Literature DB >> 25995344

Different target-discrimination times can be followed by the same saccade-initiation timing in different stimulus conditions during visual searches.

Tomohiro Tanaka1, Satoshi Nishida1, Tadashi Ogawa2.   

Abstract

The neuronal processes that underlie visual searches can be divided into two stages: target discrimination and saccade preparation/generation. This predicts that the length of time of the prediscrimination stage varies according to the search difficulty across different stimulus conditions, whereas the length of the latter postdiscrimination stage is stimulus invariant. However, recent studies have suggested that the length of the postdiscrimination interval changes with different stimulus conditions. To address whether and how the visual stimulus affects determination of the postdiscrimination interval, we recorded single-neuron activity in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) when monkeys (Macaca fuscata) performed a color-singleton search involving four stimulus conditions that differed regarding luminance (Bright vs. Dim) and target-distractor color similarity (Easy vs. Difficult). We specifically focused on comparing activities between the Bright-Difficult and Dim-Easy conditions, in which the visual stimuli were considerably different, but the mean reaction times were indistinguishable. This allowed us to examine the neuronal activity when the difference in the degree of search speed between different stimulus conditions was minimal. We found that not only prediscrimination but also postdiscrimination intervals varied across stimulus conditions: the postdiscrimination interval was longer in the Dim-Easy condition than in the Bright-Difficult condition. Further analysis revealed that the postdiscrimination interval might vary with stimulus luminance. A computer simulation using an accumulation-to-threshold model suggested that the luminance-related difference in visual response strength at discrimination time could be the cause of different postdiscrimination intervals.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LIP; discrimination time; monkey; reaction time; stimulus luminance; visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25995344      PMCID: PMC4507950          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00043.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  79 in total

1.  Effects of search efficiency on surround suppression during visual selection in frontal eye field.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Schall; Takashi R Sato; Kirk G Thompson; Amanda A Vaughn; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Saccade target selection in the superior colliculus during a visual search task.

Authors:  Robert M McPeek; Edward L Keller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Matching behavior and the representation of value in the parietal cortex.

Authors:  Leo P Sugrue; Greg S Corrado; William T Newsome
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Activity in the lateral intraparietal area predicts the goal and latency of saccades in a free-viewing visual search task.

Authors:  Anna E Ipata; Angela L Gee; Michael E Goldberg; James W Bisley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Psychophysiological evidence for continuous information transmission between visual search and response processes.

Authors:  H G Smid; W Lamain; M M Hogeboom; G Mulder; L J Mulder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The effect of visual search efficiency on response preparation: neurophysiological evidence for discrete flow.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Min-Suk Kang; Kirk Thompson; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-02

7.  Perceptual modulation of motor--but not visual--responses in the frontal eye field during an urgent-decision task.

Authors:  M Gabriela Costello; Dantong Zhu; Emilio Salinas; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Shape selectivity in primate frontal eye field.

Authors:  Xinmiao Peng; Margaret E Sereno; Amanda K Silva; Sidney R Lehky; Anne B Sereno
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Visual, presaccadic, and cognitive activation of single neurons in monkey lateral intraparietal area.

Authors:  C L Colby; J R Duhamel; M E Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  M N Shadlen; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Accumulators, Neurons, and Response Time.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Sequential sampling from memory underlies action selection during abstract decision-making.

Authors:  S Shushruth; Ariel Zylberberg; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 10.900

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.