Literature DB >> 25991419

Work-related measures of physical and behavioral health function: Test-retest reliability.

Molly Elizabeth Marino1, Mark Meterko2, Elizabeth E Marfeo3, Christine M McDonough3, Alan M Jette3, Pengsheng Ni3, Kara Bogusz3, Elizabeth K Rasch4, Diane E Brandt4, Leighton Chan4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB), developed for potential use by the US Social Security Administration to assess work-related function, currently consists of five multi-item scales assessing physical function and four multi-item scales assessing behavioral health function; the WD-FAB scales are administered as Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs).
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the WD-FAB Physical Function and Behavioral Health CATs.
METHODS: We administered the WD-FAB scales twice, 7-10 days apart, to a sample of 376 working age adults and 316 adults with work-disability. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to measure the consistency of the scores between the two administrations. Standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC90) were also calculated to measure the scales precision and sensitivity.
RESULTS: For the Physical Function CAT scales, the ICCs ranged from 0.76 to 0.89 in the working age adult sample, and 0.77-0.86 in the sample of adults with work-disability. ICCs for the Behavioral Health CAT scales ranged from 0.66 to 0.70 in the working age adult sample, and 0.77-0.80 in the adults with work-disability. The SEM ranged from 3.25 to 4.55 for the Physical Function scales and 5.27-6.97 for the Behavioral Health function scales. For all scales in both samples, the MDC90 ranged from 7.58 to 16.27.
CONCLUSION: Both the Physical Function and Behavioral Health CATs of the WD-FAB demonstrated good test-retest reliability in adults with work-disability and general adult samples, a critical requirement for assessing work related functioning in disability applicants and in other contexts.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-adaptive test; Disability evaluation; Psychometrics; Reliability; United States Social Security Administration

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25991419      PMCID: PMC4570870          DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Health J        ISSN: 1876-7583            Impact factor:   2.554


  19 in total

1.  Measuring disability in older adults: the International Classification System of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework.

Authors:  W Jack Rejeski; Edward H Ip; Anthony P Marsh; Michael E Miller; Deborah F Farmer
Journal:  Geriatr Gerontol Int       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.730

Review 2.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Scale refinement and initial evaluation of a behavioral health function measurement tool for work disability evaluation.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Marfeo; Pengsheng Ni; Stephen M Haley; Kara Bogusz; Mark Meterko; Christine M McDonough; Leighton Chan; Elizabeth K Rasch; Diane E Brandt; Alan M Jette
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Conceptual foundation for measures of physical function and behavioral health function for Social Security work disability evaluation.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Marfeo; Stephen M Haley; Alan M Jette; Susan V Eisen; Pengsheng Ni; Kara Bogusz; Mark Meterko; Christine M McDonough; Leighton Chan; Diane E Brandt; Elizabeth K Rasch
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Development of an instrument to measure behavioral health function for work disability: item pool construction and factor analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Marfeo; Pengsheng Ni; Stephen M Haley; Alan M Jette; Kara Bogusz; Mark Meterko; Christine M McDonough; Leighton Chan; Diane E Brandt; Elizabeth K Rasch
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Development of a self-report physical function instrument for disability assessment: item pool construction and factor analysis.

Authors:  Christine M McDonough; Alan M Jette; Pengsheng Ni; Kara Bogusz; Elizabeth E Marfeo; Diane E Brandt; Leighton Chan; Mark Meterko; Stephen M Haley; Elizabeth K Rasch
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Work disability functional assessment battery: feasibility and psychometric properties.

Authors:  Mark Meterko; Elizabeth E Marfeo; Christine M McDonough; Alan M Jette; Pengsheng Ni; Kara Bogusz; Elizabeth K Rasch; Diane E Brandt; Leighton Chan
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Validity and reliability of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system instruments in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Joan E Broderick; Stefan Schneider; Doerte U Junghaenel; Joseph E Schwartz; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.794

9.  Method of administration of PROMIS scales did not significantly impact score level, reliability, or validity.

Authors:  Jakob B Bjorner; Matthias Rose; Barbara Gandek; Arthur A Stone; Doerte U Junghaenel; John E Ware
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Development of a computer-adaptive physical function instrument for Social Security Administration disability determination.

Authors:  Pengsheng Ni; Christine M McDonough; Alan M Jette; Kara Bogusz; Elizabeth E Marfeo; Elizabeth K Rasch; Diane E Brandt; Mark Meterko; Stephen M Haley; Leighton Chan
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  4 in total

1.  Improving measures of work-related physical functioning.

Authors:  Christine M McDonough; Pengsheng Ni; Kara Peterik; Elizabeth E Marfeo; Molly E Marino; Mark Meterko; Elizabeth K Rasch; Diane E Brandt; Alan M Jette; Leighton Chan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Psychometric Evaluation of the Improved Work-Disability Functional Assessment Battery.

Authors:  Mark Meterko; Molly Marino; Pengsheng Ni; Elizabeth Marfeo; Christine M McDonough; Alan Jette; Kara Peterik; Elizabeth Rasch; Diane E Brandt; Leighton Chan
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Improving Assessment of Work Related Mental Health Function Using the Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB).

Authors:  Elizabeth E Marfeo; Pengsheng Ni; Christine McDonough; Kara Peterik; Molly Marino; Mark Meterko; Elizabeth K Rasch; Leighton Chan; Diane Brandt; Alan M Jette
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-03

4.  Regularized Bayesian calibration and scoring of the WD-FAB IRT model improves predictive performance over marginal maximum likelihood.

Authors:  Joshua C Chang; Julia Porcino; Elizabeth K Rasch; Larry Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.