Literature DB >> 25988286

Flash Flood Risks and Warning Decisions: A Mental Models Study of Forecasters, Public Officials, and Media Broadcasters in Boulder, Colorado.

Rebecca E Morss1, Julie L Demuth1, Ann Bostrom2, Jeffrey K Lazo3, Heather Lazrus1.   

Abstract

Timely warning communication and decision making are critical for reducing harm from flash flooding. To help understand and improve extreme weather risk communication and management, this study uses a mental models research approach to investigate the flash flood warning system and its risk decision context. Data were collected in the Boulder, Colorado area from mental models interviews with forecasters, public officials, and media broadcasters, who each make important interacting decisions in the warning system, and from a group modeling session with forecasters. Analysis of the data informed development of a decision-focused model of the flash flood warning system that integrates the professionals' perspectives. Comparative analysis of individual and group data with this model characterizes how these professionals conceptualize flash flood risks and associated uncertainty; create and disseminate flash flood warning information; and perceive how warning information is (and should be) used in their own and others' decisions. The analysis indicates that warning system functioning would benefit from professionals developing a clearer, shared understanding of flash flood risks and the warning system, across their areas of expertise and job roles. Given the challenges in risk communication and decision making for complex, rapidly evolving hazards such as flash floods, another priority is development of improved warning content to help members of the public protect themselves when needed. Also important is professional communication with members of the public about allocation of responsibilities for managing flash flood risks, as well as improved system-wide management of uncertainty in decisions.
© 2015 Society for Risk Analysis.

Keywords:  Expertise; flash flooding; mental models; risk communication; warning

Year:  2015        PMID: 25988286     DOI: 10.1111/risa.12403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  2 in total

Review 1.  Pharmaceutical Benefit-Risk Communication Tools: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Dominic Way; Hortense Blazsin; Ragnar Löfstedt; Frederic Bouder
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  A Strategy Study on Risk Communication of Pandemic Influenza: A Mental Model Study of College Students in Beijing.

Authors:  Honglin Yang; Xiaoping Pang; Bo Zheng; Linxian Wang; Yadong Wang; Shuai Du; Xinyi Lu
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-09-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.