| Literature DB >> 25993697 |
Katie Greenland1, Ruth Dixon2, Shabbir Ali Khan3, Kithsiri Gunawardena4, Jimmy H Kihara5, Jennifer L Smith1, Lesley Drake6, Prerna Makkar2, Sri Raman7, Sarman Singh8, Sanjay Kumar9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Soil-transmitted helminths (STHs) infect over a billion individuals worldwide. In India, 241 million children are estimated to need deworming to avert the negative consequences STH infections can have on child health and development. In February-April 2011, 17 million children in Bihar State were dewormed during a government-led school-based deworming campaign. Prior to programme implementation, a study was conducted to assess STH prevalence in the school-age population to direct the programme. The study also investigated risk factors for STH infections, including caste, literacy, and defecation and hygiene practices, in order to inform the development of complementary interventions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25993697 PMCID: PMC4439147 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003790
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Local caste classification and adopted categories used to describe castes.
| Local Caste Classification | Adopted Caste Categories |
|---|---|
|
| Caste 1 |
|
| Caste 2 |
|
| Caste 3 |
|
| Caste 4 |
|
| Caste 5 |
|
| Caste 6 |
Fig 1Prevalence of soil-transmitted helminths in the 20 schools in Bihar.
Prevalence of soil-transmitted helminth infections among primary school children in the four surveyed districts (N = 1157).
| Number and (%) of children found positive per district | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall (N = 1157) | Araria (N = 300) | Aurangabad (N = 322) | Muzaffarpur (N = 330) | Gopalganj (N = 327) | |
|
| 600 (51.9) | 191 (72.1) | 74 (25.0) | 137 (45.7) | 198 (66.9) |
|
| 54 (4.7) | 30 (11.3) | 5 (1.7) | 15 (5.0) | 4 (1.4) |
|
| 483 (41.8) | 86 (32.5) | 119 (40.2) | 116 (38.7) | 162 (54.7) |
|
| 786 (67.9) | 211 (79.6) | 145 (49.0) | 187 (62.3) | 243 (82.1) |
|
| 456 (58.0) | 128 (60.7) | 94 (64.8) | 111 (59.4) | 123 (50.6) |
|
| 16 (5.2) | 8 (11.4) | 0 | 7 (9.9) | 1 (0.8) |
|
| 287 (92.9) | 61 (87.1) | 47 (95.9) | 62 (87.3) | 117 (98.3) |
|
| 6 (1.9) | 1 (1.4) | 2 (4.1) | 2 (2.8) | 1 (0.8) |
|
| 309 (26.7) | 70 (33.2) | 49 (33.8) | 71 (38.0) | 119 (49.0) |
|
| 21 (1.8) | 13 (6.2) | 2 (1.4) | 5 (2.7) | 1 (0.4) |
* denominators vary due to missing data
^ refers to number of children positive for at least one species of soil transmitted helminth
# Percentages calculated using the total number of children with double infections
Risk factors for hookworm and A. lumbricoides infection, Bihar India (N = 1157).
