Two heterobimetallic complexes, i.e. [RuCl2(p-cymene)(μ-dppm)AuC] (1) and [RuCl2(p-cymene)(μ-dppm)Au(S-thiazoline)] (3), based on known cytotoxic [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2(PR3)] and [AuX(PR3)] (X = Cl, SR) molecular scaffolds, with the diphosphane linker 1,1-bis(diphenylphosphino)methane, dppm, were conveniently prepared and characterised. Remarkably, the new compounds manifested a more favourable in vitro pharmacological profile toward cancer cells than individual ruthenium and gold species being either more cytotoxic or more selective. The interactions of the studied compounds with (pBR322) DNA and their inhibitory effects on cathepsin B were also assessed. In addition, their reactivity toward suitable models of protein targets was explored and clear evidence gained for disruption of the bimetallic motif and for protein binding of monometallic fragments. Overall, the data reported here strongly support the concept of multifunctional heterometallic compounds as "improved" candidate agents for cancer treatment. The mechanistic and pharmacological implications of the present findings are discussed.
Two heterobimetallic complexes, i.e. [n class="Chemical">RuCl2(p-cymene)(μ-dppm)AuC] (1) and [RuCl2(p-cymene)(μ-dppm)Au(S-thiazoline)] (3), based on known cytotoxic[Ru(p-cymene)Cl2(PR3)] and [AuX(PR3)] (X = Cl, SR) molecular scaffolds, with the diphosphane linker 1,1-bis(diphenylphosphino)methane, dppm, were conveniently prepared and characterised. Remarkably, the new compounds manifested a more favourable in vitro pharmacological profile toward cancer cells than individual ruthenium and gold species being either more cytotoxic or more selective. The interactions of the studied compounds with (pBR322) DNA and their inhibitory effects on cathepsin B were also assessed. In addition, their reactivity toward suitable models of protein targets was explored and clear evidence gained for disruption of the bimetallic motif and for protein binding of monometallic fragments. Overall, the data reported here strongly support the concept of multifunctional heterometallic compounds as "improved" candidate agents for cancer treatment. The mechanistic and pharmacological implications of the present findings are discussed.
Authors: Jose F González-Pantoja; Michael Stern; Andrzej A Jarzecki; Eva Royo; Elisa Robles-Escajeda; Armando Varela-Ramírez; Renato J Aguilera; María Contel Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 5.165
Authors: Jeany M Rademaker-Lakhai; Desiree van den Bongard; Dick Pluim; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Angela Casini; Chiara Gabbiani; Francesca Sorrentino; Maria Pia Rigobello; Alberto Bindoli; Tilmann J Geldbach; Alessandro Marrone; Nazzareno Re; Christian G Hartinger; Paul J Dyson; Luigi Messori Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2008-10-04 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Jacob Fernández-Gallardo; Benelita T Elie; Florian J Sulzmaier; Mercedes Sanaú; Joe W Ramos; María Contel Journal: Organometallics Date: 2014-10-30 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Malgorzata Frik; Alberto Martínez; Benelita T Elie; Oscar Gonzalo; Daniel Ramírez de Mingo; Mercedes Sanaú; Roberto Sánchez-Delgado; Tanmoy Sadhukha; Swayam Prabha; Joe W Ramos; Isabel Marzo; María Contel Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Natalia Curado; Nora Giménez; Kirill Miachin; Mélanie Aliaga-Lavrijsen; Mike A Cornejo; Andrzej A Jarzecki; María Contel Journal: ChemMedChem Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Benelita T Elie; Karen Hubbard; Buddhadev Layek; Won Seok Yang; Swayam Prabha; Joe W Ramos; Maria Contel Journal: ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci Date: 2020-04-09
Authors: Benelita T Elie; Jacob Fernández-Gallardo; Natalia Curado; Mike A Cornejo; Joe W Ramos; María Contel Journal: Eur J Med Chem Date: 2018-10-17 Impact factor: 6.514