| Literature DB >> 25992849 |
Xuemin Zhao1, Hailong Wang2, Jing Li1, Zhongyan Shan1, Weiping Teng1, Xiaochun Teng1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Certain epidemiological studies have suggested exposure to polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) affect the production and secretion of thyroid hormones (TH); however, conflicting results have been reported in different studies. There is not a convincing conclusion about this debate to date.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25992849 PMCID: PMC4436299 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126989
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Flowchart of the study’s selection process.
Characteristics of the included studies.
| Author | Year | N | Age | Gender | TSH/TT4 | MPPB | Nations | PBDEs-TSH | PBDEs-TT4 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b value | 95% CI | rs | r | b value | 95% CI | rs | r | ||||||||
| Chevrier | 2010 | 270 | A | F | PB-G | 25.2 | America | -0.08 | (-0.14, -0.01) | -0.18 | (-0.65, 0.30) | ||||
| -0.07 | (-0.13, 0.00) | -0.15 | (-0.60, 0.30) | ||||||||||||
| Kim-1 | 2009 | 108 | N | F/M | CB | <30 | Korea | -0.118 | |||||||
| Lin | 2011 | 54 | N | F/M | CB | <30 | China | -0.119 | -0.091 | ||||||
| -0.2 | -0.062 | ||||||||||||||
| Turyk | 2008 | 304/307 | A | M | PB | 38.4 | America | -0.1 | 0.12 | ||||||
| 0.09 | |||||||||||||||
| Han-1 | 2010 | 108 | C | F/M | PB | 664 | China | 0.392 | |||||||
| Han-2 | 2010 | 123 | C | F/M | PB | 375 | China | 0.783 | |||||||
| Stapleton | 2011 | 137 | A | F | PB-G | 36.56 | America | 0.06 | (-0.04, 0.17) | 0.11 | 0.5 | (0.06, 0.94) | 0.21 | ||
| 0.14 | 0.20 | ||||||||||||||
| Huang | 2014 | 124 | A | F/M | PB | 7.16 | China | -0.096 | |||||||
| -0.252 | |||||||||||||||
| Kim-2 | 2012 | 21 | N | F/M | CB | <30 | Korea | 0.247 | |||||||
| Chevrier | 2011 | 289 | N | F/M | PB | 25.4 | America | 0 | (-0.06, 0.06) | ||||||
| -0.01 | (-0.07, 0.04) | ||||||||||||||
| Abdelouahab-1 | 2013 | 260 | A | F | PB-G | 30.92 | Canada | 0.03 | (-0.06, 0.12) | -0.36 | (-0.56, -0.13) | ||||
| 0.05 | (-0.01, 0.07) | -0.29 | (-0.51, -0.08) | ||||||||||||
| Abdelouahab-2 | 2013 | 260 | A | F | PB-D | 30.92 | Canada | 0.01 | (-0.15, 0.18) | -0.06 | (-0.33, 0.19) | ||||
| -0.08 | (-0.25, 0.09) | 0.13 | (-0.15, 0.40) | ||||||||||||
| Abdelouahab-3 | 2013 | 260 | N | F/M | CB | 30.92 | Canada | -0.04 | (-0.12, 0.04) | -0.35 | (-0.61, -0.08) | ||||
| 0.03 | (-0.04, 0.1) | -0.23 | (-0.49, 0.03) | ||||||||||||
| Zota | 2011 | 25/24 | A | F | PB-G | 82.9 | America | 0.4 | (-0.07, 0.87) | 0.5 | (-1.04, 2.04) | ||||
| 0.24 | (-0.12, 0.6) | 0.02 | (-1.37, 1.41) | ||||||||||||
| Zhang | 2009 | 50 | A | F | PB-G | <30 | China | -0.129 | |||||||
| Xu | 2014 | 45 | C | F/M | PB | <30 | China | -0.23 | 0.03a | ||||||
| Kim-3 | 2012 | 12 | A | F | PB-D | 14 | Korea | 0.517 | |||||||
| Bloom | 2008 | 36 | A | F/M | PB | 15 | America | -0.013 | (-0.183, 0.158) | ||||||
| -0.006 | (-0.273, 0.26) | ||||||||||||||
| Kim-4 | 2013 | 105 | A | F | PB-G | 2.13 | Korea | -0.055 | (-0.318, 0.209) | 0.007 | (-0.032, 0.04) | ||||
| 0.006 | (-0.021, 0.033) | ||||||||||||||
Abbreviations: M, male; F, female; I, infant; C, child; A, adult; N, neonate; TSH, thyroid stimulating hormone; TT4, total thyroxine; PBDEs, sum of PBDE congeners; PB, samples collected from peripheral blood; CB, samples collected from cord blood; G, samples collected during gestation; D, samples collected after delivery; r, pearson correlation coefficient; rs, spearman correlation coefficient; b value, regression coefficient; 95%CI, 95% confidence interval(CI) of b value; MPPB, Median serum PBDEs levels in peripheral blood (ng/g lipid).
a data for the correlations between PBDEs and thyroid function.
bdata for the correlations between PBDE-99 and thyroid function.
cdata for the correlations between PBDE-47 and thyroid function.
dMPPB estimated by the serum median PBDEs levels in cord blood.
Fig 2Forest plots of the summary z value with corresponding 95% CIs for the correlation between PBDEs and TSH. (the random-effects model).
Fig 3Forest plots of the summary z value with corresponding 95% CIs for the correlation between PBDEs and TSH. (the fixed-effects model).
Fig 4The Begg’s funnel plot of the publication bias.
The results indicated no significant public bias (P = 0.068).
Fig 5Forest plots of the summary z value with corresponding 95% CIs for the correlation between PBDEs and TT4. (the random-effects model).
Fig 6Forest plots of the summary z value with corresponding 95% CIs for the correlation between PBDEs and TT4. (the fixed-effects model).
Fig 7The Begg’s funnel plot of the publication bias.
The results indicated no significant public bias (P = 0.696).