| Literature DB >> 25993127 |
Nura Abdullahi1, Elias Saion1, Abdul Halim Shaari1, Naif Mohammed Al-Hada1, Aysar Keiteb1.
Abstract
MWCNTs/TiO2 nanocomposite was prepared by oxidising MWCNT in H2SO4/HNO3 then decorating it with TiO2-p25 nanopowder. The composites were characterised using XRD, TEM, FT-IR PL and UV-vis spectroscopy. The TEM images have shown TiO2 nanoparticles immobilised onto the sidewalls of the MWCNTs. The UV-vis spectrum confirms that the nanocomposites can significantly absorb more light in the visible regions compared with the commercial TiO2 (P25). The catalytic activity of these nanocomposites was determined by photooxidation of MB aqueous solution in the presence of visible light. The MWCNTs/TiO2 (1:3) mass ratio showed maximum degradation efficiency. However, its activity was more favourable in alkaline and a neutral pH than an acidic medium.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25993127 PMCID: PMC4436376 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125511
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1XRD patterns of acid treated MWCNTs (a), MWCNTs/TiO2 (b) (1:1), (c) (1:2), (d)(1:3), and (e) TiO2-p25.
Fig 3TEM images of (a) Pristine MWCNTs & (b) MWCNTs/TiO2 nanocomposite.
Fig 6A normalised concentration (C/C 0); C 0 initial concentration at t = 0, C concentration at time t versus reaction time (t) for different samples tested(a); and the kinetic plots of apparent first-order linear transform ln (C /C) against time of irradiation (t) (b).
The apparent rate constant (k), photodegradation efficiency (R) and average C/Co at 10ppm MB initial concentration.
| Catalyst | K (min1) (x 10–4) | Photodegradation efficiency (R) (%) | Average C/Co |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 36 | 26.74 | 0.8298 |
|
| 59 | 41.63 | 0.7276 |
|
| 117 | 67.02 | 0.5041 |
|
| 149 | 75.96 | 0.3771 |
The apparent rate constant (k), photodegradation efficiency (R) and adjusted R-square at different MB initial concentrations.
| MB concentration (ppm) | K (min -1) (x 10–4) | Photodegradation efficiency (R) (%) | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 76 | 51.47 | 0.90735 |
|
| 101 | 63.06 | 0.90930 |
|
| 150 | 75.95 | 0.92191 |
|
| 192 | 84.99 | 0.95189 |
|
| 261 | 92.69 | 0.91050 |
Fig 7Photodegradation efficiency versus time of irradiation (a), kinetic plots of apparent first-order linear transform ln (Co/C) against time of irradiation (t) (b) under optimised conditions.
Fig 8The influence of pH on the photoactivity of the MWCNTs/TiO2 (1:3) catalyst.