Literature DB >> 25990622

Portal Venous Stent Placement for Malignant Portal Venous Stenosis or Occlusion: Who Benefits?

Takaaki Hasegawa1, Koichiro Yamakado2, Haruyuki Takaki2, Atsuhiro Nakatsuka2, Junji Uraki2, Takashi Yamanaka2, Masashi Fujimori2, Shugo Mizuno3, Shuji Isaji3, Hajime Sakuma2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of portal venous (PV) stent placement and find groups who benefit from this procedure among patients with symptomatic PV hypertension caused by malignant tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 2001 to January 2013, 13 patients underwent PV stent placement because of PV stenosis or occlusion caused by bile duct cancer (n = 7), pancreatic cancer (n = 5), or nodal metastasis (n = 1). Technical success, changes in PV pressure gradient and palliative prognostic index (PPI) scores before and after stent placement, clinical outcomes, and complications were evaluated. RESULT: Stent was successfully placed in all patients (100 %, 13/13), lowering the mean PV pressure gradient from 12.4 ± 4.5 mmHg (range 5-20 mmHg) to 0.5 ± 0.9 mmHg (range 0-3 mmHg, p < 0.000001). Symptoms were improved in all but one patient (92.3%, 12/13). Although 10 patients (76.9%, 10/13) with pre-stent placement PPI scores lower than 6 (mean 3.5 ± 1.7, range 0-5) were discharged from the hospital, the other 3 with the pre-stent placement PPI of 6 or more (mean 7.2 ± 1.6, range 6-9.5) died within 4 weeks (range 17-28 days) without discharge. The median survival time of discharged patients was 123 days, and it was 20 days in non-discharged patients (p = 0.0001). A major procedure-related complication of intraperitoneal hemorrhage occurred in one patient (7.7%, 1/13). No significant factor was detected for the occurrence of complication.
CONCLUSION: PV stent placement is a feasible, safe, and effective technique to relieve symptomatic PV hypertension caused by malignant tumors. The PPI score might be useful to stratify patients who benefit from this procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bile duct cancer; Palliative prognostic index; Pancreatic cancer; Portal venous stent

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25990622     DOI: 10.1007/s00270-015-1123-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

1.  Portomesenteric Venous Stenting for Palliation of Ascites and Variceal Bleeding Caused by Prehepatic Portal Hypertension.

Authors:  Rahul A Sheth; Sharjeel H Sabir; Philip Parmet; Roshon Amin; Joshua D Kuban; Steven Y Huang; Armeen Mahvash; David Fogelman; Milind Javle; Michael J Wallace
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-12-28

Review 2.  Imaging-guided interventions modulating portal venous flow: Evidence and controversies.

Authors:  Roberto Cannella; Lambros Tselikas; Fréderic Douane; François Cauchy; Pierre-Emmanuel Rautou; Rafael Duran; Maxime Ronot
Journal:  JHEP Rep       Date:  2022-04-04

3.  Long-term efficacy and risk factors for stent occlusion in portal vein stent placement: a multi-institutional retrospective study.

Authors:  Hirotsugu Nakai; Hironori Shimizu; Takanori Taniguchi; Seiya Kawahara; Toshihide Yamaoka; Naoya Sasaki; Hiroyoshi Isoda; Yuji Nakamoto
Journal:  CVIR Endovasc       Date:  2022-06-16

4.  Portal vein stent placement after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Ammar Khan; Dyre Kleive; Einar Martin Aandahl; Bjarte Fosby; Pål-Dag Line; Eric Dorenberg; Steinar Guvåg; Knut Jørgen Labori
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Effect of Stent Placement on Survival in Patients with Malignant Portal Vein Stenosis: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Authors:  Dong Jae Shim; Jong Woo Kim; Doyoung Kim; Gi-Young Ko; Dong Il Gwon; Ji Hoon Shin; Yun-Jung Yang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.500

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.