| Literature DB >> 25992030 |
Patricia Maria Mendes Balata1, Hilton Justino da Silva2, Kyvia Juliana Rocha de Moraes3, Leandro de Araújo Pernambuco4, Sílvia Regina Arruda de Moraes5.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Surface electromyography has been used to assess the extrinsic laryngeal muscles during chewing and swallowing, but there have been few studies assessing these muscles during phonation.Entities:
Keywords: Dysphonia; Electromyography; Laryngeal Muscles; Phonation
Year: 2013 PMID: 25992030 PMCID: PMC4423330 DOI: 10.7162/S1809-977720130003000014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol ISSN: 1809-4864
Inclusion and exclusion criteria for study selection
| Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
|---|---|
| Articles and theses produced between 1980 to 2012 in English, Portuguese, and Spanish | Studies involving functions other than phonation |
| Experimental studies, quasi-experimental studies, or non-experimental studies | Studies restricted to description and evaluation of the technicalcharacteristics of equipment |
| Studies addressing the use of SEMG as an assessment tool fornormal and abnormal human voice | Studies addressing the use of SEMG as a training tool (biofeedback) |
| Studies evaluating the extrinsic muscles of the larynxand cervical muscles during vocal tasks | Studies on patients with alterations that prevent phonation |
Figure 1.Scheme for searching and selection of works according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Analysis matrix of the included studies
| Author(s)/year/country | Type of study | Objective | Sample | Vocal tasks | SEMG procedures | Conclusion(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stepp(28)2012, USA | Review/tutorial | To establish a consensus on the methodology of surface electromyography (SEMG) use for speech and swallowing | 86 references | Not listed | -Electrode allocation in the orofacial, cervical, and infrahyoid (IH) regions | When proper care is taken for its use, SMEG has the potential for clinical use and research on speech and swallowing |
| Dietrich, Verdolini, Abbott(2)2011, USA | Non-experimental | To evaluate the influence of introversion in the vocal and extra-laryngeal behavior of vocally normal individuals as compared with extroverted subjects | 2 groups: 27 introverted normal subjects and 2 extroverted normal subjects | Vowel emission, reading, public speaking, and rest | -Allocation of 2 electrodes in the submental (n = 1) and IH (n = 1) regions, unilaterally | Introverted subjects had higher electrical activity (EA) of the IH muscles in different speaking situations |
| Van Houtte, Claeys, D'haeseleer, Wuyts, Van Lierde(26)2011, Belgium | Non-experimental | To evaluate SEMG as a diagnostic tool for muscle tension dysphonia (MTD) | 2 groups: 18 subjects with MTD and 44 normal subjects | Vowel emission, reading, and spontaneous speech | -Allocation of 3 electrodes in the submental (n = 1), IH (n = 1), and cervical sternocleidomastoid(SCM) (n= 1) regions, bilaterally | There were no differences among the groups in muscle tension evaluated by SEMG, contraindicating this method for MTD diagnosis |
| Tamplinet al.(3)2011, Australia | Non-experimental | To evaluate the impairment of vocal function by respiratory failure caused by spinal injury | 2 groups: 6 subjects with quadriplegia and 6 normal subjects | Vowel emission (high and soft loudness), reading (with and without masking), singing, and talking | -Electrode allocation in the cervical regions of the SCM and trapezius (TR), as well as the diaphragm | Respiratory deficiencies in quadriplegic subjects impaired vocal function, requiring recruitment of accessory muscles |
| Steppet al.(4)2011, USA | Non-experimental | To evaluate differences in the morphology of vocal nodules and impact on vocal function between singers and non-singers | 3 groups: 10 singers with nodules, 8 non-singers with vocal nodules, and 10 normal subjects | Vowel emission, reading, and spontaneous speech | -Allocation of 3 electrodes in the cervical SCM region (n = 1) and IH region (n = 2; divided between thethyrohyoid (TH), omohyoid (OH),sternohyoid (SH),cricothyroid (CT), and sternothyroid (STH) muscles), unilaterally | SEMG did not differentiate between singers and non-singers with nodules, showing no specificity for the presence of nodules |
| Stepp, Hillman, Heaton(12)2011, USA | Non-experimental | To evaluate the inter-muscular beta coherence of the neck regarding modulation by means of SEMG | 1 group: 10 normal subjects | Spontaneous speech, intelligible speech, speech with divided attention, singing, and hyperfunctionalspeech | - Allocation of 2 electrodes in the anterior neck region, 1 in the upper region of the neck (TH and OH) and another below (CT, SH, and STH), unilaterally- Normalization by MVA of the neck against manual counter-resistance and use of a dynamometer to maintain the strength of tongue retraction | The measurement of inter-muscular beta coherence differed between the speech tasks and hyperfunctional speech, resembling results found in patients with vocal nodules |
