| Literature DB >> 25993297 |
Anna Hernández-Aguilera1, Julio Sepúlveda2, Esther Rodríguez-Gallego3, Maria Guirro4, Anabel García-Heredia5, Noemí Cabré6, Fedra Luciano-Mateo7, Isabel Fort-Gallifa8, Vicente Martín-Paredero9, Jorge Joven10, Jordi Camps11.
Abstract
Oxidative damage to lipids and lipoproteins is implicated in the development of atherosclerotic vascular diseases, including peripheral artery disease (PAD). The paraoxonases (PON) are a group of antioxidant enzymes, termed PON1, PON2, and PON3 that protect lipoproteins and cells from peroxidation and, as such, may be involved in protection against the atherosclerosis process. PON1 inhibits the production of chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) in endothelial cells incubated with oxidized lipoproteins. PON1 and CCL2 are ubiquitously distributed in tissues, and this suggests a joint localization and combined systemic effect. The aim of the present study has been to analyze the quantitative immunohistochemical localization of PON1, PON3, CCL2 and CCL2 receptors in a series of patients with severe PAD. Portions of femoral and/or popliteal arteries from 66 patients with PAD were obtained during surgical procedures for infra-inguinal limb revascularization. We used eight normal arteries from donors as controls. PON1 and PON3, CCL2 and the chemokine-binding protein 2, and Duffy antigen/chemokine receptor, were increased in PAD patients. There were no significant changes in C-C chemokine receptor type 2. Our findings suggest that paraoxonases and chemokines play an important role in the development and progression of atherosclerosis in peripheral artery disease.Entities:
Keywords: CCL2; chemokine receptors; chemokines; immunohistochemistry; paraoxonases
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25993297 PMCID: PMC4463702 DOI: 10.3390/ijms160511323
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Selected descriptive characteristics and laboratory variables in participants.
| Parameter | Control ( | PAD ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical characteristics | |||
| Age, years | 66 (30–76) | 70 (62–77) | 0.223 |
| Male, | 5 (62.5) | 55 (85.9) | 0.094 |
| Smokers, | 1 (14.3) | 16 (31.4) | |
| Complete blood count | |||
| Red blood cells, ×1012/L | 4.32 (3.18–4.47) | 3.67 (3.14–4.24) | 0.449 |
| Hemoglobin, g/dL | 12.46 (9.99–13.28) | 10.85 (9.45–12.93) | 0.468 |
| Leukocytes, ×109/L | 9.22 (8.58–10.17) | 9.89 (7.44–12.20) | 0.668 |
| Platelets, ×109/L | 227.5 (163.7–246.2) | 312.5 (199.0–419.0) | 0.080 |
| Biochemical variables in serum or plasma | |||
| Glucose, mmol/L | 5.77 (5.11–6.77) | 6.38 (5.11–8.83) | 0.406 |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 4.77 (3.87–6.39) | 3.39 (2.90–4.47) | |
| HDL cholesterol, mmol/L | 1.24 (0.98–1.40) | 0.93 (0.83–1.20) | 0.074 |
| LDL cholesterol, mmol/L | 3.54 (3.11–4.42) | 1.95 (1.68–2.69) | |
| Triglycerides, mmol/L | 1.47 (1.13–2.15) | 1.31 (1.00–1.87) | 0.449 |
| Fibrinogen, g/L | 5.51 (4.48–7.54) | 6.96 (5.34–8.11) | 0.237 |
| C-reactive protein, mg/L | 6.1 (0.6–7.2) | 8.1 (2.7–16.0) | 0.147 |
| Total proteins, g/L | 65 (55–68) | 60 (55–69) | 0.743 |
| CCL2, ng/L | 373.4 (255.2–431.8) | 622.8 (472.7–898.4) | < |
| PON1, mg/L | 75.4 (56.7–143.8) | 25.2 (18.4–35.8) | < |
| PON3, mg/L | 1.95 (1.51–2.50) | 1.73 (1.43–2.27) | 0.490 |
| 8-Isoprostanes, ng/L | 14.2 (2.0–37.2) | 100.8 (37.6–314.7) | < |
| PON1 lactonase activity, U/L | 5.69 (5.02–6.29) | 3.04 (2.11–3.73) | < |
The bold numbers highlight the statistically significant differences.
