Molly Elizabeth Marino1, Mark Meterko2, Elizabeth E Marfeo3, Christine M McDonough3, Alan M Jette3, Pengsheng Ni3, Kara Bogusz3, Elizabeth K Rasch4, Diane E Brandt4, Leighton Chan4. 1. Boston University School of Public Health, Health & Disability Research Institute, 715 Albany Street, T5W, Boston MA 02118, USA. Electronic address: memarino@bu.edu. 2. Boston University School of Public Health, Health & Disability Research Institute, 715 Albany Street, T5W, Boston MA 02118, USA; VA Boston Healthcare System, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Boston University School of Public Health, Health & Disability Research Institute, 715 Albany Street, T5W, Boston MA 02118, USA. 4. National Institutes of Health, Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Mark O. Hatfield Clinical Research Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB), developed for potential use by the US Social Security Administration to assess work-related function, currently consists of five multi-item scales assessing physical function and four multi-item scales assessing behavioral health function; the WD-FAB scales are administered as Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs). OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the WD-FAB Physical Function and Behavioral Health CATs. METHODS: We administered the WD-FAB scales twice, 7-10 days apart, to a sample of 376 working age adults and 316 adults with work-disability. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to measure the consistency of the scores between the two administrations. Standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC90) were also calculated to measure the scales precision and sensitivity. RESULTS: For the Physical Function CAT scales, the ICCs ranged from 0.76 to 0.89 in the working age adult sample, and 0.77-0.86 in the sample of adults with work-disability. ICCs for the Behavioral Health CAT scales ranged from 0.66 to 0.70 in the working age adult sample, and 0.77-0.80 in the adults with work-disability. The SEM ranged from 3.25 to 4.55 for the Physical Function scales and 5.27-6.97 for the Behavioral Health function scales. For all scales in both samples, the MDC90 ranged from 7.58 to 16.27. CONCLUSION: Both the Physical Function and Behavioral Health CATs of the WD-FAB demonstrated good test-retest reliability in adults with work-disability and general adult samples, a critical requirement for assessing work related functioning in disability applicants and in other contexts.
BACKGROUND: The Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB), developed for potential use by the US Social Security Administration to assess work-related function, currently consists of five multi-item scales assessing physical function and four multi-item scales assessing behavioral health function; the WD-FAB scales are administered as Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs). OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the WD-FAB Physical Function and Behavioral Health CATs. METHODS: We administered the WD-FAB scales twice, 7-10 days apart, to a sample of 376 working age adults and 316 adults with work-disability. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to measure the consistency of the scores between the two administrations. Standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC90) were also calculated to measure the scales precision and sensitivity. RESULTS: For the Physical Function CAT scales, the ICCs ranged from 0.76 to 0.89 in the working age adult sample, and 0.77-0.86 in the sample of adults with work-disability. ICCs for the Behavioral Health CAT scales ranged from 0.66 to 0.70 in the working age adult sample, and 0.77-0.80 in the adults with work-disability. The SEM ranged from 3.25 to 4.55 for the Physical Function scales and 5.27-6.97 for the Behavioral Health function scales. For all scales in both samples, the MDC90 ranged from 7.58 to 16.27. CONCLUSION: Both the Physical Function and Behavioral Health CATs of the WD-FAB demonstrated good test-retest reliability in adults with work-disability and general adult samples, a critical requirement for assessing work related functioning in disability applicants and in other contexts.
Authors: W Jack Rejeski; Edward H Ip; Anthony P Marsh; Michael E Miller; Deborah F Farmer Journal: Geriatr Gerontol Int Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 2.730
Authors: Elizabeth E Marfeo; Pengsheng Ni; Stephen M Haley; Kara Bogusz; Mark Meterko; Christine M McDonough; Leighton Chan; Elizabeth K Rasch; Diane E Brandt; Alan M Jette Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2013-03-29 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Elizabeth E Marfeo; Stephen M Haley; Alan M Jette; Susan V Eisen; Pengsheng Ni; Kara Bogusz; Mark Meterko; Christine M McDonough; Leighton Chan; Diane E Brandt; Elizabeth K Rasch Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2013-03-30 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Elizabeth E Marfeo; Pengsheng Ni; Stephen M Haley; Alan M Jette; Kara Bogusz; Mark Meterko; Christine M McDonough; Leighton Chan; Diane E Brandt; Elizabeth K Rasch Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2013-03-30 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Christine M McDonough; Alan M Jette; Pengsheng Ni; Kara Bogusz; Elizabeth E Marfeo; Diane E Brandt; Leighton Chan; Mark Meterko; Stephen M Haley; Elizabeth K Rasch Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2013-03-29 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Mark Meterko; Elizabeth E Marfeo; Christine M McDonough; Alan M Jette; Pengsheng Ni; Kara Bogusz; Elizabeth K Rasch; Diane E Brandt; Leighton Chan Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Joan E Broderick; Stefan Schneider; Doerte U Junghaenel; Joseph E Schwartz; Arthur A Stone Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Jakob B Bjorner; Matthias Rose; Barbara Gandek; Arthur A Stone; Doerte U Junghaenel; John E Ware Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Pengsheng Ni; Christine M McDonough; Alan M Jette; Kara Bogusz; Elizabeth E Marfeo; Elizabeth K Rasch; Diane E Brandt; Mark Meterko; Stephen M Haley; Leighton Chan Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2013-04-08 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Christine M McDonough; Pengsheng Ni; Kara Peterik; Elizabeth E Marfeo; Molly E Marino; Mark Meterko; Elizabeth K Rasch; Diane E Brandt; Alan M Jette; Leighton Chan Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2016-12-22 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Mark Meterko; Molly Marino; Pengsheng Ni; Elizabeth Marfeo; Christine M McDonough; Alan Jette; Kara Peterik; Elizabeth Rasch; Diane E Brandt; Leighton Chan Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Elizabeth E Marfeo; Pengsheng Ni; Christine McDonough; Kara Peterik; Molly Marino; Mark Meterko; Elizabeth K Rasch; Leighton Chan; Diane Brandt; Alan M Jette Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2018-03