| Literature DB >> 25994156 |
Diana R Pereira1, Patrício Costa1, João J Cerqueira2.
Abstract
The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is a widely used instrument to assess information processing speed, attention, visual scanning, and tracking. Considering that repeated evaluations are a common need in neuropsychological assessment routines, we explored test-retest reliability and practice effects of two alternate SDMT forms with a short inter-assessment interval. A total of 123 university students completed the written SDMT version in two different time points separated by a 150-min interval. Half of the participants accomplished the same form in both occasions, while the other half filled different forms. Overall, reasonable test-retest reliabilities were found (r = .70), and the subjects that completed the same form revealed significant practice effects (p < .001, dz = 1.61), which were almost non-existent in those filling different forms. These forms were found to be moderately reliable and to elicit a similar performance across participants, suggesting their utility in repeated cognitive assessments when brief inter-assessment intervals are required.Entities:
Keywords: Alternate forms; Practice effects; Repeated assessment; SDMT; Test–retest reliability
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25994156 DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acv028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Clin Neuropsychol ISSN: 0887-6177 Impact factor: 2.813