Gary J Hodges1, Andrew T Del Pozzi2,3, Gregory W McGarr4, Matthew M Mallette4, Stephen S Cheung4. 1. Environmental Ergonomics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, L2S 3A1, Canada. ghodges@brocku.ca. 2. Department of Pediatrics, New York Medical College, Hawthorne, NY, 10532, USA. 3. Department of Physiology, New York Medical College, Hawthorne, NY, 10532, USA. 4. Environmental Ergonomics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, L2S 3A1, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The initial cutaneous vasodilatory response to local skin heating is larger in the forearm than the leg. While the initial vasodilatation of the forearm to local heating is primarily dependent on sensory nerves, their role in the leg is unknown. We compared the contribution of sensory nerves in driving the cutaneous vasodilatory response of the forearm and leg to local heating using local anaesthetic (EMLA) cream. METHOD: In seven participants, two skin sites were selected on both the dorsal forearm and anterolateral calf; one site on each region received EMLA, with the other an untreated control. All sites were controlled at 33 °C and then locally heated to 42 °C with integrated laser-Doppler local heating probes. RESULTS: Cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) during the initial vasodilatation to local heating was smaller in the leg (47 ± 9% max) compared to the forearm (62 ± 7 % max) (P = 0.012). EMLA reduced the initial vasodilatation at both the leg (27 ± 13 % max) (P = 0.02) and forearm (33 ± 14% max) (P < 0.001). The times to onset of vasodilatation, initial vasodilatory peak, and plateau phase were longer in the leg compared to the forearm (all P < 0.05), and EMLA increased these times in both regions (both P < 0.05). CVC during the plateau phase to sustained local skin heating was higher in the leg compared to the forearm at both the untreated (93 ± 6 vs. 85 ± 4% max) (P = 0.33) and EMLA-treated (94 ± 5 vs. 86 ± 6% max) (P = 0.001) sites; EMLA did not affect CVC (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The differences in the initial vasodilatory peak to local skin heating between the forearm and the leg are due to the contribution of sensory nerves.
PURPOSE: The initial cutaneous vasodilatory response to local skin heating is larger in the forearm than the leg. While the initial vasodilatation of the forearm to local heating is primarily dependent on sensory nerves, their role in the leg is unknown. We compared the contribution of sensory nerves in driving the cutaneous vasodilatory response of the forearm and leg to local heating using local anaesthetic (EMLA) cream. METHOD: In seven participants, two skin sites were selected on both the dorsal forearm and anterolateral calf; one site on each region received EMLA, with the other an untreated control. All sites were controlled at 33 °C and then locally heated to 42 °C with integrated laser-Doppler local heating probes. RESULTS: Cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) during the initial vasodilatation to local heating was smaller in the leg (47 ± 9% max) compared to the forearm (62 ± 7 % max) (P = 0.012). EMLA reduced the initial vasodilatation at both the leg (27 ± 13 % max) (P = 0.02) and forearm (33 ± 14% max) (P < 0.001). The times to onset of vasodilatation, initial vasodilatory peak, and plateau phase were longer in the leg compared to the forearm (all P < 0.05), and EMLA increased these times in both regions (both P < 0.05). CVC during the plateau phase to sustained local skin heating was higher in the leg compared to the forearm at both the untreated (93 ± 6 vs. 85 ± 4% max) (P = 0.33) and EMLA-treated (94 ± 5 vs. 86 ± 6% max) (P = 0.001) sites; EMLA did not affect CVC (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The differences in the initial vasodilatory peak to local skin heating between the forearm and the leg are due to the contribution of sensory nerves.
Entities:
Keywords:
EMLA; Laser Doppler; Local heating; Skin blood flow
Authors: Nicholas A Strom; Jessica R Sawyer; Shelly K Roberts; Shirley M Kingsley-Berg; Nisha Charkoudian Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2009-12-03
Authors: Haoxing Xu; I Scott Ramsey; Suhas A Kotecha; Magdalene M Moran; Jayhong A Chong; Deborah Lawson; Pei Ge; Jeremiah Lilly; Inmaculada Silos-Santiago; Yu Xie; Peter S DiStefano; Rory Curtis; David E Clapham Journal: Nature Date: 2002-06-23 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Anna E Stanhewicz; Jody L Greaney; W Larry Kenney; Lacy M Alexander Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2014-08-06 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Brett J Wong; Casey G Turner; James T Miller; Demetria C Walker; Yesser Sebeh; Matthew J Hayat; Jeffrey S Otis; Arshed A Quyyumi Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2020-06-19 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: James T Miller; Casey G Turner; Jeffrey S Otis; Yesser Sebeh; Matthew J Hayat; Arshed A Quyyumi; Brett J Wong Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2020-10-30 Impact factor: 4.733