Véronique Provencher1,2, Marie-Josée Sirois1,2, Marie-Christine Ouellet2,3, Stéphanie Camden2, Xavier Neveu2, Nadine Allain-Boulé2, Marcel Emond2. 1. Department of Rehabilitation, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada. 2. Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Axe Santé des Populations-Pratiques Optimales en Santé, Québec, Québec, Canada. 3. Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Réadaptation et Intégration Sociale, Institut de Réadaptation en Déficience Physique de Québec, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare functional decline in activities of daily living (ADLs) of older adults visiting emergency departments (EDs) for minor injuries according to frailty and cognitive status. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Seven Canadian EDs. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 65 and older who were independent in ADLs at baseline were recruited between March 2011 and March 2013 (N=1,114). MEASUREMENTS: The Older American Resources and Services (OARS) questionnaire was completed during the ED visit or within 7 days and 3 and 6 months after a minor injury to ascertain functional decline (≥1-point drop in ADL score). Participants were considered frail based on the Canadian Study of Health and Aging Clinical Frailty Scale (≥Level 4, vulnerable). Cognitive impairment was defined as performing below cutoffs on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (<23/30) or Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (≤31/50). Four subgroups were created: frail with cognitive impairment, frail without cognitive impairment, nonfrail with cognitive impairment, nonfrail without cognitive impairment. Sociodemographic and health data were also collected. RESULTS: Information on OARS, frailty, and cognitive impairment were available for 850 at 3 months and 728 at 6 months; 19.9% of participants showed declining function at 3 months and 25.3% at 6 months. After adjusting for age, number of comorbidities, and instrumental activity of daily living disability at baseline, frail participants with cognitive impairment were at significantly greater risk of functional decline at 3 (adjusted risk ratio (aRR)=1.89; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.38-2.59) and 6 (aRR=2.09; 95% CI=1.45-3.00) months than nonfrail participants without cognitive impairment. CONCLUSION: Easy-to-administer frailty and cognitive screening tools should be included in ED assessments to identify independent older adults at high risk of functional decline after minor injury so that appropriate services may be provided to prevent deterioration in ADLs.
OBJECTIVES: To compare functional decline in activities of daily living (ADLs) of older adults visiting emergency departments (EDs) for minor injuries according to frailty and cognitive status. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Seven Canadian EDs. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 65 and older who were independent in ADLs at baseline were recruited between March 2011 and March 2013 (N=1,114). MEASUREMENTS: The Older American Resources and Services (OARS) questionnaire was completed during the ED visit or within 7 days and 3 and 6 months after a minor injury to ascertain functional decline (≥1-point drop in ADL score). Participants were considered frail based on the Canadian Study of Health and Aging Clinical Frailty Scale (≥Level 4, vulnerable). Cognitive impairment was defined as performing below cutoffs on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (<23/30) or Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (≤31/50). Four subgroups were created: frail with cognitive impairment, frail without cognitive impairment, nonfrail with cognitive impairment, nonfrail without cognitive impairment. Sociodemographic and health data were also collected. RESULTS: Information on OARS, frailty, and cognitive impairment were available for 850 at 3 months and 728 at 6 months; 19.9% of participants showed declining function at 3 months and 25.3% at 6 months. After adjusting for age, number of comorbidities, and instrumental activity of daily living disability at baseline, frail participants with cognitive impairment were at significantly greater risk of functional decline at 3 (adjusted risk ratio (aRR)=1.89; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.38-2.59) and 6 (aRR=2.09; 95% CI=1.45-3.00) months than nonfrail participants without cognitive impairment. CONCLUSION: Easy-to-administer frailty and cognitive screening tools should be included in ED assessments to identify independent older adults at high risk of functional decline after minor injury so that appropriate services may be provided to prevent deterioration in ADLs.
Authors: Mark B Snowden; Lesley E Steinman; Lucinda L Bryant; Monique M Cherrier; Kurt J Greenlund; Katherine H Leith; Cari Levy; Rebecca G Logsdon; Catherine Copeland; Mia Vogel; Lynda A Anderson; David C Atkins; Janice F Bell; Annette L Fitzpatrick Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Justine M Nagurney; William Fleischman; Ling Han; Linda Leo-Summers; Heather G Allore; Thomas M Gill Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2017-01-06 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Cynthia J Brown; Richard E Kennedy; Alexander X Lo; Courtney P Williams; Patricia Sawyer Journal: Am J Med Date: 2016-06-08 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Nataly R Espinoza Suarez; Laura E Walker; Molly M Jeffery; Jessica A Stanich; Ronna L Campbell; Christine M Lohse; Paul Y Takahashi; Fernanda Bellolio Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: M Elizabeth Wilcox; Elizabeth A Freiheit; Peter Faris; David B Hogan; Scott B Patten; Todd Anderson; William A Ghali; Merril Knudtson; Andrew Demchuk; Colleen J Maxwell Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Mary K Finta; Amy Borkenhagen; Nicole E Werner; Joyce Duckles; Craig R Sellers; Sandhya Seshadri; Denise Lampo; Manish N Shah Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2017-05-15