Literature DB >> 25989817

A NOVEL SEARCH BUILDER TO EXPEDITE SEARCH STRATEGIES FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS.

Biren B Kamdar1, Pooja A Shah2, Sruthi Sakamuri3, Bharat S Kamdar4, Jiwon Oh5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Developing a search strategy for use in a systematic review is a time-consuming process requiring construction of detailed search strings using complicated syntax, followed by iterative fine-tuning and trial-and-error testing of these strings in online biomedical search engines.
METHODS: Building upon limitations of existing online-only search builders, a user-friendly computer-based tool was created to expedite search strategy development as part of production of a systematic review.
RESULTS: Search Builder 1.0 is a Microsoft Excel®-based tool that automatically assembles search strategy text strings for PubMed (www.pubmed.com) and Embase (www.embase.com), based on a list of user-defined search terms and preferences. With the click of a button, Search Builder 1.0 automatically populates the syntax needed for functional search strings, and copies the string to the clipboard for pasting into Pubmed or Embase. The offline file-based interface of Search Builder 1.0 also allows for searches to be easily shared and saved for future reference.
CONCLUSIONS: This novel, user-friendly tool can save considerable time and streamline a cumbersome step in the systematic review process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microsoft Excel; Search builder; Software tool; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25989817      PMCID: PMC4848107          DOI: 10.1017/S0266462315000136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  4 in total

1.  Estimating time to conduct a meta-analysis from number of citations retrieved.

Authors:  I E Allen; I Olkin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Victor M Montori; Marc F Swiontkowski; Deborah J Cook
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Systematic reviews need systematic searchers.

Authors:  Jessie McGowan; Margaret Sampson
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2005-01

4.  Boolean versus ranked querying for biomedical systematic reviews.

Authors:  Sarvnaz Karimi; Stefan Pohl; Falk Scholer; Lawrence Cavedon; Justin Zobel
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 2.796

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Semi-automated Tools for Systematic Searches.

Authors:  Gaelen P Adam; Byron C Wallace; Thomas A Trikalinos
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  Actigraphy to Measure Physical Activity in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kristin E Schwab; An Q To; Jennifer Chang; Bonnie Ronish; Dale M Needham; Jennifer L Martin; Biren B Kamdar
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 2.889

3.  Improving the translation of search strategies using the Polyglot Search Translator: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Justin Michael Clark; Sharon Sanders; Matthew Carter; David Honeyman; Gina Cleo; Yvonne Auld; Debbie Booth; Patrick Condron; Christine Dalais; Sarah Bateup; Bronwyn Linthwaite; Nikki May; Jo Munn; Lindy Ramsay; Kirsty Rickett; Cameron Rutter; Angela Smith; Peter Sondergeld; Margie Wallin; Mark Jones; Elaine Beller
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2020-04-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.