Literature DB >> 25991046

Social dominance theory and medical specialty choice.

Brice Lepièce1, Christine Reynaert2, Philippe van Meerbeeck2, Valérie Dory3.   

Abstract

Understanding how medical students select their specialty is a fundamental issue for public health and educational policy makers. One of the factors that students take into account is a specialty's prestige which hinges partly on its focus on technique rather than whole person. We examine the potential of a psychological framework, social dominance theory, to explain why some students, and not others, are drawn to more prestigious, technique-oriented specialties, based on their desire for hierarchy. We conducted a cross-sectional study among medical students at Institution X (N = 359). We examined the link between medical students' characteristics i.e. social dominance orientation (SDO), gender, age, and their career intention. We also examined level of medical students' SDO at different stages of the curriculum. SDO scores were significantly associated with technique-oriented career intentions (OR 1.56; 95 % CI [1.18, 2.06]; p = 0.001). The effect was independent of gender. Medical students' SDO scores were significantly higher in later stages of the medical curriculum (F = 6.79; p = 0. 001). SDO is a significant predictor of medical students' career intention. SDO scores are higher in students during the clinical phase of the curriculum. Medical socialization, involving the internalization of implicit and explicit norms, particularly in hospital settings, is likely to underpin our findings. This theory illuminates consistent findings in the literature on specialty prestige and the influence of medical school on career choice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Career choice; Clinical clerkship; Education, medical, undergraduate; Hierarchy; Medical students; Prestige; Social dominance

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25991046     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-015-9612-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  7 in total

1.  Specialty and Lifestyle Preference Changes during Medical School.

Authors:  Jonathan P Fischer; Kimberly Clinite; Eric Sullivan; Tania M Jenkins; Christina L Bourne; Calvin Chou; Gretchen Diemer; Dana Dunne; Paul J Hartung; Doug Paauw; Shalini Reddy
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2019-08-08

2.  Relationship between sociodemographic factors and specialty destination of UK trainee doctors: a national cohort study.

Authors:  Ben Kumwenda; Jennifer Cleland; Gordon Prescott; Kim Walker; Peter Johnston
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Preventive Medicine for Person, Place, and Planet: Revisiting the Concept of High-Level Wellness in the Planetary Health Paradigm.

Authors:  Susan L Prescott; Alan C Logan; David L Katz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  LIMPRINT: A Sociological Perspective on "Chronic Edema".

Authors:  Stuart Nairn; Eleanor Dring; Aimee Aubeeluck; Isabelle Quere; Christine Moffatt
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.589

5.  Gender Differences and Influencing Factors in Specialty Choices: Findings From One Medical School in China.

Authors:  Kanhua Yin; Liu Yang; Rui Zhang; Difan Zheng; Michael S Wilkes; Yanni Lai
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-03-26

6.  A National Survey on the characteristics of Iranian General Practitioners and Their Preferred Specialty: A Need to Transition toward Preventive Medicine.

Authors:  Yaser Sarikhani; Peivand Bastani; Mohsen Bayati
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2021-07-09

7.  Relationship between sociodemographic factors and selection into UK postgraduate medical training programmes: a national cohort study.

Authors:  Ben Kumwenda; Jennifer A Cleland; Gordon J Prescott; Kim Walker; Peter W Johnston
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.