BACKGROUND: In terms of motivation and long-term adherence, low-resistance exercise might be more suitable for older adults than high-resistance exercise. However, more data are needed to support this claim. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to investigate the effect of low- and high-resistance exercise protocols on long-term adherence and motivation. METHODS: This study was designed as an exploratory 24-week follow-up of a randomized 12-week resistance training intervention in older adults. Participants were free to decide whether or not they continued resistance training at their own expense following the intervention. Fifty-six older adults were randomly assigned to HIGH [2 × 10-15 repetitions at 80% of one repetition maximum (1RM)], LOW (1 × 80-100 repetitions at 20% of 1RM), or LOW+ (1 × 60 repetitions at 20% of 1RM + 1 × 10-20 repetitions at 40% 1RM). Motivation, self-efficacy and the perceived barriers for continuing resistance exercise were measured after cessation of each supervised intervention and at follow-up, while long-term adherence was probed retrospectively at follow-up. RESULTS: Participants reported high levels of self-determined motivation before, during, and after the supervised intervention, with no differences between groups (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, only few participants continued strength training after the intervention: 17% in HIGH, 21% in LOW+, and 11% in LOW (p > 0.05). The most commonly reported barriers for continuing resistance exercise were perceived lack of time (46%), being more interested in other physical activities (40%), seasonal reasons (40%), and financial cost (28%). CONCLUSION: The results suggest no difference in long-term adherence after the end of a supervised exercise intervention at high or low external resistances. Long-term adherence was limited despite high levels of self-determined motivation during the interventions. These findings highlight the importance of further research on developing strategies to overcome barriers of older adults to adhere to resistance exercise without supervision.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: In terms of motivation and long-term adherence, low-resistance exercise might be more suitable for older adults than high-resistance exercise. However, more data are needed to support this claim. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to investigate the effect of low- and high-resistance exercise protocols on long-term adherence and motivation. METHODS: This study was designed as an exploratory 24-week follow-up of a randomized 12-week resistance training intervention in older adults. Participants were free to decide whether or not they continued resistance training at their own expense following the intervention. Fifty-six older adults were randomly assigned to HIGH [2 × 10-15 repetitions at 80% of one repetition maximum (1RM)], LOW (1 × 80-100 repetitions at 20% of 1RM), or LOW+ (1 × 60 repetitions at 20% of 1RM + 1 × 10-20 repetitions at 40% 1RM). Motivation, self-efficacy and the perceived barriers for continuing resistance exercise were measured after cessation of each supervised intervention and at follow-up, while long-term adherence was probed retrospectively at follow-up. RESULTS:Participants reported high levels of self-determined motivation before, during, and after the supervised intervention, with no differences between groups (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, only few participants continued strength training after the intervention: 17% in HIGH, 21% in LOW+, and 11% in LOW (p > 0.05). The most commonly reported barriers for continuing resistance exercise were perceived lack of time (46%), being more interested in other physical activities (40%), seasonal reasons (40%), and financial cost (28%). CONCLUSION: The results suggest no difference in long-term adherence after the end of a supervised exercise intervention at high or low external resistances. Long-term adherence was limited despite high levels of self-determined motivation during the interventions. These findings highlight the importance of further research on developing strategies to overcome barriers of older adults to adhere to resistance exercise without supervision.
Authors: Nicolette A Moya; Margaret K Tanner; Abigail M Smith; Aleezah Balolia; Jazmyne K P Davis; Kelsey Bonar; Jennifer Jaime; Troy Hubert; Jorge Silva; William Whitworth; Esteban C Loetz; Sondra T Bland; Benjamin N Greenwood Journal: Neurobiol Learn Mem Date: 2020-10-17 Impact factor: 2.877
Authors: Courtney A Bouchet; Brian A Lloyd; Esteban C Loetz; Caroline E Farmer; Mykola Ostrovskyy; Natalie Haddad; Rebecca M Foright; Benjamin N Greenwood Journal: Learn Mem Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 2.460
Authors: Anna Pieczyńska; Ewa Zasadzka; Tomasz Trzmiel; Małgorzata Pyda; Mariola Pawlaczyk Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: James Steele; Kristin Raubold; Wolfgang Kemmler; James Fisher; Paulo Gentil; Jürgen Giessing Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Eneko Baz-Valle; Brad J Schoenfeld; Jon Torres-Unda; Jordan Santos-Concejero; Carlos Balsalobre-Fernández Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-12-27 Impact factor: 3.240