| Literature DB >> 25988005 |
Abstract
Globally, there are a number of treatments indicated for the control of invasive alien plant species like parthenium. The production and use of vermicomposts from weeds or other wastes in agriculture is economical and eco-friendly. The unique advantage of using vermicomposting is that it helps to build and sustain soil condition and fertility for sustainable agricultural activities. The present study was an attempt to produce the vermicompost from Parthenium, farm and animal wastes and to analyze its nutrient content and suitability to be used as manure. The raw materials Parthenium, farm and animal wastes were collected and decomposed by tank method using Eisenia foetida. There were four different treatments in three replications of parthenium mixed with farm wastes and animal manures @10:1:1 ratio. The pH, organic carbon, organic matter, macro and micro nutrients and exchangeable bases were analyzed by standard methods. Addition of different farm and animal wastes helped to degrade the Parthenium and improve the nutrient value. Different treatments have shown improvements in the degraded product in terms of pH, organic carbon, organic matter, macro and micro nutrients and exchangeable bases. The vermicompost was found to have a good quality comparable to any organic manure. The results revealed the economic feasibility of the vermicompost (the organic manure) production as it uses the locally available materials and eco friendly nature of its technology. This methodology can be adopted by farmers to improve the crop productivity and maintain the soil fertility using the locally available organic waste materials.Entities:
Keywords: Eisenia fetida; Field wastes; Nutrient content; Parthenium; Vermicompost; Weeds
Year: 2015 PMID: 25988005 PMCID: PMC4435627 DOI: 10.1186/s40201-015-0203-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Health Sci Eng
Nutrient status of fresh Parthenium
| S No | Nutrient content | Quantity |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Organic carbon (%) | 2.02 |
| 2. | Organic matter (%) | 3.49 |
| 3. | Nitrogen (%) | 0.62 |
| 4. | Phosphorus (%) | 0.10 |
| 5. | Potassium (%) | 0.32 |
| 6. | Zinc (ppm) | 178.00 |
| 7. | Copper (ppm) | 76.00 |
| 8. | Iron (ppm) | 84.00 |
| 9. | Manganese (ppm) | 125.00 |
| 10. | C:N ratio | 3.26 |
| 11. | C: P ratio | 20.20 |
Source: PhD thesis, R. Hiranmai Yadav
Nutrient status of Parthenium vermicomposted with farm and animal wastes
| S No | Parameters | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | pH | 9.08 | 8.72 | 8.63 | 8.52 |
| 2. | OC(%) | 24.56 | 25.90 | 24.48 | 21.83 |
| 3. | OM(%) | 37.61 | 42.96 | 44.73 | 43.12 |
| 4. | N(%) | 1.83 | 2.16 | 2.39 | 2.23 |
| 5. | P(ppm) | 112.83 | 111.94 | 112.27 | 112.87 |
| 6. | K(ppm) | 619.88 | 555.58 | 581.63 | 522.46 |
| 7. | Na(ppm) | 154.58 | 145.40 | 133.92 | 137.25 |
| 8. | Ca(ppm) | 955.94 | 1050.70 | 1204.98 | 1127.52 |
| 9. | Mg(ppm) | 146.25 | 144.23 | 143.40 | 145.30 |
| 10. | Cu(ppm) | 0.70 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.59 |
| 11. | Fe(ppm) | 7.31 | 3.57 | 3.10 | 4.20 |
| 12. | Zn(ppm) | 4.56 | 4.57 | 4.6 | 4.67 |
| 13. | Mn(ppm) | 3.39 | 2.85 | 3.22 | 3.51 |
| 14. | C/N | 13.42 | 11.99 | 10.24 | 9.79 |
| 15. | C/P | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.19 |
Fig. 1pH, Organic carbon (%) and Organic matter content (%) of different vermicomposts
Fig. 2Nitrogen (%) content of different vermicomposts
Fig. 3Phosphorus content of different vermicomposts
Fig. 4Exchangeable bases of different vermicomposts
Fig. 5Micro nutrients contents of different vermicomposts
Fig. 6C/N ratio of different vermicomposts
Fig. 7C/P ratio of different vermicomposts