Literature DB >> 25989760

A comparison between orthopedic surgeon and allied health worker in pirani score.

Syed Ali Anwer Jillani1, Muhammad Zeeshan Aslam1, Muhammad Amin Chinoy1, Mansoor Ali Khan1, Anum Saleem2, Syed Kamran Ahmed1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the strength of agreement for each of the Pirani assessment categories between an orthopaedic surgeon and allied health worker on scoring clubfeet.
METHODS: The descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Indus Hospital, Karachi, from November 2012 to June 2013, comprised children below 12 months of age with untreated unilateral or bilateral clubfoot deformity an allied health worker, who was a plaster technician, was given 1-week training in the Pirani Scoring method. The feet were scored by the surgeon and the paramedic independently. SPSS 21 was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The study had 57 patients, and 92 feet were assessed. The difference between the means of score of each parameter, including the hind foot score and total score, was less than 0.09. The means of total score were found to be identical. Total Hind Foot Score was 0.48 and Total Score was 0.354. The statistical inter-observer reliability for all components was rated as substantial to moderate agreement except Equinus Rigidityand Total Score, which showed fair agreement.
CONCLUSIONS: Pirani scoring method for clubfoot assessment was found to be a reliable tool for use by plaster technicians for independent assessment of clubfoot. However, prior training and supervision in the early phase is necessary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pirani scoring, Clubfoot, Inter-observer reliability.

Year:  2014        PMID: 25989760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc        ISSN: 0030-9982            Impact factor:   0.781


  5 in total

1.  Significance Of Pirani Score at Bracing-Implications for Recognizing A Corrected Clubfoot.

Authors:  Mansoor Ali Khan; Muhammad Amin Chinoy; Rida Moosa; Syed Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017

2.  Eight-year Review of a Clubfoot Treatment Program in Pakistan With Assessment of Outcomes Using the Ponseti Technique: A Retrospective Study of 988 Patients (1,458 Clubfeet) Aged 0 to 5 Years at Enrollment.

Authors:  Sadia Ahmed; Shazia Moosa; Ammar Ali Muhammad; Sundus Iftikhar; Mansoor Ali Khan; Muhammad Amin Chinoy; Lubna Samad
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2022-04-01

3.  Interobserver variability in Pirani clubfoot severity scoring system between the orthopedic surgeons.

Authors:  Saurabh Jain; Anand Ajmera; Mahendra Solanki; Alok Verma
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Interobserver Reliability of Pirani Clubfoot Severity Scoring between an Orthopedic Surgeon, a Resident Doctor, and a Nonmedical Counsellor at a Clubfoot Clinic.

Authors:  Pulak Sharma; Rahul Verma; Sanjiv Gaur
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Interobserver reliability of Diméglio and Pirani score and their subcomponents in the evaluation of idiopathic clubfoot in a clinical setting: a need for improved scoring systems.

Authors:  C Bettuzzi; C N Abati; G Salvatori; A Zanardi; M Lampasi
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.