| Literature DB >> 25996619 |
Andreea Waltmann1, Andrew W Darcy2, Ivor Harris3, Cristian Koepfli1, John Lodo4, Ventis Vahi2, David Piziki2, G Dennis Shanks3, Alyssa E Barry1, Maxine Whittaker5, James W Kazura6, Ivo Mueller7.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Solomon Islands is intensifying national efforts to achieve malaria elimination. A long history of indoor spraying with residual insecticides, combined recently with distribution of long lasting insecticidal nets and artemether-lumefantrine therapy, has been implemented in Solomon Islands. The impact of these interventions on local endemicity of Plasmodium spp. is unknown.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25996619 PMCID: PMC4440702 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003758
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Fig 1Ngella sampling sites and spatial distribution of P. vivax prevalence (qPCR).
The 9 island provinces of SI are shown in the top right inset. A (inset). Central Islands Province. B (inset). Ngella. B. Ngella study catchments and prevalence. Anchor Island (catchments shown in yellow), Bay (catchments in red), Channel (catchments in purple), North Coast (catchments in orange) and South Coast (catchments in blue). The size of the prevalence pie chart reflects village sample size.
Fig 2Age trends of P. vivax infections.
A: P. vivax blood stage parasite prevalence by LM and qPCR (error bars represent binomial 95% confidence intervals, CI95). B: P. vivax parasite densities by qPCR (18S DNA copies/l) and LM counts (parasites/l) (error bars represent 95% confidence intervals, CI95). C: Gametocyte prevalence (in the total sampled population) and positivity (only among P. vivax infected) (error bars represent 95% confidence intervals, CI95). D: P. vivax multiplicity of infection (MOI) of blood stage parasites (error bars represent 95% confidence intervals, CI95).
Multivariable associations with P. vivax infection.
|
| PR | AOR | CI95 |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Bay | 1,161 | 13.7 |
| ||
| Channel | 463 | 13.2 | 1.01 | [0.71, 1.44] | <0.001 | |
| Anchor | 857 | 3.9 | 0.28 | [0.18, 0.44] | ||
| North Coast | 523 | 31.7 | 2.52 | [1.90, 3.34] | ||
| South Coast | 497 | 9.9 | 0.74 | [0.52, 1.06] | ||
|
| <2 | 166 | 3 |
| ||
| 2–4 | 370 | 5.4 | 1.90 | [0.68, 5.30] | <0.001 | |
| 5–9 | 517 | 15.1 | 5.46 | [2.13, 14.01] | ||
| 10–14 | 499 | 24.3 | 8.41 | [3.31, 21.38] | ||
| 15–19 | 263 | 14.5 | 5.03 | [1.88, 13.40] | ||
| 20–39 | 940 | 12.6 | 4.75 | [1.88, 12.02] | ||
| ≥40 | 746 | 11.8 | 4.40 | [1.72, 11.23] | ||
|
| No | 661 | 18.5 |
| ||
| Yes | 2,465 | 12 | 0.76 | [0.50, 0.98] | 0.030 | |
|
| No | 685 | 14.3 |
| ||
| Yes | 2,793 | 9.9 | 0.65 | [0.48, 0.89] | 0.001 | |
|
| No | 169 | 8.3 |
| ||
| Yes | 3,317 | 13.7 | 1.91 | [1.05, 3.48] | 0.004 | |
|
| No | 2,235 | 63.8 |
| ||
| Yes | 1,266 | 36.2 | 1.75 | [1.39, 2.20] | <0.001 | |
n = sample size, PR = prevalence of P. vivax infection, AOR = adjusted odds ratio (predicted difference in odds of P. vivax infection compared to the baseline odds of P. vivax infection of the reference group), CI95 = 95% confidence intervals.
aOverall p-values for variables with multiple levels (age group and region) were derived by use of the likelihood ratio test comparing expanded (includes variable of interest) and nested (does not include variable of interest) models. P-values for the remaining variables are derived from the Wald test.
Multivariable associations with P. vivax density estimates by qPCR.
| n | Geometric mean of parasite density (DNA copies/μl) | Regression Coefficient | CI95 |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Bay | 1161 | 2.98 |
| ||
| Channel | 463 | 4.73 | 0.12 | [-0.09, 032] | <0.001 | |
| Anchor | 857 | 4.20 | 0.12 | [-0.14, 0.39] | ||
| North Coast | 523 | 6.21 | 0.25 | [0.09, 0.40] | ||
| South Coast | 497 | 7.64 | 0.45 | [0.22, 0.67] | ||
|
| <2 | 166 | 20.88 |
| ||
| 2–4 | 370 | 8.99 | -0.19 | [-0.89, 0.50] | <0.001 | |
| 5–9 | 517 | 11.28 | -0.1 | [-0.75, 0.54] | ||
| 10–14 | 499 | 4.97 | -0.41 | [-1.05, 0.24] | ||
| 15–19 | 263 | 3.67 | -0.52 | [-1.19, 0.15] | ||
| 20–39 | 940 | 2.99 | -0.62 | [-1.26, 0.02] | ||
| ≥40 | 746 | 3.03 | -0.67 | [-1.31, -0.02] | ||
|
| No | 2798 | 4.39 |
| ||
| Yes | 675 | 6.29 | 0.2 | [0.01, 0.39] | 0.036 | |
|
| No | 2682 | 4.01 |
| ||
| Yes | 815 | 8.46 | 0.2 | [0.03, 0.37] | 0.023 | |
§The regression coefficients represent the predicted changes in 10-fold parasite density (estimated as 18S DNA copies/μL) compared to the mean parasite density of the reference group.
aOverall p-values for variables with multiple levels (age group and region) were derived by use of the likelihood ratio test comparing expanded (i.e. including the variable of interest) and nested (not including the variable of interest) models. P-values for the remaining variables are derived from the Wald test.
Fig 3Diversity of P. vivax genotypic markers msp1F3 and MS16.
Allelic frequencies of P. vivax msp1F3, MS16 and the combined msp1F3 / MS16 haplotypes. For msp1F3 and MS16, the frequency of the four most common alleles and respective sizes (in basepairs) are shown. The number of unique alleles identified and the estimated expected heterozygosity (HE) are given below the figure.