| Stepp et al.(13)2011, USA | Non-experimental | To compare the current classification systems of neck palpation | 1 group: 16 subjects with hyperfunctional dysphonia | Vowel emission, reading, spontaneous speech, and rest | - Allocation of 3 electrodes in the IH region (n = 2; divided between the TH, OH, and SH muscles and the SH and CT muscles) and the cervical SCM region (n = 1), unilaterally- Normalization by MVA of the neck against manual counter-resistance | The inter-rater reliability was low for capture of tension in the neck |
| Stepp, Hillman, Heaton(5)2010, USA | Non-experimental | To evaluate the inter-muscular beta coherence of the neck muscles as an indicator of hyperfunctional dysphonia | 2 groups: 18 subjects with vocal nodules and 18 normal subjects | Spontaneous speech andreading | - Allocation of 2 electrodes in the anterior IH region (right and left), divided between the TH, OH, and STH muscles and the CT and SH muscles, unilaterally- Normalization not referred to | Measurement of beta coherencein the neck muscles with SEMG can be an indicator of vocal hyperfunction |
| Stepp et al.(6)2010, USA | Non-experimental | To determine the sensitivity of SEMG for identifying changes in the degree of vocal hyperfunction | 1 group: 13 subjects with hyperfunctional dysphonia | Vowel emission, speaking, reading, and sniff maneuver | - Allocation of 3 electrodes in the IH region (n = 2; divided between the TH, OH, and SH muscles and the SH and CT muscles) and the cervical SCM region (n =1), unilaterally- Normalization by MVA with manual counter-resistance | The significance of SEMG data was not sufficient to enable the use of this tool in assessing vocal hyperfunction |
| Santos, Caria,Tosello,Bérzin(14)2010,Brazil | Non-experimental | To evaluate the effects of type of esophageal voice and use of an electronic larynx on the cervical muscles | 3 groups: 5 subjects with an electronic larynx, 5 subjects with esophageal speech,and 7 normal subjects | Spontaneous speech andreading | - Electrode allocation in the SCM and cervical paraspinal muscles, bilaterally-Standardization by the EA peak of the SCM and paraspinal muscles | Type of voice did not affect the pattern of muscle activity |
| Stepp, Heaton, Rolland, Hillman(15)2009, USA | Non-experimental | To check for electronic larynx control with SEMG | 1 group: 8 laryngectomizedsubjects | Spontaneous speech and sequence of phrases | - Allocation of 7 electrodes in the submental region (n = 1),the upper portion of the neck (n = 1), above the stoma (n = 2),the oral rima (n = 1),the masseter muscle (n = 1), and the SCM muscle (n = 1), unilaterally- Normalization not referred to | Electrodes placed in the submental and upper neck regions provided the best signals for electronic hands-free larynx control |
| Guirro et al.(16)2008, Brazil | Non-experimental | To evaluate the EA of the suprahyoid (SH), SCM, and TR muscles as well as pain and voice after transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in dysphonic subjects | 1 group: 10 dysphonic subjects | Vowel emission, spontaneous speech, and rest | -Allocation of electrodes in the SH, SCM, and TR regions, bilaterally | There was reduction of EA in the muscles investigated, as well as pain reduction and improvement in vocal quality |
| Nelli(27)2006, Brazil | Non-experimental | To analyze body posture in patients with dysphonia | 2 groups: 23 dysphonic subjects and 20 normal subjects | Vowel emission, sentence repetition, counting, and rest | -Allocation of electrodes in the SH, IH, and SCM regions, unilaterally | There was a positive correlation between dysphonia and postural change |
| Mendes, Brown, Sapienza, Rothman(17)2006, Portugal | Non-experimental | To determine if vocal training improves respiratory kinematics and muscle activity during singing | 1 group: 4 singingstudents | Singing | -Allocation of electrodes in the respiratory region of the pectoralis major (PM), rectus abdominis (RA), and external oblique (EO) muscles | Vocal training improved the force generated in the muscles evaluated |
| Pettersen, Bjørkøy, Torp, Westgaard(18)2005, Norway | Non-experimental | To investigate the intra-subject pattern activity of the SCM, scalene (SC), and upper TR muscles during the variation of loudness and pitch | 1 group: 8 singing students | Vowel emission during gliding in a comfortable or high tone, speech in a loud or comfortable tone, and singing | -Allocation of electrodes in the respiratory region of the TR muscle and the cervical region (SCM, SC), unilaterally | The SCM and SC musclesdisplayedopposing forces in the chest at high pitch and during speech rather than upon inspiration |
| Pettersen, Westgaard(19)2005, Norway | Non-experimental | To characterize the activity patterns of the neck muscles during classical singing | 1 group: 5 singers | Singing voice emission in different intensities | -Allocation of electrodes in the cervical region of the SCM and SC muscles, the posterior neck region, and the thoracic region (TX), unilaterally | Activity of the SCM, SC, and posterior region of the neck was correlated during inspiration and phonation in singers |
