BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Few neuropharmacological model systems use human neurons. Moreover, available test systems rarely reflect functional roles of co-cultured glial cells. There is no human in vitro counterpart of the widely used 1-methyl-4-phenyl-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) mouse model of Parkinson's disease EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We generated such a model by growing an intricate network of human dopaminergic neurons on a dense layer of astrocytes. In these co-cultures, MPTP was metabolized to 1-methyl-4-phenyl-pyridinium (MPP(+) ) by the glial cells, and the toxic metabolite was taken up through the dopamine transporter into neurons. Cell viability was measured biochemically and by quantitative neurite imaging, siRNA techniques were also used. KEY RESULTS: We initially characterized the activation of PARP. As in mouse models, MPTP exposure induced (poly-ADP-ribose) synthesis and neurodegeneration was blocked by PARP inhibitors. Several different putative neuroprotectants were then compared in mono-cultures and co-cultures. Rho kinase inhibitors worked in both models; CEP1347, ascorbic acid or a caspase inhibitor protected mono-cultures from MPP(+) toxicity, but did not protect co-cultures, when used alone or in combination. Application of GSSG prevented degeneration in co-cultures, but not in mono-cultures. The surprisingly different pharmacological profiles of the models suggest that the presence of glial cells, and the in situ generation of the toxic metabolite MPP(+) within the layered cultures played an important role in neuroprotection. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our new model system is a closer model of human brain tissue than conventional cultures. Its use for screening of candidate neuroprotectants may increase the predictiveness of a test battery.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Few neuropharmacological model systems use human neurons. Moreover, available test systems rarely reflect functional roles of co-cultured glial cells. There is no human in vitro counterpart of the widely used 1-methyl-4-phenyl-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) mouse model of Parkinson's disease EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We generated such a model by growing an intricate network of human dopaminergic neurons on a dense layer of astrocytes. In these co-cultures, MPTP was metabolized to 1-methyl-4-phenyl-pyridinium (MPP(+) ) by the glial cells, and the toxic metabolite was taken up through the dopamine transporter into neurons. Cell viability was measured biochemically and by quantitative neurite imaging, siRNA techniques were also used. KEY RESULTS: We initially characterized the activation of PARP. As in mouse models, MPTP exposure induced (poly-ADP-ribose) synthesis and neurodegeneration was blocked by PARP inhibitors. Several different putative neuroprotectants were then compared in mono-cultures and co-cultures. Rho kinase inhibitors worked in both models; CEP1347, ascorbic acid or a caspase inhibitor protected mono-cultures from MPP(+) toxicity, but did not protect co-cultures, when used alone or in combination. Application of GSSG prevented degeneration in co-cultures, but not in mono-cultures. The surprisingly different pharmacological profiles of the models suggest that the presence of glial cells, and the in situ generation of the toxic metabolite MPP(+) within the layered cultures played an important role in neuroprotection. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our new model system is a closer model of human brain tissue than conventional cultures. Its use for screening of candidate neuroprotectants may increase the predictiveness of a test battery.
Authors: Stephen P H Alexander; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Michael Spedding; John A Peters; Anthony J Harmar Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Jan M F Fischer; Oliver Popp; Daniel Gebhard; Sebastian Veith; Arthur Fischbach; Sascha Beneke; Alfred Leitenstorfer; Jörg Bergemann; Martin Scheffner; Elisa Ferrando-May; Aswin Mangerich; Alexander Bürkle Journal: FEBS J Date: 2014-07-21 Impact factor: 5.542
Authors: Peter Reinhardt; Michael Glatza; Kathrin Hemmer; Yaroslav Tsytsyura; Cora S Thiel; Susanne Höing; Sören Moritz; Juan A Parga; Lydia Wagner; Jan M Bruder; Guangming Wu; Benjamin Schmid; Albrecht Röpke; Jürgen Klingauf; Jens C Schwamborn; Thomas Gasser; Hans R Schöler; Jared Sterneckert Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lars Tönges; Tobias Frank; Lars Tatenhorst; Kim A Saal; Jan C Koch; Éva M Szego; Mathias Bähr; Jochen H Weishaupt; Paul Lingor Journal: Brain Date: 2012-10-19 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Johannes Delp; Melina Funke; Franziska Rudolf; Andrea Cediel; Susanne Hougaard Bennekou; Wanda van der Stel; Giada Carta; Paul Jennings; Cosimo Toma; Iain Gardner; Bob van de Water; Anna Forsby; Marcel Leist Journal: Arch Toxicol Date: 2019-06-12 Impact factor: 5.153
Authors: Jason R Richardson; Vanessa Fitsanakis; Remco H S Westerink; Anumantha G Kanthasamy Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Daniel Simão; Ana P Terrasso; Ana P Teixeira; Catarina Brito; Ursula Sonnewald; Paula M Alves Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Michael Aschner; Sandra Ceccatelli; Mardas Daneshian; Ellen Fritsche; Nina Hasiwa; Thomas Hartung; Helena T Hogberg; Marcel Leist; Abby Li; William R Mundi; Stephanie Padilla; Aldert H Piersma; Anna Bal-Price; Andrea Seiler; Remco H Westerink; Bastian Zimmer; Pamela J Lein Journal: ALTEX Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 6.043