Literature DB >> 25998582

Medical expulsive therapy in adults with ureteric colic: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Robert Pickard1, Kathryn Starr2, Graeme MacLennan2, Thomas Lam3, Ruth Thomas2, Jennifer Burr4, Gladys McPherson2, Alison McDonald2, Kenneth Anson5, James N'Dow3, Neil Burgess6, Terry Clark7, Mary Kilonzo8, Katie Gillies2, Kirsty Shearer2, Charles Boachie2, Sarah Cameron2, John Norrie2, Samuel McClinton9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Meta-analyses of previous randomised controlled trials concluded that the smooth muscle relaxant drugs tamsulosin and nifedipine assisted stone passage for people managed expectantly for ureteric colic, but emphasised the need for high-quality trials with wide inclusion criteria. We aimed to fulfil this need by testing effectiveness of these drugs in a standard clinical care setting.
METHODS: For this multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, we recruited adults (aged 18-65 years) undergoing expectant management for a single ureteric stone identified by CT at 24 UK hospitals. Participants were randomly assigned by a remote randomisation system to tamsulosin 400 μg, nifedipine 30 mg, or placebo taken daily for up to 4 weeks, using an algorithm with centre, stone size (≤5 mm or >5 mm), and stone location (upper, mid, or lower ureter) as minimisation covariates. Participants, clinicians, and trial personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who did not need further intervention for stone clearance within 4 weeks of randomisation, analysed in a modified intention-to-treat population defined as all eligible patients for whom we had primary outcome data. This trial is registered with the European Clinical Trials Database, EudraCT number 2010-019469-26, and as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number 69423238.
FINDINGS: Between Jan 11, 2011, and Dec 20, 2013, we randomly assigned 1167 participants, 1136 (97%) of whom were included in the primary analysis (17 were excluded because of ineligibility and 14 participants were lost to follow-up). 303 (80%) of 379 participants in the placebo group did not need further intervention by 4 weeks, compared with 307 (81%) of 378 in the tamsulosin group (adjusted risk difference 1·3% [95% CI -5·7 to 8·3]; p=0·73) and 304 (80%) of 379 in the nifedipine group (0·5% [-5·6 to 6·5]; p=0·88). No difference was noted between active treatment and placebo (p=0·78), or between tamsulosin and nifedipine (p=0·77). Serious adverse events were reported in three participants in the nifedipine group (one had right loin pain, diarrhoea, and vomiting; one had malaise, headache, and chest pain; and one had severe chest pain, difficulty breathing, and left arm pain) and in one participant in the placebo group (headache, dizziness, lightheadedness, and chronic abdominal pain).
INTERPRETATION: Tamsulosin 400 μg and nifedipine 30 mg are not effective at decreasing the need for further treatment to achieve stone clearance in 4 weeks for patients with expectantly managed ureteric colic. FUNDING: UK National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme.
Copyright © 2015 Pickard et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25998582     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60933-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  71 in total

Review 1.  Stones in 2015: Changes in stone management - suspending belief for evidence.

Authors:  Sapan N Ambani; Khurshid R Ghani
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  [Pain therapy for acute renal colics: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and non-opioids].

Authors:  S Schmidt; N Kroeger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Michael Ordon; Sero Andonian; Brian Blew; Trevor Schuler; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Evolving Guidance on Ureteric Calculi Management in the Acute Setting.

Authors:  Jonathan K Makanjuola; Sophie Rintoul-Hoad; Matthew Bultitude
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Derivation of decision rules to predict clinically important outcomes in acute flank pain patients.

Authors:  Ralph C Wang; Robert M Rodriguez; Jahan Fahimi; M Kennedy Hall; Stephen Shiboski; Tom Chi; Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-12-11       Impact factor: 2.469

6.  PURLs: Tamsulosin for patients with ureteral stones?

Authors:  Pamela Hughes; Corey Lyon
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Stones: Now the drugs don't work: tamsulosin is ineffective as medical expulsive therapy.

Authors:  Peter Sidaway
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 8.  Medical Expulsive Therapy: Worthwhile or Wishful Thinking.

Authors:  Tad Kroczak; Kenneth T Pace; Jason Y Lee
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Preclinical Testing of a Combination Stone Basket and Ureteral Balloon to Extract Ureteral Stones.

Authors:  Rustin Massoudi; Thomas J Metzner; Buzz Bonneau; Tin C Ngo; Rajesh Shinghal; John T Leppert
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  [The most important current guideline recommendations on the topic urolithiasis : A brief comparison].

Authors:  E Storz; F Kurtz; M Straub
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.