Literature DB >> 25989854

Evaluating the efficacy of bioremediating a diesel-contaminated soil using ecotoxicological and bacterial community indices.

Leadin Salah Khudur1, Esmaeil Shahsavari1, Ana F Miranda1, Paul D Morrison1, Dayanthi Nugegoda1, Andrew S Ball2.   

Abstract

Diesel represents a common environmental contaminant as a result of operation, storage, and transportation accidents. The bioremediation of diesel in a contaminated soil is seen as an environmentally safe approach to treat contaminated land. The effectiveness of the remediation process is usually assessed by the degradation of the total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentration, without considering ecotoxicological effects. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of two bioremediation strategies in terms of reduction in TPH concentration together with ecotoxicity indices and changes in the bacterial diversity assessed using PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). The biostimulation strategy resulted in a 90 % reduction in the TPH concentration versus 78 % reduction from the natural attenuation strategy over 12 weeks incubation in a laboratory mesocosm-containing diesel-contaminated soil. In contrast, the reduction in the ecotoxicity resulting from the natural attenuation treatment using the Microtox and earthworm toxicity assays was more than double the reduction resulting from the biostimulation treatment (45 and 20 % reduction, respectively). The biostimulated treatment involved the addition of nitrogen and phosphorus in order to stimulate the microorganisms by creating an optimal C:N:P molar ratio. An increased concentration of ammonium and phosphate was detected in the biostimulated soil compared with the naturally attenuated samples before and after the remediation process. Furthermore, through PCR-DGGE, significant changes in the bacterial community were observed as a consequence of adding the nutrients together with the diesel (biostimulation), resulting in the formation of distinctly different bacterial communities in the soil subjected to the two strategies used in this study. These findings indicate the suitability of both bioremediation approaches in treating hydrocarbon-contaminated soil, particularly biostimulation. Although biostimulation represents a commercially viable bioremediation technology for use in diesel-contaminated soils, further research is required to determine the ecotoxicological impacts of the intervention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioremediation; Biostimulation; DGGE; Diesel; Ecotoxicity; Natural attenuation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25989854     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4624-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  29 in total

1.  Temporal ecological assessment of oil contaminated soils before and after bioremediation.

Authors:  P B Dorn; J P Salanitro
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 2.  The bioavailability of chemicals in soil for earthworms.

Authors:  R Lanno; J Wells; J Conder; K Bradham; N Basta
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.291

3.  Solid-phase extraction clean-up of soil and sediment extracts for the determination of various types of pollutants in a single run.

Authors:  H Dabrowska; L Dabrowski; M Biziuk; J Gaca; J Namieśnik
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 4.759

4.  Bioremediation of crude oil-contaminated soil: comparison of different biostimulation and bioaugmentation treatments.

Authors:  Yaohui Xu; Mang Lu
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 10.588

5.  Comparative bioremediation of soils contaminated with diesel oil by natural attenuation, biostimulation and bioaugmentation.

Authors:  Fatima M Bento; Flávio A O Camargo; Benedict C Okeke; William T Frankenberger
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2004-11-21       Impact factor: 9.642

6.  Re-use of remediated soils for the bioremediation of waste oil sludge.

Authors:  Tanvi H Makadia; Eric M Adetutu; Keryn L Simons; Daniel Jardine; Petra J Sheppard; Andrew S Ball
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 6.789

7.  Effects of nutrient and temperature on degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated sub-Antarctic soil.

Authors:  Frédéric Coulon; Emilien Pelletier; Lénaick Gourhant; Daniel Delille
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.086

8.  Ecotoxicity monitoring of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil during bioremediation: a case study.

Authors:  Tomás Hubálek; Simona Vosáhlová; Vít Matejů; Nora Kovácová; Cenek Novotný
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Molecular characterization of an n-alkane-degrading bacterial community and identification of a new species, Acinetobacter venetianus.

Authors:  F Di Cello; M Pepi; F Baldi; R Fani
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.992

10.  Effects of earthworm (Eisenia fetida) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw additions on selected properties of petroleum-contaminated soils.

Authors:  Mac A Callaham; Arthur J Stewart; Clara Alarcón; Sara J McMillen
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.742

View more
  4 in total

1.  Treatment of diesel-contaminated soil using thermal water vapor arc plasma.

Authors:  Dovilė Gimžauskaitė; Andrius Tamošiūnas; Simona Tučkutė; Vilma Snapkauskienė; Mindaugas Aikas; Rolandas Uscila
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Bioremediation techniques-classification based on site of application: principles, advantages, limitations and prospects.

Authors:  Christopher Chibueze Azubuike; Chioma Blaise Chikere; Gideon Chijioke Okpokwasili
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  RemScan: A tool for monitoring the bioremediation of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in contaminated soil.

Authors:  Leadin S Khudur; Andrew S Ball
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2018-07-03

Review 4.  Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contamination in Terrestrial Ecosystems-Fate and Microbial Responses.

Authors:  Adam Truskewycz; Taylor D Gundry; Leadin S Khudur; Adam Kolobaric; Mohamed Taha; Arturo Aburto-Medina; Andrew S Ball; Esmaeil Shahsavari
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.