| Literature DB >> 25995828 |
Hyun Jung Roh1, Hye-Ji Noh2, Chun Su Na2, Chung Sub Kim3, Ki Hyun Kim3, Cheol Yi Hong2, Kang Ro Lee3.
Abstract
The half-dried leaves of Stewartia. pseudocamellia were extracted with hot water (SPE) and partitioned with n-hexane (SPEH), dichloromethane (SPED), and ethyl acetate (SPEE) successively. SPE and SPEE showed significant inhibitory effects against melanogenesis and tyrosinase activities. By bioassay-guided isolation, ten phenolic compounds were isolated by column chromatography from SPEE. The whitening effect of the isolated compounds from SPEE were tested for the inhibitory activities against melanogenesis using B16 melanoma cells, in vitro inhibition of tyrosinase, and L-3,4-dihydorxy-indole-2-carboxylic acid (L-DOPA) auto-oxidation assay. A cytotoxic activity assay was done to examine the cellular toxicity in Raw 264.7 macrophage cells. Of the compounds isolated, gallic acid and quercetin revealed significant inhibitory activities against melanogenesis compared to arbutin. In particular, quercetin exhibited similar inhibitory activities against tyrosinase and L-DOPA oxidation without cytotoxicity. These results suggested that SPE could be used as a potential source of natural skin-whitening material in cosmetics as well as in food products.Entities:
Keywords: Melanogenesis; Quercetin; Skin whitening; Stewartia pseudocamellia Maxim.; Tyrosinase
Year: 2015 PMID: 25995828 PMCID: PMC4428722 DOI: 10.4062/biomolther.2014.140
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomol Ther (Seoul) ISSN: 1976-9148 Impact factor: 4.634
Fig. 1.Extraction and solvent partition of S. pseudocamellia Maxim. leaves.
Fig. 2.Structures of compounds 1–10 isolated from ethyl acetate fraction of S. pseudocamellia leaves.
Inhibitory effects of SPE and its fractions on melanogenesis in B16F1 melanoma cells
| Sample conc. | Inhibition (%)[ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| 10 μg/mL | 50 μg/mL | 100 μg/mL | |
| IBMX control | 0.0 ± 1.4 | ||
| SPE | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 5.3 ± 0.1 | 26.2 ± 1.2 |
| SPEH | 1.2 ± 0.6 | 10.3 ± 4.5 | 57.3 ± 1.3 |
| SPED | 1.4 ± 3.4 | −0.9 ± 3.1 | 20.8 ± 3.5 |
| SPEE | 13.2 ± 4.1 | 29.3 ± 1.6 | 57.1 ± 3.7 |
| Arbutin | 11.8 ± 3.6 | 28.2 ± 0.9 | 31.3 ± 0.3 |
Each value was expressed as the mean ± SD from the three independent experiments,
p<0.01,
p<0.001 compared with IBMX control values.
Inhibitory effects of SPE, its fractions and isolated compounds from SPEE on the activity of mushroom tyrosinase
| Sample conc. | Inhibition (%)[ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| 100 μg/mL | 200 μg/mL | 500 μg/mL | |
| NC | 0.0 ± 0.1 | ||
| SPE | −4.7 ± 0.6 | −1.1 ± 2.8 | 18.3 ± 2.6 |
| SPEH | −3.9 ± 2.8 | −2.5 ± 2.9 | 3.4 ± 2.8 |
| SPED | 19.4 ± 0.6 | 24.1 ± 0.3 | 33.2 ± 2.9 |
| SPEE | 30.9 ± 1.0 | 38.1 ± 2.1 | 65.4 ± 1.8 |
|
| |||
| Inhibition (%)[ | |||
|
| |||
| 1 μg/mL | 10 μg/mL | 20 μg/mL | |
|
| |||
| 1 | 18.2 ± 1.6 | 17.0 ± 0.7 | 17.1 ± 1.3 |
| 2 | 17.2 ± 1.1 | 21.2 ± 1.0 | 21.8 ± 1.5 |
| 3 | 12.4 ± 1.8 | 14.5 ± 3.3 | 18.2 ± 3.8 |
| 4 | 11.6 ± 3.2* | 10.1 ± 2.5* | 8.0 ± 1.0 |
| 5 | 9.4 ± 1.2 | 23.3 ± 2.2 | 24.5 ± 3.5 |
| 6 | 9.2 ± 1.8 | 13.6 ± 4.7 | 17.4 ± 36 |
| 7 | 8.8 ± 2.1 | 15.3 ± 0.9 | 15.5 ± 2.4 |
| 8 | 14.5 ± 0.1 | 14.6 ± 0.8 | 17.0 ± 1.7 |
| 10 | 4.3 ± 3.1* | 7.0 ± 3.4* | 8.4 ± 2.0 |
|
| |||
| 10 μg/mL | 100 μg/mL | 500 μg/mL | |
|
| |||
| Arbutin | 8.3 ± 1.8 | 21.9 ± 1.4 | 43.8 ± 1.3 |
The inhibitory activity was determined spectrophotometrically using tyrosinase as the substrate,
Each value was expressed as the mean ± SD from the three independent experiments,
p<0.01,
p<0.001 compared with negative control.