Differences in selected variables between control individuals and PAD patients.
| Parameter | Control ( | PAD ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMT (mm) | 1.00 (0.70–1.30) | 1.29 (1.00–1.74) | 0.150 |
| I/M ratio | 0.16 (0.13–0.65) | 2.10 (1.33–3.22) | < |
| % PON1 staining | 1.70 (1.54–3.72) | 11.19 (7.25–20.81) | < |
| % PON3 staining | 0.55 (0.22–0.73) | 3.25 (2.01–4.37) | < |
| % CCL2 staining | 2.26 (0.36–3.65) | 30.75 (9.63–44.41) | < |
| % CCR2 staining | 18.29 (7.02–27.56) | 22.99 (13.21–42.71) | 0.263 |
| % CD68 staining | 1.10 (0.65–2.88) | 4.57 (2.40–9.24) | |
| % D6 staining | 0.83 (0.22–12.9) | 41.21 (24.55–58.39) | < |
| % DARC staining | 3.29 (2.01–5.06) | 37.26 (18.06–51.85) | < |
IMT: Intima-Media thickness. Results are shown as medians and interquartile ranges. Staining for chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2), C–C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2), cluster of differentiation 68 (CD68), Duffy antigen/chemokine receptor (DARC), chemokine-binding protein 2 (D6), paraoxonase-1 (PON1) and paraoxonase-3 (PON3) were measured as the area of positive staining and expressed as percentage of the total area examined using the image analysis system (see text for details). The bold numbers highlight the statistically significant differences.
Figure 1Representative histological images of peripheral arteries: (A) Arteries stained with Hematoxylin-Eosin. The intima in affected arteries was thicker and replete with cholesterol deposits and inflammatory cells (arrow). Magnification 20×; (B) Alizarin Red staining to detect the presence of calcium. There were calcium deposits in affected arteries located, mainly, in the media and, in some cases, calcium was observed in the internal elastic lamina (arrows). Magnification 20×; (C) Masson’s Trichrome stain showing, in affected arteries, an infiltration of smooth muscle cells from the media to the intima (arrow). The lumen shows partial obstruction. Magnification 40×; (D) Actin staining to detect the presence of smooth muscle cells. The arrow shows the area of infiltration of these cells from the media to the intima. Magnification 20×. The inserts show higher magnification (100×) images of the indicated areas.
Figure 2Representative immunohistochemical images for paraoxonase-1 (PON1) and paraoxonase-3 (PON3) staining of peripheral arteries: (A) PON1 expression in normal artery was almost undetectable, and located in the media and adventitia. PON1 had two types of localization in affected arteries: when the intima was not very thick, PON1 was located in the adventitia and media of the vessels (arrow). When the intima was disorganized and with cholesterol deposits, PON1 was expressed in the lesion site (arrow); (B) PON3 expression was undetectable in normal tissue whereas, in affected arteries, PON3 was located in the adventitia or in the injury sites of the intima (arrow). Magnification 20×. The inserts show higher magnification (100×) images of the indicated areas.
Figure 3Representative immunohistochemical images for inflammatory markers in peripheral arteries: (A) Chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) was expressed in the adventitia in normal and affected arteries (arrow); (B) C–C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2) was expressed, mainly, in the media in normal and affected arteries. However, it can also be found in the intima and in adventitia of the vessels (arrow); (C) Cluster of differentiation 68 (CD68) was mildly expressed in control arteries while, in affected arteries, the expression was higher and located, mainly, in the intima (arrow); (D) Chemokine-binding protein 2 (D6) expression was found, mainly, in the adventitia; (E) Duffy antigen/chemokine receptor (DARC) was found, mainly, in the media, although it was observed as well in the adventitia and/or intima of some vessels. Magnification 20×. The inserts show higher magnification (100×) images of the indicated areas.