Literature DB >> 25989059

Fitness components of Drosophila melanogaster developed on a standard laboratory diet or a typical natural food source.

Torsten Nygaard Kristensen1, Astrid Kallestrup Henningsen2, Christian Aastrup2, Mads Bech-Hansen2, Lise B Hoberg Bjerre2, Benjamin Carlsen2, Marie Hagstrup2, Sofie Graarup Jensen2, Pernille Karlsen2, Line Kristensen2, Cecillie Lundsgaard2, Tine Møller2, Lise D Nielsen2, Camilla Starcke2, Christine Riisager Sørensen2, Mads Fristrup Schou3.   

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster is often used as a model organism in evolutionary biology and ecophysiology to study evolutionary processes and their physiological mechanisms. Diets used to feed Drosophila cultures differ between laboratories and are often nutritious and distinct from food sources in the natural habitat. Here we rear D. melanogaster on a standard diet used in our laboratory and a field diet composed of decomposing apples collected in the field. Flies developed on these two diet compositions are tested for heat, cold, desiccation, and starvation resistance as well as developmental time, dry body mass and fat percentage. The nutritional compositions of the standard and field diets were analyzed, and discussed in relation to the phenotypic observations. Results showed marked differences in phenotype of flies from the two types of diets. Flies reared on the field diet are more starvation resistant and they are smaller, leaner, and have lower heat resistance compared to flies reared on the standard diet. Sex specific effects of diet type are observed for several of the investigated traits and the strong sexual dimorphism usually observed in desiccation resistance in D. melanogaster disappeared when rearing the flies on the field diet. Based on our results we conclude that care should be taken in extrapolating results from one type of diet to another and especially from laboratory to field diets.
© 2015 Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diet; field fitness; life-history traits; nutrition; stress resistance

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25989059     DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.12239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Insect Sci        ISSN: 1672-9609            Impact factor:   3.262


  10 in total

1.  Evolution and plasticity of thermal performance: an analysis of variation in thermal tolerance and fitness in 22 Drosophila species.

Authors:  Heidi J MacLean; Jesper G Sørensen; Torsten N Kristensen; Volker Loeschcke; Kristian Beedholm; Vanessa Kellermann; Johannes Overgaard
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Heat hardening capacity in Drosophila melanogaster is life stage-specific and juveniles show the highest plasticity.

Authors:  Neda N Moghadam; Tarmo Ketola; Cino Pertoldi; Simon Bahrndorff; Torsten N Kristensen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Genetic Signatures of Drug Response Variability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Palle Duun Rohde; Iben Ravnborg Jensen; Pernille Merete Sarup; Michael Ørsted; Ditte Demontis; Peter Sørensen; Torsten Nygaard Kristensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Metabolic and immunological responses of Drosophila melanogaster to dietary restriction and bacterial infection differ substantially between genotypes in a population.

Authors:  Wesam S Meshrif; Sandy H Elkayal; Mohamed A Soliman; Amal I Seif; Thomas Roeder
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.167

5.  Prediction of complex phenotypes using the Drosophila melanogaster metabolome.

Authors:  Palle Duun Rohde; Torsten Nygaard Kristensen; Pernille Sarup; Joaquin Muñoz; Anders Malmendal
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Detecting purging of inbreeding depression by a slow rate of inbreeding for various traits: the impact of environmental and experimental conditions.

Authors:  Jørgen Bundgaard; Volker Loeschcke; Mads Fristrup Schou; Kuke R Bijlsma
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.832

7.  The cuticle inward barrier in Drosophila melanogaster is shaped by mitochondrial and nuclear genotypes and a sex-specific effect of diet.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Ralph Dobler; Damian K Dowling; Bernard Moussian
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  The importance of environmental microbes for Drosophila melanogaster during seasonal macronutrient variability.

Authors:  Lucy Rebecca Davies; Volker Loeschcke; Mads F Schou; Andreas Schramm; Torsten N Kristensen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Nutritional phenotype underlines the performance trade-offs of Drosophila suzukii on different fruit diets.

Authors:  Runhang Shu; Laurice Uy; Adam Chun-Nin Wong
Journal:  Curr Res Insect Sci       Date:  2021-12-16

10.  Genotype and Trait Specific Responses to Rapamycin Intake in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Palle Duun Rohde; Asbjørn Bøcker; Caroline Amalie Bastholm Jensen; Anne Louise Bergstrøm; Morten Ib Juul Madsen; Sandra Læsø Christensen; Steffan Balling Villadsen; Torsten Nygaard Kristensen
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 2.769

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.