| Literature DB >> 25991693 |
Hadi Farsiani1,2,3, Arman Mosavat3,2,1, Saman Soleimanpour1,3,2, Mahbobeh Naderi Nasab3,2, Himen Salimizand1,3,2, Saeid Amel Jamehdar3,2, Kiarash Ghazvini3,2, Ehsan Aryan3,2, Ali-Asghar Baghani1,3,2.
Abstract
This study determined the mechanisms and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among the isolates obtained from different wards of a teaching hospital in the city of Mashhad in north-east Iran. Between January 2012 and the end of June 2012, 36 isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii were collected from different wards of Ghaem Hospital. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and epsilometer testing (E-test) were performed. The genetic resistance determinants of A, B and D classes of β-lactamases, aminoglycoside modifying enzymes (AMEs), efflux pumps and ISAba1 elements were assessed by PCR. Repetitive extragenic palindromic element (REP)-PCR was performed to find the genetic relatedness of the isolates. Colistin was the most effective antibiotic of those tested, where all isolates were susceptible. E-test results revealed high rates of resistance to imipenem, ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin. The majority of isolates (97 %) were multidrug-resistant. OXA-51, OXA-23 and tetB genes were detected in all isolates, but OXA-58, IMP and tetA were not detected. The prevalence of OXA-24, bla(TEM), bla(ADC), bla(VIM) and adeB were 64, 95, 61, 64 and 86 %, respectively. ISAba1 was found to be inserted into the 5' end of OXA-23 in 35 isolates (97 %). Of the AMEs, aadA1 (89 %) was the most prevalent, followed by aphA1 (75 %). The band patterns reproduced by REP-PCR showed that 34 out of 36 isolates belonged to one clone and two singletons were identified. The results confirmed that refractory A. baumannii isolates were widely distributed and warned the hospital infection control team to exert strict measures to control the infection. An urgent surveillance system should be implemented.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25991693 DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.000090
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Microbiol ISSN: 0022-2615 Impact factor: 2.472