Literature DB >> 25989204

Home for now: A mixed-methods evaluation of a short-term housing support program for homeless families.

Tatjana Meschede1, Sara Chaganti2.   

Abstract

The use of short-term rental subsidy vouchers offers a new approach to addressing the housing needs of families facing homelessness. In Massachusetts, the Family Home pilot program placed homeless families in housing instead of shelter, providing two years of rental subsidy plus support services with the goal of enabling families to maintain market rate housing. This mixed-method case study complements staff and participant interview data with participant survey and administrative data to evaluate the implementation and short-term outcomes of Family Home in one region. Data point to improved family well-being in housing but also persistent barriers to achieving longer-term housing and economic stability. Of the families who had exited the program at the end of the study, one quarter were able to retain their housing at market rate, only 9% returned to shelter, and one in five moved in with families/friends. Lack of affordable housing in a high rental cost region and jobs that pay living wages were among the major reasons that families struggled to maintain housing. This research points to the need for integrating supportive services from the program's start, including targeted workforce development, to plan for the end of the short-term rental subsidy.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Homeless families; Housing; Low-wage employment; Mixed methods evaluation; Short-term rental vouchers

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25989204     DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Program Plann        ISSN: 0149-7189


  3 in total

1.  Improving access and continuity of care for homeless people: how could general practitioners effectively contribute? Results from a mixed study.

Authors:  Maeva Jego; Dominique Grassineau; Hubert Balique; Anderson Loundou; Roland Sambuc; Alexandre Daguzan; Gaetan Gentile; Stéphanie Gentile
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Multiple and mixed methods in formative evaluation: Is more better? Reflections from a South African study.

Authors:  Willem Odendaal; Salla Atkins; Simon Lewin
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Using a mHealth system to recall and refer existing clients and refer community members with health concerns to primary healthcare facilities in South Africa: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Willem Odendaal; Simon Lewin; Brian McKinstry; Mark Tomlinson; Esme Jordaan; Mikateko Mazinu; Pam Haig; Anna Thorson; Salla Atkins
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.