Literature DB >> 25989209

Direct current stimulation over the human sensorimotor cortex modulates the brain's hemodynamic response to tactile stimulation.

Ye Wang1, Ying Hao1, Junhong Zhou1, Peter J Fried2,3, Xiaoying Wang1,4, Jue Zhang1,5, Jing Fang1,5, Alvaro Pascual-Leone2,3, Brad Manor2,3,6.   

Abstract

Tactile stimuli produce afferent signals that activate specific regions of the cerebral cortex. Noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effectively modulates cortical excitability. We therefore hypothesised that a single session of tDCS targeting the sensory cortices would alter the cortical response to tactile stimuli. This hypothesis was tested with a block-design functional magnetic resonance imaging protocol designed to quantify the blood oxygen level-dependent response to controlled sinusoidal pressure stimulation applied to the right foot sole, as compared with rest, in 16 healthy young adults. Following sham tDCS, right foot sole stimulation was associated with activation bilaterally within the precentral cortex, postcentral cortex, middle and superior frontal gyri, temporal lobe (subgyral) and cingulate gyrus. Activation was also observed in the left insula, middle temporal lobe, superior parietal lobule, supramarginal gyrus and thalamus, as well as the right inferior parietal lobule and claustrum (false discovery rate corrected, P < 0.05). To explore the regional effects of tDCS, brain regions related to somatosensory processing, and cortical areas underneath each tDCS electrode, were chosen as regions of interest. Real tDCS, as compared with sham tDCS, increased the percent signal change associated with foot stimulation relative to rest in the left posterior paracentral lobule. These results indicate that tDCS acutely modulated the cortical responsiveness to controlled foot pressure stimuli in healthy adults. Further study is warranted, in both healthy individuals and patients with sensory impairments, to link tDCS-induced modulation of the cortical response to tactile stimuli with changes in somatosensory perception.
© 2015 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  sensorimotor cortex; tDCS; tactile stimuli

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25989209      PMCID: PMC4523467          DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  41 in total

Review 1.  Magnetoencephalography in the study of human somatosensory cortical processing.

Authors:  R Hari; N Forss
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Mapping of secondary somatosensory cortex activation induced by vibrational stimulation: an fMRI study.

Authors:  J A Maldjian; A Gottschalk; R S Patel; D Pincus; J A Detre; D C Alsop
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1999-04-10       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX.

Authors:  D P PURPURA; J G MCMURTRY
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Long-lasting changes in the level of the electrical activity of the cerebral cortex produced bypolarizing currents.

Authors:  L J BINDMAN; O C LIPPOLD; J W REDFEARN
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1962-11-10       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Statistical criteria in FMRI studies of multisensory integration.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2005

6.  Effects of stimulus intensity on signals from human somatosensory cortices.

Authors:  V Jousmäki; N Forss
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-10-26       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Somatosensation, circulation and stance balance in elderly dysvascular transtibial amputees.

Authors:  Tammie M Quai; Sandra G Brauer; Jennifer C Nitz
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.477

8.  Developmental and aging changes in somatosensory, auditory and visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  T Allison; A L Hume; C C Wood; W R Goff
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-07

9.  Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; S J Goodbody; M Husain
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Aging and posture control: changes in sensory organization and muscular coordination.

Authors:  M H Woollacott; A Shumway-Cook; L M Nashner
Journal:  Int J Aging Hum Dev       Date:  1986
View more
  10 in total

1.  In Vivo Modulation of the Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).

Authors:  Da Wi Shin; Jie Fan; Eric Luu; Wasem Khalid; Yifan Xia; Niranjan Khadka; Marom Bikson; Bingmei M Fu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Effects of 4 Weeks of High-Definition Transcranial Direct Stimulation and Foot Core Exercise on Foot Sensorimotor Function and Postural Control.

Authors:  Songlin Xiao; Baofeng Wang; Xini Zhang; Junhong Zhou; Weijie Fu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-01

3.  Transcranial direct current stimulation enhances foot sole somatosensation when standing in older adults.

Authors:  Junhong Zhou; On-Yee Lo; Lewis A Lipsitz; Jue Zhang; Jing Fang; Brad Manor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Shows Minimal, Measure-Specific Effects on Dynamic Postural Control in Young and Older Adults: A Double Blind, Sham-Controlled Study.

Authors:  Chesney E Craig; Michail Doumas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mechanisms and Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  James Giordano; Marom Bikson; Emily S Kappenman; Vincent P Clark; H Branch Coslett; Michael R Hamblin; Roy Hamilton; Ryan Jankord; Walter J Kozumbo; R Andrew McKinley; Michael A Nitsche; J Patrick Reilly; Jessica Richardson; Rachel Wurzman; Edward Calabrese
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Direct current stimulation of endothelial monolayers induces a transient and reversible increase in transport due to the electroosmotic effect.

Authors:  Limary M Cancel; Katherin Arias; Marom Bikson; John M Tarbell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Functional whole-brain mechanisms underlying effects of tDCS on athletic performance of male rowing athletes revealed by resting-state fMRI.

Authors:  Ming Ma; Yan Xu; Ziliang Xiang; Xi Yang; Jianye Guo; Yong Zhao; Zhenghua Hou; Yuxu Feng; Jianhuai Chen; Yonggui Yuan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-10-04

8.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Primary and Secondary Somatosensory Cortices Transiently Improves Tactile Spatial Discrimination in Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Shuhei Fujimoto; Noriko Kon; Yohei Otaka; Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Takeo Nakayama; Kunitsugu Kondo; Patrick Ragert; Satoshi Tanaka
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Commentary: "Brain-Doping," Is It a Real Threat?

Authors:  Zhiqiang Zhu; Junhong Zhou; Brad Manor; Xi Wang; Weijie Fu; Yu Liu
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Modulation of solute diffusivity in brain tissue as a novel mechanism of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

Authors:  Yifan Xia; Wasem Khalid; Zhaokai Yin; Guangyao Huang; Marom Bikson; Bingmei M Fu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.