Literature DB >> 25987628

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis To Estimate Antibacterial Treatment Effect in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection.

Jordan E Cates1, Fanny S Mitrani-Gold2, Gang Li3, Linda M Mundy3.   

Abstract

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted to estimate the antibacterial treatment effect for linezolid and ceftaroline to inform on the design of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) noninferiority trials. The primary endpoints included an early clinical treatment response (ECTR) defined as cessation of lesion spread at 48 to 72 h postrandomization and the test-of-cure (TOC) response defined as total resolution of the infection at 7 to 14 days posttreatment. The systematic review identified no placebo-controlled trials in ABSSSI, 4 placebo-controlled trials in uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infection as a proxy for placebo in ABSSSI, 12 linezolid trials in ABSSSI, 3 ceftaroline trials in ABSSSI, and 2 trials for nonantibacterial treatment. The ECTR rates at 48 to 72 h and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were 78.7% (95% CI, 61.1 to 96.3%) for linezolid, 74.0% (95% CI, 69.7 to 78.3%) for ceftaroline, and 59.0% (95% CI, 52.8 to 65.3%) for nonantibacterial treatment. The early clinical treatment effect could not be estimated, given no available placebo or proxy for placebo data for this endpoint. Clinical, methodological, and statistical heterogeneity influenced the selection of trials for the meta-analysis of the TOC treatment effect estimation. The pooled estimates of the TOC treatment response were 31.0% (95% CI, 6.2 to 55.9%) for the proxy for placebo, 88.1% (95% CI, 81.0 to 95.1%) for linezolid, and 86.1% (95% CI, 83.7 to 88.6%) for ceftaroline. The TOC clinical treatment effect estimation was 25.1% for linezolid and 27.8% for ceftaroline. The antibacterial treatment effect estimation at TOC will inform on the design and analysis of future noninferiority ABSSSI clinical trials.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25987628      PMCID: PMC4505279          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00679-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  52 in total

Review 1.  Approaches to heterogeneity in meta-analysis.

Authors:  D B Petitti
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A collaborative model for endpoint development for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

Authors:  Joseph G Toerner; Laurie Burke; Scott Komo; Elektra Papadopoulos
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Sulphanilamide in the Treatment of Erysipelas.

Authors:  W R Snodgrass; T Anderson
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1937-12-11

4.  Randomized, double-blind, phase II, multicenter study evaluating the safety/tolerability and efficacy of JNJ-Q2, a novel fluoroquinolone, compared with linezolid for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection.

Authors:  Paul Covington; J Michael Davenport; David Andrae; William O'Riordan; Lisa Liverman; Gail McIntyre; June Almenoff
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Clinical and economic outcomes of oral linezolid versus intravenous vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA-complicated, lower-extremity skin and soft-tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J Neal Sharpe; Eugene H Shively; Hiram C Polk
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Linezolid versus vancomycin in treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections.

Authors:  John Weigelt; Kamal Itani; Dennis Stevens; William Lau; Matthew Dryden; Charles Knirsch
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  The safety and efficacy of topical retapamulin ointment versus placebo ointment in the treatment of secondarily infected traumatic lesions: a randomized, double-blind superiority study.

Authors:  John F Tomayko; Gang Li; John J Breton; Nicole Scangarella-Oman; Marybeth Dalessandro; Michael Martin
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.347

Review 8.  Antimicrobial agents for complicated skin and skin-structure infections: justification of noninferiority margins in the absence of placebo-controlled trials.

Authors:  Brad Spellberg; George H Talbot; Helen W Boucher; John S Bradley; David Gilbert; W Michael Scheld; John Edwards; John G Bartlett
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of cephalexin for treatment of uncomplicated skin abscesses in a population at risk for community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Authors:  Priya M Rajendran; David Young; Toby Maurer; Henry Chambers; Francoise Perdreau-Remington; Peter Ro; Hobart Harris
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Skin and soft tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 clone.

Authors:  Jennifer K Johnson; Tina Khoie; Simone Shurland; Kristen Kreisel; O Colin Stine; Mary-Claire Roghmann
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.