Literature DB >> 25990257

Renal function improvement in liver transplant recipients after early everolimus conversion: A clinical practice cohort study in Spain.

Itxarone Bilbao1, Magdalena Salcedo2, Miguel Angel Gómez3, Carlos Jimenez4, Javier Castroagudín5, Joan Fabregat6, Carolina Almohalla7, Ignacio Herrero8, Valentín Cuervas-Mons9, Alejandra Otero10, Angel Rubín11, Manuel Miras12, Juan Rodrigo13, Trinidad Serrano14, Gonzalo Crespo15, Manuel De la Mata16, Javier Bustamante17, M Luisa Gonzalez-Dieguez18, Antonia Moreno19, Isidoro Narvaez20, Magda Guilera21.   

Abstract

A national, multicenter, retrospective study was conducted to assess the results obtained for liver transplant recipients with conversion to everolimus in daily practice. The study included 477 recipients (481 transplantations). Indications for conversion to everolimus were renal dysfunction (32.6% of cases), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; 30.2%; prophylactic treatment for 68.9%), and de novo malignancy (29.7%). The median time from transplantation to conversion to everolimus was 68.7 months for de novo malignancy, 23.8 months for renal dysfunction, and 7.1 months for HCC and other indications. During the first year of treatment, mean everolimus trough levels were 5.4 (standard deviation [SD], 2.7) ng/mL and doses remained stable (1.5 mg/day) from the first month after conversion. An everolimus monotherapy regimen was followed by 28.5% of patients at 12 months. Patients with renal dysfunction showed a glomerular filtration rate (4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) increase of 10.9 mL (baseline mean, 45.8 [SD, 25.3] versus 57.6 [SD, 27.6] mL/minute/1.73 m(2) ) at 3 months after everolimus initiation (P < 0.001), and 6.8 mL at 12 months. Improvement in renal function was higher in patients with early conversion (<1 year). Adverse events were the primary reason for discontinuation in 11.2% of cases. The probability of survival at 3 years after conversion to everolimus was 83.0%, 71.1%, and 59.5% for the renal dysfunction, de novo malignancy, and HCC groups, respectively. Everolimus is a viable option for the treatment of renal dysfunction, and earlier conversion is associated with better recovery of renal function. Prospective studies are needed to confirm advantages in patients with malignancy.
© 2015 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25990257     DOI: 10.1002/lt.24172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  8 in total

Review 1.  Protecting the Kidney in Liver Transplant Recipients: Practice-Based Recommendations From the American Society of Transplantation Liver and Intestine Community of Practice.

Authors:  J Levitsky; J G O'Leary; S Asrani; P Sharma; J Fung; A Wiseman; C U Niemann
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 2.  Oncological Impact of M-Tor Inhibitor Immunosuppressive Therapy after Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Giuseppe Tarantino; Paolo Magistri; Roberto Ballarin; Raffaele Di Francia; Massimiliano Berretta; Fabrizio Di Benedetto
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 3.  Everolimus and Malignancy after Solid Organ Transplantation: A Clinical Update.

Authors:  Hallvard Holdaas; Paolo De Simone; Andreas Zuckermann
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2016-10-11

Review 4.  Use of everolimus in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Mei-Ling Yee; Hui-Hui Tan
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2017-08-18

Review 5.  Autophagy Modulators: Mechanistic Aspects and Drug Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Shima Tavakol; Milad Ashrafizadeh; Shuo Deng; Maryam Azarian; Asghar Abdoli; Mahsa Motavaf; Delaram Poormoghadam; Hashem Khanbabaei; Elham Ghasemipour Afshar; Ali Mandegary; Abbas Pardakhty; Celestial T Yap; Reza Mohammadinejad; Alan Prem Kumar
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2019-09-25

Review 6.  Current aspects of renal dysfunction after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Mariana P Pacheco; Luiz Augusto Carneiro-D'Albuquerque; Daniel F Mazo
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2022-01-27

Review 7.  Current Status of Malignant Tumors after Organ Transplantation.

Authors:  Bairu Shen; Zhuofei Cen; Minghua Tan; Changshan Song; Xuhui Wu; Jiaqing Wang; Minqian Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Real-Life Experience of mTOR Inhibitors in Liver Transplant Recipients in a Region Where Living Donation Is Predominant.

Authors:  Pil Soo Sung; Ji Won Han; Changho Seo; Joseph Ahn; Soon Kyu Lee; Hee Chul Nam; Ho Joong Choi; Young Kyoung You; Jeong Won Jang; Jong Young Choi; Seung Kew Yoon
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 5.810

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.