Alaina J Brown1, Charlotte C Sun2, Diana L Urbauer3, Diane C Bodurka2, Premal H Thaker4, Lois M Ramondetta2. 1. Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States. Electronic address: AJBrown@mdanderson.org. 2. Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States. 3. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States. 4. Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate if an individual's locus of control (LOC) predicts various quality of life (QOL) and mental well-being measures. To identify targets that might enhance the overall spiritual well-being and QOL of ovarian cancer patients. METHODS: Multi-site analysis of women with newly diagnosed stages II-IV ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer. Patients completed the following surveys: Locus of Control Scale (LOC), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Ovarian (FACT-O), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual (FACIT-Sp), Edmonton Symptom Assessment score (ESAS), Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), Templer's Death Anxiety Scale (DAS), and Herth Hope Index (HHI). Regression models were created to examine the effect of LOC upon QOL, symptoms, and other measures of mental well-being. These models adjusted for the effect of site of care, race, and partnership status as potential confounders. RESULTS: This study enrolled 104 patients from three separate treatment facilities. After adjusting for site, race and partnership status, higher levels of external LOC predicted decreased QOL (FACT-O) (p<0.05). Higher levels of external LOC also correlated with increased death anxiety and general anxiety (p≤0.05). Additionally, higher levels of external LOC predicted decreased hope (HHI) (p≤0.01). DISCUSSION: Ovarian cancer patients with a high external LOC may be at risk for decreased QOL at the time of their cancer diagnosis. They may also experience higher levels of anxiety and decreased feelings of hope. Identification of these women and interventions designed to increase a woman's sense of control over her situation may improve QOL and overall mental well-being.
PURPOSE: To evaluate if an individual's locus of control (LOC) predicts various quality of life (QOL) and mental well-being measures. To identify targets that might enhance the overall spiritual well-being and QOL of ovarian cancerpatients. METHODS: Multi-site analysis of women with newly diagnosed stages II-IV ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer. Patients completed the following surveys: Locus of Control Scale (LOC), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Ovarian (FACT-O), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual (FACIT-Sp), Edmonton Symptom Assessment score (ESAS), Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), Templer's Death Anxiety Scale (DAS), and Herth Hope Index (HHI). Regression models were created to examine the effect of LOC upon QOL, symptoms, and other measures of mental well-being. These models adjusted for the effect of site of care, race, and partnership status as potential confounders. RESULTS: This study enrolled 104 patients from three separate treatment facilities. After adjusting for site, race and partnership status, higher levels of external LOC predicted decreased QOL (FACT-O) (p<0.05). Higher levels of external LOC also correlated with increased death anxiety and general anxiety (p≤0.05). Additionally, higher levels of external LOC predicted decreased hope (HHI) (p≤0.01). DISCUSSION: Ovarian cancerpatients with a high external LOC may be at risk for decreased QOL at the time of their cancer diagnosis. They may also experience higher levels of anxiety and decreased feelings of hope. Identification of these women and interventions designed to increase a woman's sense of control over her situation may improve QOL and overall mental well-being.
Authors: Alaina J Brown; Premal H Thaker; Charlotte C Sun; Diana L Urbauer; Eduardo Bruera; Diane C Bodurka; Lois M Ramondetta Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Michael G Cohen; Andrew D Althouse; Robert M Arnold; Hailey W Bulls; Douglas B White; Edward Chu; Margaret Q Rosenzweig; Kenneth J Smith; Yael Schenker Journal: Cancer Date: 2021-11-17 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Mackenzi Pergolotti; Antoine Bailliard; Lauren McCarthy; Erica Farley; Kelley R Covington; Kemi M Doll Journal: Am J Occup Ther Date: 2020 May/Jun
Authors: Maria Sansoni; Giovanni Scarzello; Silvia Serino; Elena Groff; Giuseppe Riva Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2022-08-03 Impact factor: 3.473
Authors: Ruben D Vromans; Saar Hommes; Felix J Clouth; Deborah N N Lo-Fo-Wong; Xander A A M Verbeek; Lonneke van de Poll-Franse; Steffen Pauws; Emiel Krahmer Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2022-10-05 Impact factor: 3.298
Authors: Michael G Cohen; Andrew D Althouse; Robert M Arnold; Hailey W Bulls; Douglas White; Edward Chu; Margaret Rosenzweig; Kenneth Smith; Yael Schenker Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2020-06-12