Literature DB >> 25998207

Cross-cultural examination of the structure of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R).

Mari Botti1, Damien Khaw2, Emmy Brandt Jørgensen3, Bodil Rasmussen4, Susan Hunter4, Bernice Redley1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study investigated the cross-cultural factor stability and internal consistency of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R), a measure of the quality of postoperative pain management used internationally. We conducted exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of APS-POQ-R data from 2 point prevalence studies comprising 268 and 311 surveys of Danish and Australian medical-surgical patients, respectively. Parallel analysis indicated 4- and 3-factor solutions for Danish and Australian patients, respectively, which accounted for 58.1% and 52.9% of variance. Internal consistency was unsatisfactory among both Danish (Cronbach α = .54) and Australian (Cronbach α = .63) cohorts. There was a high degree of between-group similarity in item-factor loadings of variables coded as "pain experience," but not "pain management." This finding reflected cross-cultural differences in ratings of treatment satisfaction. For Danish patients, satisfaction was associated with the degree of pain severity and activity interference, whereas for Australian patients, satisfaction was associated with their perceived ability to participate in treatment. To facilitate further cross-cultural comparison, we compared our findings with past research conducted in the United States and Iceland. EFA supported the construct validity of the APS-POQ-R as a measure of "pain experience" but indicated that items measuring "pain management" may vary cross-culturally. Findings highlighted the need for further validation of the APS-POQ-R internationally. PERSPECTIVE: This study revealed the APS-POQ-R as a valid measure of postoperative pain experience for Danish and Australian patients. Measures of patients' perception of pain management were not robust to group differences in treatment expectations and demonstrated cross-cultural instability. Results highlighted the difficulties in establishing stable cross-cultural, cross-population subscales for the APS-POQ-R.
Copyright © 2015 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pain experience; construct validity; cross-cultural; patient participation; quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25998207     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  5 in total

1.  Pain after orthopaedic surgery: differences in patient reported outcomes in the United States vs internationally. An observational study from the PAIN OUT dataset.

Authors:  R Zaslansky; W Meissner; C R Chapman
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  ASSIST - Patient satisfaction survey in postoperative pain management from Indian subcontinent.

Authors:  Balavenkata Subramanian; Naman Shastri; Lutful Aziz; Ramachandran Gopinath; Anil Karlekar; Yatin Mehta; Anand Sharma; Jitendra Suhas Bapat; Pradeep Jain; Aveek Jayant; Tanvir Samra; Ajantha Perera; Anil Agarwal; Vijay Shetty; Sushma Bhatnagar; Sunil T Pandya; Paramanand Jain
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

3.  Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire concerning pain management in Chinese orthopedic patients.

Authors:  Huan Fang; Jingjuan Liang; Zhen Hong; Kenji Sugiyama; Takao Nozaki; Susumu Kobayashi; Tetsuro Sameshima; Hiroki Namba; Tetsuya Asakawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Postoperative Pain Management in Emergency Surgeries: A One-year Survey on Perception and Satisfaction among Surgical Patients.

Authors:  AbdulGhaffar A Yunus; Euphemia M Ugwu; Yunusa Ali; Ganiyat Olagunju
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2020-02-10

5.  Evaluate construct validity of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire in gynecological postoperative patients using confirmatory factor analysis.

Authors:  Sook Hui Chaw; Yoke Lin Lo; Jia Yin Lee; Jia Wing Wong; Wan Aizat Wan Zakaria; Shairil Rahayu Ruslan; Wei Keang Tan; Ina Ismiarti Shariffuddin
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.217

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.