| Literature DB >> 25992578 |
Gustavo Taboada Soldati1, Natália Hanazaki2, Marta Crivos3, Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque4.
Abstract
Greater socio-environmental instability favors the individual production of knowledge because innovations are adapted to new circumstances. Furthermore, instability stimulates the horizontal transmission of knowledge because this mechanism disseminates adapted information. This study investigates the following hypothesis: Greater socio-environmental instability favors the production of knowledge (innovation) to adapt to new situations, and socio-environmental instability stimulates the horizontal transmission of knowledge, which is a mechanism that diffuses adapted information. In addition, the present study describes "how", "when", "from whom" and the "stimulus/context", in which knowledge regarding medicinal plants is gained or transferred. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews from three groups that represented different levels of socio-environmental instability. Socio-environmental instability did not favor individual knowledge production or any cultural transmission modes, including vertical to horizontal, despite increasing the frequency of horizontal pathways. Vertical transmission was the most important knowledge transmission strategy in all of the groups in which mothers were the most common models (knowledge sources). Significantly, childhood was the most important learning stage, although learning also occurred throughout life. Direct teaching using language was notable as a knowledge transmission strategy. Illness was the main stimulus that triggered local learning. Learning modes about medicinal plants were influenced by the knowledge itself, particularly the dynamic uses of therapeutic resources.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25992578 PMCID: PMC4439025 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126389
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Social and environmental character used to fit the Bico da Pedra rural community and the land reform community Darcy Ribeiro and Renascer, Capitão Enéas, Brazil in a gradient of environmental and social stability.
| Social group | Bico da Pedra Rural community | Darcy Ribeiro land reform community | Renascer land reform community |
|---|---|---|---|
| contact with the current environment and its plant resources | old | recent | recent |
| medical safety promoted by existing medical resources in backyards | high | low | low |
| formation time | old | recent | recent |
| the kinship system | high | low | very low |
| contact with social peers | old | recent | recent |
| collective events of regional migration | none | four | six |
| families of local origin (Dry Forest) | all | ten | three |
| families originating from Savanna | none | two | five |
| families originating from urban areas | none | eight | nine |
| political expression | high | high | low |
|
|
|
|
|
The category frequencies used to analyze the production and transmission of local knowledge about medicinal plants in the community of Bico da Pedra, Darcy Ribeiro and Renascer, Capitão Enéas, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
| Category | BICO DA PEDRA | DARCY RIBEIRO | RENASCER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Learning strategies | |||
| Transmission of knowledge | 94 (a, A) | 94 (a, A) | 100 (a, A) |
| Individual production of knowledge | 1 (a, B) | 1 (a, B) | 4 (a, B) |
| Strategies of knowledge transmission | |||
| Vertical | 73 (a, A) | 73 (a, A) | 69 (b, A) |
| Horizontal | 15 (a, B) | 17 (a, B) | 31 (b, B) |
| Many-to-one | 5 (a, C) | 3 (a, C) | 0 |
| One-to-many | 2 (a, C) | 2 (a, C) | 0 |
| From whom is it learned? | |||
| Mother | 43 (a, A) | 52(a, AB) | 36 (a, B) |
| Father | 9 (b, A) | 13(b, AB) | 22 (a, B) |
| Grandparents | 9 (b, A) | 6 (b, AB) | 10 (b, B) |
| Friends or acquaintances | 6 (b, A) | 5(b, AB) | 9 (b, B) |
| Neighbors | 6 (b, A) | 12(b, AB) | 11 (b, B) |
| Uncles | 6 (b, A) | 3(c, AB) | 1 (c, B) |
| When is it learned? | |||
| Child | 52 (a, A) | 61 (b, A) | 44 (c, A) |
| Adult | 30 (a, B) | 32 (b, B) | 36 (c, A) |
| Adolescent | 13 (a, C) | 2 (b, C) | 20 (c, B) |
| How is it learned? | |||
| Teaching | 85 (a, A) | 83 (a, A) | 88 (a, A) |
| Observation | 9 (a B) | 11 (a, B) | 7 (a, B) |
| Individual experiences | 1 (a, C) | 1 (a, C) | 5 (a, C) |
| Stimulus—context | |||
| Event of illness or necessity | 80 (a, A) | 87 (a, A) | 89 (a, A) |
| Exposure to resource | 7 (a, B) | 4 (a, B) | 6 (a, B) |
| Conversations about medicinal plants | 8 (a, B) | 3 (a, B) | 5 (a, B) |
| Courses | 0 | 1 (a, C) | 0 |
The frequencies correspond to the sum of learning events for each informant in each community. The lower case letters that follow the frequencies represent the results of statistical comparisons among the communities. Different letters in the same row express a significant difference among the communities. The capital letters correspond to the results of the categories within each community. Different letters in the same column express a significant difference within the community.