Literature DB >> 25998479

Callus Distraction Versus Single-Stage Lengthening With Bone Graft for Treatment of Brachymetatarsia: A Systematic Review.

Marc D Jones1, David M Pinegar2, Sarah A Rincker3.   

Abstract

Brachymetatarsia deformity is a cosmetically displeasing anomaly that can become physically symptomatic. The surgical techniques most commonly used to repair the anomaly include single-stage lengthening with a bone graft, callus distraction, or a combination of bone grafting and callus distraction. A systematic review of the published data was performed to compare the outcomes of these 3 surgical procedures. A total of 61 studies reporting the use of callus distraction or single-stage lengthening, or both, for the treatment of brachymetatarsia were included in the present review. The incidence of major postoperative complications after callus distraction, single-stage lengthening, and the combination procedure was 49 (12.62%), 13 (3.72%), and 3 (33.33%), respectively. The number of minor complications with callus distraction, single-stage lengthening, and the combination procedure was 152 (39.18%), 55 (15.76%), and 1 (11.11%); the mean percentage of the original length achieved was 37.36%, 25.98% and 36.00%; and the mean length achieved was 17.5, 13.2, and 14.0 mm, respectively. The healing index (mo/cm) and healing time was 2.31 and 16.04 weeks, 1.90 and 9.35 weeks, and 3.93 and 14.62 weeks for callus distraction, single-stage lengthening, and the combination procedure, respectively. Our findings indicate that the callus distraction technique is associated with greater length gained but results in greater complication rates and requires almost twice the time to heal. Single-stage lengthening with a bone graft was associated with fewer complications and faster healing times than callus distraction but with lesser gains in length. From the information reported in the studies we reviewed, the prevalence of bilateral brachymetatarsia was 44.52%, and the female/male ratio was 13.7:1. Both of these findings seem to contradict the usual data given (72% for bilateral brachymetatarsia and a female/male ratio of 25:1).
Copyright © 2015 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  congenital deformity; external fixation; metatarsal; surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25998479     DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg        ISSN: 1067-2516            Impact factor:   1.286


  5 in total

1.  Treatment of Complications after Distraction Osteogenesis for Brachymetatarsia of the Fourth Metatarsal.

Authors:  Mariko Hamada; Yoshiaki Sakamoto; Tomohisa Nagasao; Kazuo Kishi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-07-21

2.  Distraction Osteogenesis for Brachymetatarsia by Using Internal Device.

Authors:  Reina Kitabata; Yoshiaki Sakamoto; Tomohisa Nagasao; Kazuo Kishi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-07-25

3.  Distraction osteogenesis for brachymetatarsia using initial circular fixator and early trans-fixation metatarsal K-wires-a series of three cases.

Authors:  Pradeep Kumar; Anand Pillai; Jo-Ann Bate; Joshua Henry
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2018-10-11

4.  Brachymetatarsia: Surgical Management, Case Report, and Literature Review.

Authors:  David Zhu; Maxime Lefèvre; Andréa Fernandez; Laurent Galois
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2022-03-10

5.  Treatment of Brachymetatarsia Involving the Great Toe.

Authors:  Hui Taek Kim; Sung Min Hong; In Hee Kim
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2018-04-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.