| Loucks et al.(20)2005, USA | To evaluate whether vocal changes resulting from mechanical disturbance are due to quick responses of the intrinsic muscles of the larynx | 1 group: 10 normal subjects | Vowel emission with pitch variation, spontaneous speech, rest, whisper, and phonation with effort | -Allocation of electrodes in the thyroid region (STH) and the medial region of the cricoid to the SCM, bilaterally | There were changes in fundamental frequencies due to STH muscle response but not intrinsic muscles | |
| Heaton et al.(21)2004, USA | Experimental | To systematically evaluate the use of SEMG for control of hands-free electronic larynxes | 1 group: 8 laryngectomized subjects | Vowel emission, connected speech, and reading | -Allocation of electrodes in the neck, unilaterally | SEMG can be an effective source for electronic larynx activation and control of voice modulation |
| Silvério(7)2002, Brazil | Non-experimental | To evaluate voice and the EA of the SCM and SH muscles in subjects with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) | 2 groups: 10 dysphonic subjects and 10 normal subjects | Vowel emission, connected speech, spontaneous speech, and rest | -Allocation of electrodes in the submandibular region of the SH muscles and the SCM region, bilaterally | The EA of the SCM was higher in subjects with MTD |
| Sapir, Baker, Larson, Ramig(22)2000, USA | Non- experimental | To evaluate variations in fundamental frequency (F0) and EA induced by mechanical disturbance of the larynx | 1 group: 19 normal subjects | Vowel emission | -Allocation of electrodes in the laryngeal region (CT), SH-digastric anterior and geniohyoid region, and IH-posterior region of the cricoid, unilaterally | Sudden and mechanical disruption varied F0 according to the direction of the stimulus and increased the EA latency |
| Hocevar-Boltezar, Janko, Zargi(8)1998,Slovenia | Non-experimental | To determine the electromyographic characteristics of the muscles of the perioral and anterior neck regions during phonation | 2 groups: 11 subjects with hyperfunctional dysphonia and 5 normal subjects | Vowel emission and rest | -Allocation of 9 electrodes in the perioral (upper and lower lips, chin), laryngeal (TH and CT), and cervical (SCM) regions, bilaterally | There was increased EA of the muscles investigated during phonation and silence in dysphonic subjects |
| Silvério(9)1998, Brazil | Non-experimental | To evaluate the EA of the SCM and TR muscles in dysphonic subjects | 2 groups: 10 dysphonic subjects and 10 normal subjects | Vowel emission, fricatives, connected speech, spontaneous speech, and rest | -Allocation of electrodes in the cervical region (SCM and TR), bilaterally | There was increased EA of the muscles investigated in dysphonic subjects |
| Laukkanen, Lindholm, Vilkman, Haataja, Alku(23)1996, Finland | Non-experimental | To evaluate the larynx and glottal source before and during the exercise of voiced bilabial fricative | 1 group: 6 normal subjects | Vowel emission | -Allocation of 2 pairs of electrodes in the thyroid region, bilaterally | The SEMG signal of laryngeal muscles proved to be reduced after exercise, indicating a lower EA and greater vocal economy |
| Larson, Sapir(24)1995, USA | Non-experimental | To evaluate the response of laryngeal and perioral reflexes to changes in affective state | 1 group: 24 soprano singers | Continuous emission | -Allocation of electrodes in the orbicularis region, bilaterally | There were no significant changes in orolaryngeal reflexes in response to changes in affective states |
| Sapir, Larson(25)1993, USA | Non-experimental | To evaluate the role of the SH muscles in vibrato control | 1 group: 4 soprano singers | - Allocation of electrodes in the SH, thyroid cartilage, mandibular branch, and upper lip regions, unilaterally | There was involvement of the SH and extra-laryngeal muscles in vibrato control | |
| Redenbaugh, Reich(10)1989, USA | Non-experimental | To evaluate absolute and relative SEMG signals in the anterior neck muscles of normal subjects and subjects with hyperfunctional dysphonia | 2 groups: 7 normal subjects and 7 subjects with hyperfunctional dysphonia | Vowel emission and reading | -Allocation of electrodes in the laryngeal region (TH), unilaterally | There were significant differences in the absolute values of the tasks, with values being higher in dysphonic subjects |
| Milutinoviæ, Lastovka, Vohradník, Janoseviæ(11) 1988, Czechoslovakia | Non-experimental | To evaluate the EA of the laryngeal, thoracic, and abdominal muscles during hyperkinetic phonation | 2 groups: 5 normal subjects and 6 subjects with hyperfunctional dysphonia | Vowel emission, reading, and spontaneous speech in a comfortable/relaxing or loud pitch | -Allocation of electrodes in the thyroid lamina, chest, and abdomen | SEMG showed increased EA of the muscles of the larynx, thorax, and abdomen in subjects with hyperkinetic dysphonia |