Literature DB >> 25989875

[Magnetic urethral closure device. Negative outcome after implantation for the treatment of female urinary incontinence].

R Anding1, H van Ahlen, S C Müller, S Latz.   

Abstract

We report on a negative outcome after implantation of a magnetic urethral closure device, consisting of one part screwed into the pubic bone and one part as a vaginal cone, for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence grade III. Continence was never achieved for the patient. The urethra narrowed over time due to erosion and scarring and the patient started intermittent catheterization, because spontaneous micturition was not possible. The magnet was broken, the bladder neck was eroded, several fragments were found in the bladder, and numerous fragments were scattered throughout the small pelvis. Surgery consisted of removing most of the fragments, followed by bladder neck closure and suprapubic diversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25989875     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-015-3844-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  10 in total

Review 1.  Perioperative complications of Burch colposuspension.

Authors:  F Demirci; E Petri
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2000-06

2.  [Modification of the use of a magnetic device for urethral occlusion in recurrent incontinence].

Authors:  A D Grüneberger
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 3.  Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Giacomo Novara; Walter Artibani; Matthew D Barber; Christopher R Chapple; Elisabetta Costantini; Vincenzo Ficarra; Paul Hilton; Carl G Nilsson; David Waltregny
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  [Development of a magnetic urethral closure and initial clinical experiences].

Authors:  A D Grüneberger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  [Magnetic closure with colposuspension in complicated recurrent incontinence].

Authors:  A D Grüneberger
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  [Development of a magnetic urethral closure device--an animal experiment study].

Authors:  A D Grüneberger; G R Hennig
Journal:  Zentralbl Gynakol       Date:  1993

7.  A magnet system for urethral closure in females.

Authors:  A D Grüneberger; G R Hennig; F Bullemer
Journal:  J Biomed Eng       Date:  1984-04

8.  [Development of a magnetic urethral closure device. A new procedure for the treatment of female urinary incontinence].

Authors:  A D Grüneberger
Journal:  Fortschr Med       Date:  1985-05-15

9.  A magnetic urethral closure device: preliminary report of an experimental study.

Authors:  A D Grüneberger; G R Hennig
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Long-term outcomes after stress urinary incontinence surgery.

Authors:  Michele Jonsson Funk; Nazema Y Siddiqui; Amie Kawasaki; Jennifer M Wu
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.661

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.