| Literature DB >> 25996370 |
.
Abstract
Year: 2015 PMID: 25996370 PMCID: PMC4440616 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128717
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 3Mean facial muscle activity of receivers over time as a function of odor.
(A) Mean corrugator supercilii activity (i.e., brow knit) following odor onset (in seconds). (B) Mean medial frontalis activity (i.e., brow lift) following odor onset (in seconds). Facial muscle activity displayed here was measured before the start of the facial expression classification task, to isolate the effect of odor. Error bars reflect 68% within-subjects CI of the interaction between odor and time.
Fig 4Mean facial muscle co-activation of receivers over time as a function of odor.
Facial muscle activity displayed here was measured before the start of the facial expression classification task, to isolate the effect of odor. Above each bar, the time after odor onset (in seconds) is depicted (see Y-axis). The more each bar is located toward the upper-right end point (vs. bottom-left starting point) of the dashed diagonal, the more the medial frontalis and corrugator supercilii muscles co-activated (μV), resembling a fearful facial expression [cf. 11, 12].
Fig 5Mean facial muscle activity of receivers per odor condition during classification of presented (emotional) facial expressions.
Odor condition: Baseline, fast stress, slow stress. Facial expressions that had to be classified: Neutral, happy, fear, disgust. For clarification purposes, the display of mean facial muscle activity on the emotional facial expression classification task was collapsed over the variable noise level (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, 100%). (A) Mean corrugator supercilii activity, averaged over 1 second following the onset of the presented expression. (B) Mean medial frontalis activity, averaged over 1 second following the onset of the presented expression. Error bars reflect 68% within-subjects CI of the main effect of odor.