Literature DB >> 25988274

Visualization and Interpretation of Support Vector Machine Activity Predictions.

Jenny Balfer1, Jürgen Bajorath1.   

Abstract

Support vector machines (SVMs) are among the preferred machine learning algorithms for virtual compound screening and activity prediction because of their frequently observed high performance levels. However, a well-known conundrum of SVMs (and other supervised learning methods) is the black box character of their predictions, which makes it difficult to understand why models succeed or fail. Herein we introduce an approach to rationalize the performance of SVM models based upon the Tanimoto kernel compared with the linear kernel. Model comparison and interpretation are facilitated by a visualization technique, making it possible to identify descriptor features that determine compound activity predictions. An implementation of the methodology has been made freely available.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25988274     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  11 in total

1.  Interpretation of machine learning models using shapley values: application to compound potency and multi-target activity predictions.

Authors:  Raquel Rodríguez-Pérez; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Data structures for computational compound promiscuity analysis and exemplary applications to inhibitors of the human kinome.

Authors:  Filip Miljković; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Calculation of exact Shapley values for support vector machines with Tanimoto kernel enables model interpretation.

Authors:  Christian Feldmann; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-08-27

4.  Evolution of Support Vector Machine and Regression Modeling in Chemoinformatics and Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Raquel Rodríguez-Pérez; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 4.179

5.  Shallow Representation Learning via Kernel PCA Improves QSAR Modelability.

Authors:  Stefano E Rensi; Russ B Altman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Learning To Predict Reaction Conditions: Relationships between Solvent, Molecular Structure, and Catalyst.

Authors:  Eric Walker; Joshua Kammeraad; Jonathan Goetz; Michael T Robo; Ambuj Tewari; Paul M Zimmerman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Support Vector Machine Classification and Regression Prioritize Different Structural Features for Binary Compound Activity and Potency Value Prediction.

Authors:  Raquel Rodríguez-Pérez; Martin Vogt; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2017-10-04

8.  Predicting Isoform-Selective Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors via Machine Learning and Rationalizing Structural Features Important for Selectivity.

Authors:  Salvatore Galati; Dimitar Yonchev; Raquel Rodríguez-Pérez; Martin Vogt; Tiziano Tuccinardi; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-01-26

9.  Explainable machine learning predictions of dual-target compounds reveal characteristic structural features.

Authors:  Christian Feldmann; Maren Philipps; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Feature importance correlation from machine learning indicates functional relationships between proteins and similar compound binding characteristics.

Authors:  Raquel Rodríguez-Pérez; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.