| Literature DB >> 25992640 |
M Victoria Lantschner1, Juan C Corley1.
Abstract
Invasive insect pests are responsible for important damage to native and plantation forests, when population outbreaks occur. Understanding the spatial pattern of attacks by forest pest populations is essential to improve our understanding of insect population dynamics and for predicting attack risk by invasives or planning pest management strategies. The woodwasp Sirex noctilio is an invasive woodwasp that has become probably the most important pest of pine plantations in the Southern Hemisphere. Our aim was to study the spatial dynamics of S. noctilio populations in Southern Argentina. Specifically we describe: (1) the spatial patterns of S. noctilio outbreaks and their relation with environmental factors at a landscape scale; and (2) characterize the spatial pattern of attacked trees at the stand scale. We surveyed the spatial distribution of S. noctilio outbreaks in three pine plantation landscapes, and we assessed potential associations with topographic variables, habitat characteristics, and distance to other outbreaks. We also looked at the spatial distribution of attacked trees in 20 stands with different levels of infestation, and assessed the relationship of attacks with stand composition and management. We found that the spatial pattern of pine stands with S. noctilio outbreaks at the landscape scale is influenced mainly by the host species present, slope aspect, and distance to other outbreaks. At a stand scale, there is strong aggregation of attacked trees in stands with intermediate infestation levels, and the degree of attacks is influenced by host species and plantation management. We conclude that the pattern of S. noctilio damage at different spatial scales is influenced by a combination of both inherent population dynamics and the underlying patterns of environmental factors. Our results have important implications for the understanding and management of invasive insect outbreaks in forest systems.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25992640 PMCID: PMC4436383 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127099
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Location of the study area in Patagonia, showing sampling sites at landscape and stand scale.
Environmental characteristics (mean ± standard error) of pine plantation stands with and without S. noctilio outbreaks in the three surveyed sites.
| Variable | Abreviation |
| CC (p) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endemic (N = 677) | Outbreak (N = 64) | |||
| Presence of | PpPres | 0.88 ± 0.01 | 0.49 ± 0.07 | -0.36 (p<0.000) |
| Presence of | PcPres | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.79 ± 0.05 | 0.45 (p<0.000) |
| Proportion | Pp1kmN | 0.463 | 0.431 | -0.03 (p>0.445) |
| Proportion | Pc1kmN | 0.108 | 0.202 | 0.19 (p<0.000) |
| Altitude (ma.s.l.) | Altitude | 1077.8 | 1084.1 | -0.07 (p<0.047) |
| Slope (°) | Slope | 12.5 ± 0.37 | 9.9 ± 0.88 | -0.02 (p>0.585) |
| Aspect (cos (45°- azimuth degrees)) | Aspect | 1.028 | 1.251 | 0.09 (p<0.012) |
| Distance to nearest outbreak (m) | DNO | 1634.6 ± 49 | 493.7 ± 107 | -0.24 (p<0.000) |
Column labels CC shows the results of Spearman correlations
Summary of variables included in five linear regression models with best fit values (AICc).
| Models | K | AICc | ΔAICc | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PcPres + Aspect + DNO | 4 | 291.3 | 0.000 | 0.420 |
| PcPres + DNO | 3 | 293.3 | 1.982 | 0.409 |
| PcPres + Slope + Aspect + DNO | 5 | 293.7 | 2.327 | 0.420 |
| PcPres + Slope + DNO | 4 | 295.5 | 4.167 | 0.409 |
Variables, number of parameters in the model (K), Akaike’s Information Criterion adjusted for small sample size (AICc), difference of AICc between a model and the model with the lowest AICc (ΔAICc), and Nagelkerke’s R2 values, are given for each model. See Table 1 for descriptions of environmental variables studied.
Parameters of the selected linear regression model (β, estándar error, and p value). See Table 1 for descriptions of environmental variables.
| Parameters | β | SE | p- value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | -3.430 | 0.441 | 0.000 |
| PcPres | 2.985 | 0.346 | 0.000 |
| Aspect | 0.490 | 0.242 | 0.043 |
| DNO | -0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Fig 2Proportion of stands with endemic and epidemic populations of S. noctilio for each aspect class.
Fig 3Relationship between the proportion of attacked trees by S. noctilio and the level of aggregation of the attack (Moran’s general autocorrelation index) for each of the 20 sampled stands.