Primary care professionals providing non-urgent care in hospital emergency departments.

Authors:  Daniela Gonçalves-Bradley; Jaspreet K Khangura; Gerd Flodgren; Rafael Perera; Brian H Rowe; Sasha Shepperd
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-13

Review 2.  The impact of the advanced practice nursing role on quality of care, clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and cost in the emergency and critical care settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brigitte Fong Yeong Woo; Jasmine Xin Yu Lee; Wilson Wai San Tam
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2017-09-11

3.  The effectiveness of emergency nurse practitioner service in the management of patients presenting to rural hospitals with chest pain: a multisite prospective longitudinal nested cohort study.

Authors:  Tina E Roche; Glenn Gardner; Leanne Jack
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Are service and patient indicators different in the presence or absence of nurse practitioners? The EDPRAC cohort study of Australian emergency departments.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Measuring without a ruler: Limited data to characterize the relationship between physician assistant/nurse practitioner staffing and emergency department performance.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Temin; Margaret E Samuels-Kalow; Rebecca E Cash; Krislyn M Boggs; Carlos A Camargo; Kori S Zachrison
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-01-15

6.  Exploring how nurses assess, monitor and manage acute pain for adult critically ill patients in the emergency department: protocol for a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Wayne Varndell; Margaret Fry; Doug Elliott
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.953

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.