Literature DB >> 25990512

Welfare of organic laying hens kept at different indoor stocking densities in a multi-tier aviary system. I: egg laying, and use of veranda and outdoor area.

S Steenfeldt1, B L Nielsen2.   

Abstract

Multi-tier aviary systems are becoming more common in organic egg production. The area on the tiers can be included in the net area available to the hens (also referred to as usable area) when calculating maximum indoor stocking densities in organic systems within the EU. In this article, results on egg production, laying behaviour and use of veranda and outdoor area are reported for organic laying hens housed in a multi-tier system with permanent access to a veranda and kept at stocking densities (D) of 6, 9 and 12 hens/m2 available floor area, with concomitant increases in the number of hens per trough, drinker, perch and nest space. In a fourth treatment, access to the top tier was blocked reducing vertical, trough and perch access at the lowest stocking density (treatment D6x). In all other aspects than stocking density, the experiment followed the EU regulations on the keeping of organic laying hens. Laying percentage was significantly lower (P<0.05) in D12 compared with the other stocking densities (90.6% v. 94.3% (± 0.7)), most likely due to the concomitant reduction in nest space and drinker availability per hen. No systematic effects of density were found on other laying variables (egg weight, eggs laid outside nests, aviary side preferences). Number of hens using the veranda increased with stocking density. Hens primarily used the range near the house (within 50 m) and hens kept at the lowest stocking density and the smallest group size appeared to use the outdoor area more extensively, based on an assessment of vegetation cover (P<0.05). For the measures reported here, the welfare consequences of increased stocking density were assessed to be minor; additional results are reported in the associated article (Steenfeldt and Nielsen, 2015).

Entities:  

Keywords:  group size; indoor stocking density; multi-tier aviary; organic layers; resource accessibility

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25990512     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731115000713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  4 in total

1.  Automated bioacoustics: methods in ecology and conservation and their potential for animal welfare monitoring.

Authors:  Michael P Mcloughlin; Rebecca Stewart; Alan G McElligott
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Individual Ranging Behaviour Patterns in Commercial Free-Range Layers as Observed through RFID Tracking.

Authors:  Hannah Larsen; Greg M Cronin; Sabine G Gebhardt-Henrich; Carolynn L Smith; Paul H Hemsworth; Jean-Loup Rault
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 3.  Welfare issues and potential solutions for laying hens in free range and organic production systems: A review based on literature and interviews.

Authors:  Claire Bonnefous; Anne Collin; Laurence A Guilloteau; Vanessa Guesdon; Christine Filliat; Sophie Réhault-Godbert; T Bas Rodenburg; Frank A M Tuyttens; Laura Warin; Sanna Steenfeldt; Lisa Baldinger; Martina Re; Raffaella Ponzio; Anna Zuliani; Pietro Venezia; Minna Väre; Patricia Parrott; Keith Walley; Jarkko K Niemi; Christine Leterrier
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-08-05

4.  Effects of indoor stocking density on performance, egg quality, and welfare status of a native chicken during 22 to 38 weeks.

Authors:  A L Geng; H G Liu; Y Zhang; J Zhang; H H Wang; Q Chu; Z X Yan
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.352

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.