Literature DB >> 25992193

Tripartite comparison of single-incision and conventional laparoscopy in cholecystectomy: A multicenter trial.

Guo-Lin He1, Ze-Sheng Jiang1, Yuan Cheng1, Qing-Bo Lai1, Chen-Jie Zhou1, Hai-Yan Liu1, Yi Gao1, Ming-Xin Pan1, Zhi-Xiang Jian1.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the characteristics of two single-incision methods, and conventional laparoscopy in cholecystectomy, and demonstrate the safety and feasibility.
METHODS: Three hundred patients with gallstones or gallbladder polyps were admitted to two clinical centers from January 2013 to January 2014 and were randomized into three groups of 100: single-incision three-device group, X-Cone group, and conventional group. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, postoperative pain, cosmetic score, length of hospitalization, and hospital costs were compared, with a follow-up duration of 1 mo.
RESULTS: A total of 142 males (47%) and 158 females (53%) were enrolled in this study. The population characteristics of these three groups is no significant differences exist in terms of age, sex, body mass index and American Society of Anesthesiology (P > 0.05). In results, there were no significant differences in blood loss, length of hospitalization, postoperative complications.The operative time in X-Cone group was significantly longer than other groups.There were significant differences in postoperative pain scores and cosmetic scores at diffent times after surgery (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: This study shows that this two single-incision methods are safe and feasible. Both methods are superior to the conventional procedure in cosmetic and pain scores.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cholecystectomy; Laparoscopic surgery; Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Year:  2015        PMID: 25992193      PMCID: PMC4436922          DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i5.540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc


  28 in total

1.  First human surgery with a novel single-port robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Single-Site platform.

Authors:  Matthew Kroh; Kevin El-Hayek; Steven Rosenblatt; Bipan Chand; Pedro Escobar; Jihad Kaouk; Sricharan Chalikonda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Review of 100 cases of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Eun Jung Koo; Soon Hwa Youn; Yang Hyun Baek; Young Hoon Roh; Hong Jo Choi; Young Hoon Kim; Ghap Joong Jung
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2012-02-27

Review 3.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a surgeon's initial experience with 56 consecutive cases and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Kurt E Roberts; Daniel Solomon; Andrew J Duffy; Robert L Bell
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in adults and children: tools and techniques.

Authors:  Todd A Ponsky
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Eric C H Lai; George P C Yang; Chung Ngai Tang; Patricia C L Yih; Oliver C Y Chan; Michael K W Li
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G Navarra; E Pozza; S Occhionorelli; P Carcoforo; I Donini
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the first 100 outpatients.

Authors:  Jose Erbella; Gary M Bunch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with routine intraoperative cholangiography and common bile duct exploration via the umbilical port.

Authors:  David Yeo; Sean Mackay; David Martin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Iatrogenic combined bile duct and right hepatic artery injury during single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Amareshwar Chiruvella; Juan M Sarmiento; John F Sweeney; Edward Lin; Steven Scott Davis
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2010 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it a plausible alternative to the traditional four-port laparoscopic approach?

Authors:  Juan Pablo Arroyo; Luis A Martín-Del-Campo; Gonzalo Torres-Villalobos
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2012-05-09
View more
  5 in total

1.  A Comparative Study of Single Incision versus Conventional Four Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Ranendra Hajong; Debobratta Hajong; Tanie Natung; Madhur Anand; Girish Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-10-01

2.  Feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Taro Ikumoto; Hidetsugu Yamagishi; Mineo Iwatate; Yasushi Sano; Masahito Kotaka; Yasuo Imai
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-12-25

3.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is responsible for increased adverse events: results of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  A Arezzo; R Passera; E Forcignanò; L Rapetti; R Cirocchi; M Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic entry techniques.

Authors:  Gaity Ahmad; Jade Baker; John Finnerty; Kevin Phillips; Andrew Watson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-18

5.  SINGLE PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: TECHNICAL ASPECTS AND RESULTS.

Authors:  Murillo de Lima Favaro; Silvio Gabor; Ruy Francisco Pimentel Pedroso; Ligia Ribeiro; Otto Mauro Rosa; Marcelo Augusto Fontenelle Ribeiro-Junior
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2018-08-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.