| Hookworm |
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate | Multivariate | Univariate | Multivariate | |||||||||
| N | % infected | OR (95%CI) |
| Adj. OR (95%CI) |
| % infected | OR (95%CI) |
| Adj. OR (95%CI) |
| ||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Female | 600 | 40.7 | ref. | ref. | 52.2 | ref. | ref. | |||||
| Male | 557 | 42.9 | 1.1 (0.9–1.4) | 0.186 | 1.0 (0.9–1.3) | 0.456 | 51.5 | 1.0 (0.9–1.0) | 0.301 | 1.0 (0.9–1.0) | 0.264 | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| 4–7 yrs | 308 | 40.3 | ref. | ref. | 56.2 | ref. | ||||||
| 8–11 yrs | 590 | 42.5 | 1.2 (0.9–1.5) | 0.157 | 1.2 (1.0–1.5) | 0.085 | 50.2 | 1.0 (0.9–1.2) | 0.511 | 1.0 (0.9–1.2) | 0.496 | |
| 12–17 yrs | 259 | 41.7 | 1.3 (1.0–1.6) | 0.029 | 1.3 (1.0–1.7) | 0.030 | 50.6 | 0.9 (0.8–1.1) | 0.438 | 1.0 (0.8–1.1) | 0.578 | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Caste 1 | 47 | 34.0 | ref. | ref. | 34.1 | ref. | ref. | |||||
| Caste 2 | 200 | 46.0 | 1.5 (0.9–2.6) | 0.143 | 1.2 (0.8–1.7) | 0.451 | 56.0 | 1.4 (0.8–2.5) | 0.214 | 1.3 (0.8–2.3) | 0.281 | |
| Caste 3 | 272 | 37.9 | 1.8 (1.1–2.8) | 0.017 | 1.3 (1.0–1.6) | 0.036 | 36 | 1.5 (0.8–2.7) | 0.184 | 1.4 (0.8–2.5) | 0.213 | |
| Caste 4 | 89 | 52.8 | 1.5 (0.9–2.4) | 0.104 | 1.1 (0.8–1.4) | 0.694 | 64 | 1.7 (0.9–3.2) | 0.103 | 1.6 (0.9–2.8) | 0.143 | |
| Castes 5 + 6 | 249 | 44.2 | 1.8 (1.2–2.7) | 0.005 | 1.4 (1.0–1.8) | 0.031 | 54.2 | 1.5 (0.7–3.1) | 0.273 | 1.4 (0.7–2.8) | 0.345 | |
| Muslim | 294 | 38.1 | 1.5 (1.1–2.0) | 0.004 | 1.2 (1.0–1.4) | 0.121 | 61.6 | 1.6 (0.9–3.0) | 0.112 | 1.5 (0.9–2.7) | 0.136 | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Illiterate | 855 | 44.1 | ref. | ref. | 55.8 | ref. | ref. | |||||
| Literate | 295 | 34.6 | 0.5 (0.4–0.7) | <0.001 | 0.8 (0.7–1.0) | 0.032 | 40.7 | 0.9 (0.8–1.0) | 0.081 | 0.9 (0.8–1.1) | 0.263 | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Open defecation only | 368 | 48.9 | ref. | ref. | 46.7 | ref. | ||||||
| Open defecation and latrine | 192 | 47.9 | 0.9 (0.7–1.2) | 0.567 | 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | 0.895 | 46.4 | 0.9 (0.8–1.1) | 0.236 | |||
| Latrine only | 23 | 13 | 0.4 (0.2–1.0) | 0.042 | 0.5 (0.2–1.1) | 0.097 | 30.4 | 0.8 (0.7–1.1) | 0.164 | |||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Soil, ash or water only | 591 | 40.1 | ref. | ref. | 55.7 | ref. | ref. | |||||
| Soap and ash/soil/water | 311 | 49.5 | 0.9 (0.8–1.0) | 0.010 | 1.0 (0.9–1.1) | 0.355 | 53.4 | 1.1 (1.0–1.2) | 0.184 | 1.1 (1.0–1.2) | 0.025 | |
| Soap only | 242 | 34.3 | 0.8 (0.6–1.0) | 0.099 | 0.9 (0.7–1.3) | 0.625 | 41.3 | 0.9 (0.8–1.0) | 0.084 | 0.9 (0.8–1.1) | 0.236 | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| No | 517 | 40.2 | ref. | 65.2 | ref. | ref. | ||||||
| Yes | 640 | 42.9 | 0.8 (0.6–1.2) | 0.271 | 41.1 | 0.6 (0.4–0.9) | 0.025 | 0.6 (0.4–0.9) | 0.016 | |||
RR = risk ratio, 95%CI = 95% confidence interval, P = p value. Univariate analysis takes account of clustering within schools. The model was restricted to two districts (Aurangabad and Gopalganj) due to data collection errors for some variables in the other districts.
For caste classification see Table 1. Castes 5 and 6 were combined for analysis due to small numbers. Muslims were excluded from the caste classification and are therefore presented collectively and separately.
Maternal education (literacy) was assessed by asking the child whether their mother can read their hindi textbook. The proportions of literate mothers were similar for muslims and hindus, even in urdu speaking schools. All responses are therefore included in analysis.
Defecation practice: variable created from questions pertaining to frequency (usually, sometimes, never) of use of an open field, river, jungle or latrine for defecation. Almost all open defecation (98%) takes place in an open field.
Hand-hygiene practice: 95% of individuals within the "soil, ash or water" category use only soil to hand-wash after using the toilet.