Literature DB >> 25996751

Impact of electrode configurations on retention time and domestic wastewater treatment efficiency using microbial fuel cells.

Kyoung-Yeol Kim1, Wulin Yang1, Bruce E Logan2.   

Abstract

Efficient treatment of domestic wastewater under continuous flow conditions using microbial fuel cells (MFCs) requires hydraulic retention times (HRTs) that are similar to or less than those of conventional methods such as activated sludge. Two MFCs in series were compared at theoretical HRTs of 8.8, 4.4 and 2.2 h using two different brush-electrode MFC configurations: a full brush evenly spaced between two cathodes (S2C); and trimmed brush anodes near a single cathode (N1C). The MFCs with two cathodes produced more power than the MFCs with a single cathode, with 1.72 mW for the S2C, compared to and 1.12 mW for the N1C at a set HRT = 4.4 h. The single cathode MFCs with less cathode area removed slightly more COD (54.2 ± 2.3%, N1C) than the two-cathode MFCs (48.3 ± 1.0%, S2C). However, the higher COD removal was due to the longer HRTs measured for the MFCs with the N1C configuration (10.7, 5.3 and 3.1 h) than with the S2C configuration (7.2, 3.7 and 2.2 h), despite the same theoretical HRT. The longer HRTs of the N1C MFCs also resulted in slightly higher coulombic efficiencies (≤37%) than those of the S2C MFCs (≤29%). While the S2C MFC configuration would be more advantageous based on electrical power production, the N1C MFC might be more useful on the basis of capital costs relative to COD removal efficiency due to the use of less cathode surface area per volume of reactor.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brush anode electrode; Continuous flow mode; Flow pattern; Hydraulic retention time; Microbial fuel cell

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25996751     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  4 in total

1.  Deriving electricity from dye processing wastewater using single chamber microbial fuel cell with carbon brush anode and platinum nano coated air cathode.

Authors:  Tamilarasan Karuppiah; Arulazhagan Pugazhendi; Sakthivel Subramanian; Mamdoh T Jamal; Rajesh Banu Jeyakumar
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 2.  Applications of Graphene-Modified Electrodes in Microbial Fuel Cells.

Authors:  Fei Yu; Chengxian Wang; Jie Ma
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Supercapacitive microbial fuel cell: Characterization and analysis for improved charge storage/delivery performance.

Authors:  Jeremiah Houghton; Carlo Santoro; Francesca Soavi; Alexey Serov; Ioannis Ieropoulos; Catia Arbizzani; Plamen Atanassov
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 9.642

4.  Effects of azo dye on simultaneous biological removal of azo dye and nutrients in wastewater.

Authors:  Aihui Chen; Bairen Yang; Yuanqiang Zhou; Yuze Sun; Cheng Ding
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.963

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.