The inhibitory effects of SPE, its fractions, and isolated compoundsfrom SPEE on the oxidation activity of l-DOPA
| Sample conc. | Inhibition (%)[ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| 100 μg/mL | 200 μg/mL | 500 μg/mL | |
| NC | 0.0 ± 0.1 | ||
| SPE | 16.2 ± 2.1 | 21.0 ± 0.3 | 21.1 ± 1.4 |
| SPEH | 3.4 ± 1.2 | 2.8 ± 2.0 | 5.3 ± 3.5 |
| SPED | 15.6 ± 2.5 | 16.5 ± 1.1 | 17.6 ± 0.3 |
| SPEE | 16.7 ± 1.9 | 24.6 ± 1.4 | 24.5 ± 1.8 |
|
| |||
| Inhibition (%)[ | |||
|
| |||
| 1 μg/mL | 10 μg/mL | 20 μg/mL | |
|
| |||
| 1 | −0.1 ± 0.5 | 16.5 ± 0.5 | 20.9 ± 1.1 |
| 2 | −3.5 ± 1.8 | 9.6 ± 3.0 | 12.2 ± 0.9 |
| 3 | −11.2 ± 2.9 | −9.3 ± 2.5 | −6.1 ± 1.7 |
| 4 | 0.4 ± 0.7 | 2.6 ± 0.9 | 1.6 ± 4.3 |
| 5 | −7.2 ± 1.2 | 9.4 ± 0.5 | 19.3 ± 23.5 |
| 6 | −8.3 ± 1.4 | 13.6 ± 1.3 | 21.8 ± 3.4 |
| 7 | −1.2 ± 0.7 | 12.9 ± 3.3 | 9.0 ± 2.0 |
| 8 | −2.6 ± 1.0 | 10.9 ± 3.4 | 11.7 ± 1.0 |
| 10 | 0.7 ± 1.1 | 12.1 ± 3.7 | 18.2 ± 1.7 |
|
| |||
| 10 μg/mL | 100 μg/mL | 500 μg/mL | |
|
| |||
| Arbutin | 1.8 ± 1.5 | 12.1 ± 2.9 | 16.7 ± 0.7 |
The inhibitory activity was determined spectrophotometrically using L-DOPA as the substrate,
Each value was expressed as the mean ± SD from the three independent experiments,
p<0.05,
p<0.01,
p<0.001 compared with negative control.
DPPH radical scavenging effects of SPE, its fractions, and isolated compounds from SPEE
| Sample conc. | DPPH radical scavenging activities (%) [ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 10 μg/mL | 20 μg/mL | 50 μg/mL | 100 μg/mL | |
| NC | 0.0 ± 0.7 | |||
| SPE | 5.4 ± 3.0 | 13.1 ± 2.6 | 31.5 ± 2.3 | 72.1 ± 1.0 |
| SPEH | −1.9 ± 3.4 | −2.1 ± 2.1 | −0.8 ± 2.8 | 0.0 ± 1.1 |
| SPED | −2.3 ± 4.1 | 4.8 ± 3.9 | 13.2 ± 3.2 | 26.3 ± 2.0 |
| SPEE | 22.2 ± 3.7 | 32.7 ± 0.7 | 76.1 ± 0.3 | 93.0 ± 0.3 |
Each value was expressed as the mean ± SD from the three independent experiments,
p<0.05,
p<0.01,
p<0.001 compared with negative control, 0.4 mM DPPH only.