Literature DB >> 25988630

The evolution of perioperative transfusion testing and blood ordering.

Marissa J White1, Sprague W Hazard, Steven M Frank, Joan S Boyd, Elizabeth C Wick, Paul M Ness, Aaron A R Tobian.   

Abstract

The evolution of modern anesthesia and surgical practices has been accompanied by enhanced supportive procedures in blood banking and transfusion medicine. There is increased focus on the preparation and the use of blood components including, but not limited to, preventing unnecessary type and screen/crossmatch orders, decreasing the time required to provide compatible red blood cells (RBCs), and reducing the waste of limited blood and personnel resources. The aim of this review is to help the anesthesiologist and surgical staff identify patients at highest risk for surgical bleeding. In addition, this review examines how anesthesia and transfusion medicine can efficiently and safely allocate blood components for surgical patients who require transfusions. The following databases were searched: PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library from January 1970 through March 2014. Subsequent reference searches of retrieved articles were also assessed. Several innovations have drastically changed the procedures by which blood is ordered, inventoried, and the speed in which blood is delivered for patient care. Before entering an operating room, patient blood management provides guidance to clinicians about when and how to treat preoperative anemia and intra- and postoperative strategies to limit the patient's exposure to blood components. Timely updates of the recommendations for blood orders (maximum surgical blood ordering schedule) have enhanced preoperative decision making regarding the appropriateness of the type and screen versus the type and crossmatch order. The updated maximum surgical blood ordering schedule reflects modern practices, such as laparoscopy, improved surgical techniques, and use of hemostatic agents resulting in a more streamlined process for ordering and obtaining RBCs. The electronic (computer) crossmatch and electronic remote blood issue have also dramatically reduced the amount of time required to obtain crossmatch-compatible RBCs when compared with the more traditional serologic crossmatch methods. These changes in blood banking methods have resulted in more efficient delivery of blood to surgical patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25988630     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  4 in total

1.  Reducing unnecessary crossmatching for hip fracture patients by accounting for preoperative hemoglobin concentration.

Authors:  Raj M Amin; Varun Puvanesarajah; Yash P Chaudhry; Matthew J Best; Sandesh S Rao; Steven M Frank; Erik A Hasenboehler
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-18

2.  Evaluation of the use of blood in surgeries as a tool to change patterns for requesting blood product reserves.

Authors:  Sibia Soraya Marcondes; Antônio Roberto Carrareto; Maria da Penha Zago-Gomes; Maria do Perpétuo Socorro Vendramini Orletti; Anisia Carla Zucoloto Loureiro Novaes
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.365

3.  Therapeutic Plasma Exchange Ameliorates Incompatible Crossmatches.

Authors:  Mehmet Özen; Sinan Erkul; Gülen Sezer Alptekin Erkul; Özlem Genç; Engin Akgül; Ahmet Hakan Vural
Journal:  Turk J Haematol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.831

4.  Improving blood product utilization at an ambulatory surgery center: a retrospective cohort study on 50 patients with lumbar disc replacement.

Authors:  Benjamin C Dorenkamp; Madisen K Janssen; Michael E Janssen
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2019-12-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.